Department of Clinical Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;48(1):199-208. doi: 10.3233/CH-2011-1400.
The aim of the study was to evaluate whether contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can improve the visualization of in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in comparison to color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) and power Doppler.
The study included the follow up of thirty patients after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Intrastenotic flow detection and lengths of in-stent restenosis were the main criteria. A high-end ultrasound machine (Siemens, ACUSON, Sequoia or S2000) with a multi-frequency linear 9 MHz or 15 MHz transducer was used to carry out contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue. In cases of treatment of a high degree in-stent stenosis intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used.
All patients were examined using all diagnostic ultrasound tools of the study. In five patients (17%) an in-stent restenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) was found. Two patients need a reintervention. The results show that the contrast enhanced ultrasound could improve the diagnostic assessment capabilities in comparison to CCDS and power Doppler for patients with in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting of the ICA.
Contrast enhanced ultrasound is a reliable method for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting of the ICA. CEUS provides a reduction in intrastenotic flow artefacts, resulting in better visualisation and detection of the complete length of the stenosis in comparison with CCDS and power Doppler. In order to elucidate hemodynamic changes, additional Doppler examinations are still necessary.
本研究旨在评估与彩色编码双功超声(CCDS)和能量多普勒相比,对比增强超声(CEUS)是否能改善颈内动脉(ICA)支架内狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后的可视化效果。
该研究随访了 30 例颈动脉支架置入术后的患者。主要观察指标为支架内血流检测和支架内再狭窄长度。采用西门子 ACUSON、Sequoia 或 S2000 高端超声仪,应用 SonoVue 行对比增强超声,探头为多频线阵 9MHz 或 15MHz。对于高度狭窄的支架内再狭窄患者,采用经动脉数字减影血管造影(DSA)。
所有患者均使用本研究的所有诊断超声工具进行检查。在 5 例患者(17%)中发现了 ICA 支架内再狭窄。2 例患者需要再次介入治疗。结果表明,CEUS 与 CCDS 和能量多普勒相比,可提高支架内再狭窄患者的诊断评估能力。
CEUS 是评估 ICA 支架内再狭窄的一种可靠方法。CEUS 可减少支架内血流伪影,与 CCDS 和能量多普勒相比,可更好地显示和检测狭窄的全长。为了阐明血流动力学变化,仍需要进行附加的多普勒检查。