Zhylich Dzmitry, Suri Sunjay
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Orthod. 2011 Sep;38(3):185-95; quiz 231. doi: 10.1179/14653121141452.
To review the published literature in order to address clinical questions regarding the indications, effects and outcomes of mandibular incisor extraction in orthodontics.
Three electronic databases were searched: PubMed (1950-January 2011), Ovid Embase+Ovid Embase Classic (1947-January 2011) and Cochrane library (6 Cochrane databases, 1996-January 2011). The following journals were additionally searched: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (1960-January 2011), Angle Orthodontist (1960-January 2011), European Journal of Orthodontics (1970-January 2011) and Journal of Orthodontics (1974-January 2011). Grey literature was searched using Google Scholar and System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe. Secondary search of the references cited in the relevant articles was also conducted.
Articles in vivo, in Humans, in English, concerning treatment of malocclusion with mandibular incisor extractions or missing mandibular incisors. Fifty-four publications met these inclusion criteria and were reviewed.
Data were extracted independently by two reviewers with regard to: (1) indications; (2) contraindications; (3) effects; (4) outcomes; and (5) factors associated with successful outcomes.
Considering the descriptive nature of the studies found, a narrative synthesis was undertaken.
The descriptive nature of published articles precludes making strong evidence-based recommendations regarding this extraction choice, but it is clear that mandibular incisor extraction can be effectively used in the resolution of crowding, as well as intermaxillary malocclusion in carefully selected cases. Several factors that could lead to good outcomes of orthodontic treatment following mandibular incisor extraction were identified. Mild-to-moderate class III malocclusion, an edge-to-edge anterior occlusion or anterior crossbite, with mild anterior mandibular tooth size excess, and minimal open bite tendencies were the clinical situations most frequently treated with this unique extraction choice. On the other hand, clinicians should be careful to avoid poor outcomes such as gingival recession, open interproximal gingival embrasures, increased overjet and overbite.
回顾已发表的文献,以解决有关正畸治疗中下颌切牙拔除的适应证、效果及结果的临床问题。
检索了三个电子数据库:PubMed(1950年 - 2011年1月)、Ovid Embase + Ovid Embase Classic(1947年 - 2011年1月)和Cochrane图书馆(6个Cochrane数据库,1996年 - 2011年1月)。另外还检索了以下期刊:《美国正畸与牙颌面正畸杂志》(1960年 - 2011年1月)、《安氏正畸医师》(1960年 - 2011年1月)、《欧洲正畸杂志》(1970年 - 2011年1月)和《正畸杂志》(1974年 - 2011年1月)。使用谷歌学术和欧洲灰色文献信息系统检索灰色文献。还对相关文章中引用的参考文献进行了二次检索。
纳入人类体内、英文撰写的关于下颌切牙拔除或下颌切牙缺失矫治错牙合畸形的文章。54篇出版物符合这些纳入标准并进行了综述。
由两名审阅者独立提取关于以下方面的数据:(1)适应证;(2)禁忌证;(3)效果;(4)结果;(5)与成功结果相关的因素。
鉴于所发现研究的描述性性质,进行了叙述性综述。
已发表文章的描述性性质使得无法就这种拔牙选择提出强有力的循证推荐,但很明显,下颌切牙拔除可有效地用于解决牙列拥挤以及经过精心挑选病例中的颌间错牙合畸形。确定了几个可能导致下颌切牙拔除后正畸治疗取得良好效果的因素。轻度至中度III类错牙合畸形、前牙对刃咬合或前牙反牙合、伴有轻度下颌前牙牙量过大且开牙合倾向最小,是最常采用这种独特拔牙选择进行治疗的临床情况。另一方面,临床医生应注意避免出现诸如牙龈退缩、邻面牙龈间隙增宽、覆盖和覆牙合增加等不良结果。