• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利重症监护病房的终末关怀:我们现在在哪里?

End of life care in Italian intensive care units: where are we now?

机构信息

Trauma Center and Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department, S. Camillo-C. Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Sep;77(9):911-20.

PMID:21878873
Abstract

Most patients in the ICU are unable to make decisions for themselves at the end of life (EOL), and the responsibility for these decisions falls to the medical staff and patients' relatives. Therefore, clinicians must frequently communicate with patients' relatives to understand the patients' values and preferences as they perform medical decision making. The family's role in this process varies: the entire burden of decision making could rest with the family, or family members could be informed of the decisions without admission into the decision-making process. In contrast to these two extremes, clinicians and family members may also enter into shared decision making: an exchange of views and opinions between clinicians and the patient's family to enable the two parties to reach decisions together. In this latter scenario, the effectiveness of the discussions that take place between clinicians and family members becomes a crucial marker of high-quality intensive care. In this review, we provide an overview of the current literature concerning the state of EOL care in European and Italian ICUs and then summarize several European and American recommendations for improving EOL care in the ICU. Finally, we examine the opportunity to use shared decision making to improve EOL care in the ICU through interdisciplinary communication, open and realistic discussion of prognosis with families, and an approach respecting different cultural perspectives.

摘要

大多数 ICU 患者在生命末期(EOL)无法为自己做出决策,这些决策的责任落在医务人员和患者家属身上。因此,临床医生必须经常与患者家属沟通,了解患者的价值观和偏好,以便在进行医疗决策时做出决策。在这个过程中,家庭的角色各不相同:决策的全部负担可能由家庭承担,或者可以在不参与决策过程的情况下向家属告知决策。与这两个极端相反,临床医生和家庭成员也可能参与共同决策:临床医生和患者家属之间交换意见和观点,使双方能够共同做出决策。在后一种情况下,临床医生和家属之间进行的讨论的有效性成为高质量重症监护的关键标志。在这篇综述中,我们概述了欧洲和意大利 ICU 中 EOL 护理的现状,然后总结了一些欧洲和美国改善 ICU 中 EOL 护理的建议。最后,我们探讨了通过跨学科沟通、与家属公开和现实地讨论预后以及尊重不同文化观点的方法,利用共同决策来改善 ICU 中 EOL 护理的机会。

相似文献

1
End of life care in Italian intensive care units: where are we now?意大利重症监护病房的终末关怀:我们现在在哪里?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Sep;77(9):911-20.
2
End-of-life communication in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的临终沟通。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):433-42. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
EfCCNa survey: European intensive care nurses' attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care.欧洲危重症护理协会调查:欧洲重症监护护士对临终关怀的态度和信念。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):110-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2008.00328.x.
4
Preliminary report of the integration of a palliative care team into an intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗团队整合的初步报告。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346540. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
5
Straddling the fence: ICU nurses advocating for hospice care.骑墙观望:倡导临终关怀的重症监护室护士
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;24(1):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2012.01.006.
6
[Limiting life sustaining therapies].[限制维持生命的治疗方法]
Rev Mal Respir. 2006 Sep;23(4 Suppl):13S29-45.
7
A pilot audit of the process of end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房临终决策过程的试点审计。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Jun;9(2):213-8.
8
[Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].[临终关怀/姑息治疗中的关键伦理讨论]
Acta Med Croatica. 2008 Dec;62(5):447-54.
9
End-of-life decision making in the ICU.重症监护病房中的临终决策
Clin Chest Med. 2009 Mar;30(1):181-94, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.11.002.
10
Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement.走向重症监护病房临终时的共同决策:改进的机会。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):461-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.461.

引用本文的文献

1
Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.印度重症医学学会和印度姑息治疗协会关于重症监护病房临终关怀与姑息治疗的专家共识及立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar;28(3):200-250. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24661.
2
The state of knowledge of young Italian medicolegal doctors on the law of provisions for informed consent and advance treatment directives: a multi-centric survey two years after the enactment of Law 219 of 2017.意大利年轻医学法学医生对知情同意法和预先治疗指示法的知识状况:2017 年第 219 号法律颁布两年后的多中心调查。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Aug 10;92(1):e2021005. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.10129.
3
Shared care plan: an extraordinary tool for the personalization of medicine and respect for self-determination.共同照护计划:医学个体化和尊重自主权的非凡工具。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Apr 29;92(1):e2021001. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.9597.
4
Take-Home Messages from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Strengths and Pitfalls of the Italian National Health Service from a Medico-Legal Point of View.新冠疫情的经验教训:从法医学角度看意大利国家医疗服务体系的优势与不足
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;9(1):17. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010017.
5
Stand by me 2.0. Visits by family members at Covid-19 time.《伴我同行2.0》。新冠疫情期间家庭成员的探视情况。
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 11;91(2):71-74. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i2.9569.
6
Validation of END-of-life ScorING-system to identify the dying patient: a prospective analysis.END-of-life 评分系统对识别终末期患者的验证:一项前瞻性分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 9;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00979-y.
7
Acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised adults.免疫功能低下成人的急性呼吸衰竭。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):173-186. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30345-X. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
Futile Treatment-A Review.无效治疗——综述
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Sep;14(3):329-337. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9793-x. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Limitation to Advanced Life Support in patients admitted to intensive care unit with integrated palliative care.入住重症监护病房并接受综合姑息治疗患者的高级生命支持限制
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Sep;28(3):294-300. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160042. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
10
[The palliative patient as an emergency patient: A model for decision making in life-threatening situations using 4 case reports].[姑息治疗患者作为急诊患者:一种基于4例病例报告的危及生命情况下的决策模型]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015 May;110(4):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s00063-014-0405-9. Epub 2014 Sep 18.