Suppr超能文献

中风患者和健康个体接受电刺激前庭时的轻微不良反应。

Minor adverse effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation in persons with stroke and healthy individuals.

作者信息

Utz Kathrin S, Korluss Kathia, Schmidt Lena, Rosenthal Alisha, Oppenländer Karin, Keller Ingo, Kerkhoff Georg

机构信息

Clinical Neuropsychology Unit and University Ambulance, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2011;25(11):1058-69. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.607789. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) induces polarity-specific activations in the vestibular nerves and upstream in the vestibular and parietotemporal cortices as well as sub-cortical regions. This makes it an attractive technique for cognitive neuromodulation. However, systematic studies regarding adverse effects of GVS are unavailable. Thus, this study assessed adverse effects during and after sub-sensory GVS (mean: 0.6 mA) and GVS with 1.5 mA.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-five GVS sessions delivered to 55 persons with stroke and 30 healthy individuals were analysed using a 34-item-questionnaire including potential symptoms and rating scales for adverse effects.

RESULTS

The most frequent symptoms during and after GVS were slight itching (mean: 10.2%) and tingling (mean: 10.7%) underneath the electrodes. Healthy individuals and persons with stroke did not differ in their incidence and rated intensity of adverse effects, nor did persons with or without unilateral spatial neglect. Adverse effects were found more frequently with GVS with 1.5 mA as with sub-sensory GVS. Participants were unable to differentiate real from sham conditions during sub-sensory GVS. Importantly, neither seizures nor vertigo or nausea were observed.

CONCLUSION

Sub-sensory GVS and GVS with 1.5 mA induce very few and mild adverse effects in healthy and persons with stroke and are safe when safety guidelines are followed.

摘要

目的

直流电前庭刺激(GVS)可在前庭神经以及前庭和顶颞叶皮质及皮质下区域的上游诱导极性特异性激活。这使其成为一种有吸引力的认知神经调节技术。然而,关于GVS不良反应的系统性研究尚不可得。因此,本研究评估了亚感觉阈值GVS(平均:0.6 mA)和1.5 mA的GVS期间及之后的不良反应。

方法

使用一份包含潜在症状和不良反应评分量表的34项问卷,对55名中风患者和30名健康个体进行的255次GVS治疗进行了分析。

结果

GVS期间及之后最常见的症状是电极下方轻微瘙痒(平均:10.2%)和刺痛(平均:10.7%)。健康个体和中风患者在不良反应的发生率和严重程度评分上没有差异,有或没有单侧空间忽视的患者之间也没有差异。与亚感觉阈值GVS相比,1.5 mA的GVS不良反应更频繁。在亚感觉阈值GVS期间,参与者无法区分真实刺激和假刺激条件。重要的是,未观察到癫痫发作、眩晕或恶心。

结论

亚感觉阈值GVS和1.5 mA的GVS在健康人和中风患者中引起的不良反应极少且轻微,遵循安全指南时是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验