Suppr超能文献

比较收缩压、舒张压、脉压和平均动脉压预测 2 型糖尿病:伊斯法罕糖尿病预防研究。

Comparison of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure for prediction of type 2 diabetes: the Isfahan Diabetes Prevention Study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Endokrynol Pol. 2011;62(4):324-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), pulse pressure (PP), fraction PP (PPF) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) to predict progression to diabetes in non-diabetic first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 701 non-diabetic FDRs aged 20-70 in 2003 to 2005 were followed through to 2008 for the occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. At baseline and through follow-ups, participants underwent a standard 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. Prediction of progression to type 2 diabetes was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves based upon measurement of PP, MAP, PPF, systolic and diastolic BP.

RESULTS

Diabetes developed in 72 participants (10.3%) during the follow-up period. The incidence of type 2 diabetes was 3.4 per 100 person years in men and 4.9 in women. Systolic and diastolic BP and MAP were related to diabetes, but PP and PPF were not. Systolic and diastolic BP and MAP have similar associations with incident diabetes. Areas under the ROC curves were 0.582 for systolic, 0.589 for diastolic, 0.589 for MAP, 0.520 for PP, and 0.468 for PPF.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that systolic and diastolic BP are as strong as MAP in predicting progression to diabetes. Increased BP may help identify FDRs of patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for diabetes who are candidates for BP control.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较收缩压和舒张压(BP)、脉压(PP)、脉压分数(PPF)和平均动脉压(MAP)预测 2 型糖尿病患者非糖尿病一级亲属(FDR)进展为糖尿病的能力。

材料与方法

2003 年至 2005 年间,共纳入 701 名年龄在 20-70 岁之间的非糖尿病 FDR,随访至 2008 年以观察 2 型糖尿病的发生。在基线和随访期间,所有参与者均接受标准的 75g 2 小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验。使用基于 PP、MAP、PPF、收缩压和舒张压测量的接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积评估进展为 2 型糖尿病的预测。

结果

在随访期间,72 名参与者(10.3%)发生糖尿病。男性和女性的 2 型糖尿病发病率分别为每 100 人年 3.4 例和 4.9 例。收缩压和舒张压以及 MAP 与糖尿病有关,但 PP 和 PPF 无关。收缩压和舒张压以及 MAP 与新发糖尿病具有相似的相关性。ROC 曲线下面积分别为收缩压 0.582、舒张压 0.589、MAP 0.589、PP 0.520 和 PPF 0.468。

结论

这些结果表明,收缩压和舒张压与 MAP 一样,在预测糖尿病进展方面具有很强的预测能力。BP 升高可能有助于识别 2 型糖尿病患者的 FDR,这些 FDR 发生糖尿病的风险较高,是 BP 控制的候选者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验