Suppr超能文献

院外室颤或室速除颤前,由急救医疗服务行心肺复苏可提高存活率:复苏结果联盟的观察结果。

Survival increases with CPR by Emergency Medical Services before defibrillation of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia: observations from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.

机构信息

University of Washington-Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2010 Feb;81(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immediate defibrillation is the traditional approach to resuscitation of cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (VF/VT). Delaying defibrillation to provide chest compressions may improve survival. We examined the effect of the duration of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to first defibrillation on survival in patients with out-of-hospital VF/VT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a prospective multi-center observational registry of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we identified 1638 EMS-treated cardiac arrests with first recorded rhythm VF/VT or "shockable" and complete data for analysis. Survival to hospital discharge was determined as a function of EMS CPR duration prior to first shock.

RESULTS

Compared to the reference group of first EMS CPR duration < or =45 s, the odds of survival was greater among patients who received between 46 and 195 s of EMS CPR before first shock (46-75 s odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.87; 76-105 s, OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.80-2.35; 106-135 s, OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.96-2.45; 136-165 s, OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.71-2.15; 166-195 s, OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.85-2.52). The benefit of EMS CPR before defibrillation was reduced when the duration of CPR exceeded 195 s (196-225 s, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47-1.81; 226-255 s, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.46-1.79; 256-285 s, OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.17-1.29; 286-315 s, OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.59-2.85). An optimal EMS CPR duration was not identified and no duration achieved statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In this observational analysis of VF/VT arrest, between 46 and 195 s of EMS CPR prior to defibrillation was weakly associated with improved survival compared to < or =45 s. Randomized trials are needed to confirm the optimal duration of EMS CPR prior to defibrillation and to assess the impact of first CPR duration on all initial rhythms.

摘要

背景

由于心室颤动或心动过速(VF/VT)导致的心脏骤停,传统的复苏方法是立即除颤。延迟除颤以提供胸外按压可能会提高存活率。我们研究了在首次除颤前急救医疗服务(EMS)心肺复苏(CPR)的持续时间对院外 VF/VT 患者存活的影响。

材料和方法

从一项前瞻性的多中心 EMS 治疗院外心脏骤停观察性登记研究中,我们确定了 1638 例接受 EMS 治疗的院外心脏骤停患者,这些患者的首次记录节律为 VF/VT 或“可除颤”,并且有完整的数据进行分析。以出院时的存活率作为首次电击前 EMS-CPR 持续时间的函数。

结果

与首次 EMS-CPR 持续时间<或=45 s 的参考组相比,在首次电击前接受 46-195 s EMS-CPR 的患者存活的可能性更大(46-75 s 的比值比[OR]为 1.15,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.71-1.87;76-105 s,OR 1.37,95%CI 0.80-2.35;106-135 s,OR 1.53,95%CI 0.96-2.45;136-165 s,OR 1.24,95%CI 0.71-2.15;166-195 s,OR 1.47,95%CI 0.85-2.52)。当 CPR 持续时间超过 195 s 时,除颤前 EMS-CPR 的益处降低(196-225 s,OR 0.95,95%CI 0.47-1.81;226-255 s,OR 0.91,95%CI 0.46-1.79;256-285 s,OR 0.46,95%CI 0.17-1.29;286-315 s,OR 1.29,95%CI 0.59-2.85)。没有确定最佳的 EMS-CPR 持续时间,也没有达到统计学意义。

结论

在这项对 VF/VT 骤停的观察性分析中,与<或=45 s 相比,在首次除颤前进行 46-195 s 的 EMS-CPR 与存活率的提高呈弱相关。需要进行随机试验来证实除颤前 EMS-CPR 的最佳持续时间,并评估首次 CPR 持续时间对所有初始节律的影响。

相似文献

9
Immediate defibrillation or defibrillation after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.即刻除颤或心肺复苏后除颤。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):393-400. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.569848. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The primacy of basics in advanced life support.高级生命支持中基础操作的首要地位。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Jun;15(3):198-202. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283293138.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验