Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 May;133(1):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1746-1. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Investigations of breast carcinogenesis often rely upon comparisons between cancer tissue and nonmalignant breast tissue. It is unclear how well common reference sources of nonmalignant breast tissues reflect normal breast tissue. Breast tissue samples were evaluated from three sources: (1) normal donor tissues in the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank at Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (KTB), (2) women who underwent reduction mammaplasty (RM) at Mayo Clinic Rochester, and (3) the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort Study (BBD). Samples were examined histologically and assessed for proliferative disease and degree of lobular involution. Univariate comparisons were performed among the study groups, and multivariate analyses were performed with logistic regression to assess the association between study group and the presence of epithelial proliferative disease and complete lobular involution. Histologic data were collected for 455 KTB samples, 259 RM samples, and 319 BBD samples. Histologic findings and the frequency of epithelial proliferation were significantly different among the groups. Histologic abnormalities were seen in a minority of the KTB samples (35%), whereas an abnormality was present in 88% of RM tissues and 97.5% of BBD samples. The presence of proliferative disease (with or without atypical hyperplasia) was present in 3.3% of normal donors (3.3%), 17% of RM samples, and 34.9% of BBD samples (P < 0.0001 for each comparison). Multivariate analyses confirmed that these differences remained significant and also showed higher likelihood of complete lobular involution in the normal donor samples compared to RM and BBD tissues. Compared to benign breast disease tissues and reduction mammaplasty tissues, breast tissue samples from normal donors have significantly fewer histologic abnormalities and a higher frequency of more complete lobular involution. Breast tissue samples from normal donors represent a unique tissue resource with histologic features consistent with lower breast cancer risk.
对乳腺癌发生的研究通常依赖于癌组织和非恶性乳腺组织之间的比较。目前尚不清楚常见的非恶性乳腺组织的参考来源在多大程度上反映了正常乳腺组织。乳腺组织样本来自三个来源:(1)印第安纳大学西蒙癌症中心苏珊·科曼库(Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank)的正常供体组织(KTB),(2)罗切斯特梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic Rochester)接受乳房缩小成形术(reduction mammaplasty,RM)的女性,(3)梅奥诊所良性乳腺疾病队列研究(Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort Study,BBD)。对样本进行组织学检查,并评估增生性疾病和小叶退化程度。对研究组进行了单变量比较,并通过逻辑回归进行了多变量分析,以评估研究组与上皮增生性疾病和完全小叶退化的存在之间的关系。为 455 个 KTB 样本、259 个 RM 样本和 319 个 BBD 样本收集了组织学数据。各组间的组织学发现和上皮增殖的频率有显著差异。KTB 样本中少数(35%)存在组织学异常,而 RM 组织中存在异常(88%),BBD 样本中存在异常(97.5%)。增殖性疾病(伴或不伴非典型增生)在正常供体中存在(3.3%),在 RM 样本中存在(17%),在 BBD 样本中存在(34.9%)(每种比较的 P < 0.0001)。多变量分析证实这些差异仍然显著,并且与 RM 和 BBD 组织相比,正常供体样本完全小叶退化的可能性更高。与良性乳腺疾病组织和乳房缩小成形术组织相比,正常供体的乳腺组织样本具有明显较少的组织学异常和更高频率的更完全小叶退化。正常供体的乳腺组织样本代表了一种独特的组织资源,其组织学特征与较低的乳腺癌风险一致。