Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Dec;17(12):1845-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03519.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the need for active surveillance of antibiotic resistance in ambulatory infections. We measured the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infections (UTIs) (n = 1018) and skin infections (n = 213) diagnosed in outpatients between September 2008 and February 2009 in the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. Samples were stratified into 'solicited' (diagnostic work-up for study purpose only) and 'routine' (diagnostic work-up as part of standard care). Susceptibility patterns were compared for 463 Escherichia coli isolates from UTIs (231 solicited; 232 routine) and 87 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin infections (35 solicited; 52 routine). Overall, E. coli showed higher susceptibility to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and norfloxacin in solicited than in routine samples. Among 15-45-year-old patients, susceptibility rates were comparable between solicited and routine samples for all antibiotics except for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. However, among patients >45 years old, isolates from routine samples showed lower susceptibility to all β-lactams tested and quinolones than those from solicited samples. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli isolates were rare (solicited, 0.4%; routine, 1.7%; p 0.4). Susceptibility patterns of S. aureus were comparable between solicited and routine samples. Therefore, in the outpatient setting, susceptibility rates for E. coli isolates differ by indication for urinary culture and age. Surveillance based on samples taken during standard care may underestimate susceptibility rates for uncomplicated infections, especially among the elderly. Reports of resistance data should include age stratification.
本研究旨在评估在门诊感染中对抗生素耐药性进行主动监测的必要性。我们测量了 2008 年 9 月至 2009 年 2 月间瑞士伯尔尼州门诊患者中诊断为尿路感染(UTIs)(n = 1018)和皮肤感染(n = 213)的抗生素耐药率。样本分为“送检”(仅为研究目的进行诊断性检查)和“常规”(作为标准护理一部分的诊断性检查)。我们比较了 463 株来自 UTI 的大肠杆菌(231 株送检;232 株常规)和 87 株来自皮肤感染的金黄色葡萄球菌(35 株送检;52 株常规)的药敏模式。总体而言,送检样本中的大肠杆菌对氨苄西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和诺氟沙星的敏感性高于常规样本。在 15-45 岁的患者中,除阿莫西林-克拉维酸外,所有抗生素的送检和常规样本的敏感性率相当。然而,在>45 岁的患者中,常规样本中的分离株对所有β-内酰胺类和喹诺酮类药物的敏感性均低于送检样本。产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠杆菌分离株罕见(送检,0.4%;常规,1.7%;p > 0.05)。金黄色葡萄球菌的药敏模式在送检和常规样本之间相似。因此,在门诊环境中,尿培养的适应证和年龄会影响大肠杆菌分离株的敏感性率。基于标准护理中采集的样本进行监测可能会低估简单感染的敏感性率,尤其是在老年人中。耐药数据报告应包括年龄分层。