University of Washington-Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Resuscitation. 2010 Feb;81(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
Immediate defibrillation is the traditional approach to resuscitation of cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (VF/VT). Delaying defibrillation to provide chest compressions may improve survival. We examined the effect of the duration of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to first defibrillation on survival in patients with out-of-hospital VF/VT.
From a prospective multi-center observational registry of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we identified 1638 EMS-treated cardiac arrests with first recorded rhythm VF/VT or "shockable" and complete data for analysis. Survival to hospital discharge was determined as a function of EMS CPR duration prior to first shock.
Compared to the reference group of first EMS CPR duration < or =45 s, the odds of survival was greater among patients who received between 46 and 195 s of EMS CPR before first shock (46-75 s odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.87; 76-105 s, OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.80-2.35; 106-135 s, OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.96-2.45; 136-165 s, OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.71-2.15; 166-195 s, OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.85-2.52). The benefit of EMS CPR before defibrillation was reduced when the duration of CPR exceeded 195 s (196-225 s, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47-1.81; 226-255 s, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.46-1.79; 256-285 s, OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.17-1.29; 286-315 s, OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.59-2.85). An optimal EMS CPR duration was not identified and no duration achieved statistical significance.
In this observational analysis of VF/VT arrest, between 46 and 195 s of EMS CPR prior to defibrillation was weakly associated with improved survival compared to < or =45 s. Randomized trials are needed to confirm the optimal duration of EMS CPR prior to defibrillation and to assess the impact of first CPR duration on all initial rhythms.
由于心室颤动或心动过速(VF/VT)导致的心脏骤停,传统的复苏方法是立即除颤。延迟除颤以提供胸外按压可能会提高存活率。我们研究了在首次除颤前急救医疗服务(EMS)心肺复苏(CPR)的持续时间对院外 VF/VT 患者存活的影响。
从一项前瞻性的多中心 EMS 治疗院外心脏骤停观察性登记研究中,我们确定了 1638 例接受 EMS 治疗的院外心脏骤停患者,这些患者的首次记录节律为 VF/VT 或“可除颤”,并且有完整的数据进行分析。以出院时的存活率作为首次电击前 EMS-CPR 持续时间的函数。
与首次 EMS-CPR 持续时间<或=45 s 的参考组相比,在首次电击前接受 46-195 s EMS-CPR 的患者存活的可能性更大(46-75 s 的比值比[OR]为 1.15,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.71-1.87;76-105 s,OR 1.37,95%CI 0.80-2.35;106-135 s,OR 1.53,95%CI 0.96-2.45;136-165 s,OR 1.24,95%CI 0.71-2.15;166-195 s,OR 1.47,95%CI 0.85-2.52)。当 CPR 持续时间超过 195 s 时,除颤前 EMS-CPR 的益处降低(196-225 s,OR 0.95,95%CI 0.47-1.81;226-255 s,OR 0.91,95%CI 0.46-1.79;256-285 s,OR 0.46,95%CI 0.17-1.29;286-315 s,OR 1.29,95%CI 0.59-2.85)。没有确定最佳的 EMS-CPR 持续时间,也没有达到统计学意义。
在这项对 VF/VT 骤停的观察性分析中,与<或=45 s 相比,在首次除颤前进行 46-195 s 的 EMS-CPR 与存活率的提高呈弱相关。需要进行随机试验来证实除颤前 EMS-CPR 的最佳持续时间,并评估首次 CPR 持续时间对所有初始节律的影响。