Allergy/Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento, Via Bignami 1, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Nov;12(16):2527-32. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.616494. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
The efficacy of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in patients with insect sting allergy is not questioned. However, its safety, especially when honeybee is used, is a matter of concern.
A systematic review of the literature on VIT was done, with both aqueous and depot extracts, to compare the frequency of systemic reactions to honeybee and vespid venoms. A Medline search was performed using the keywords 'venom immunotherapy', 'safety' and 'tolerability'. The articles obtained were analyzed regarding the total number of patients treated with either honeybee or vespid VIT, the number and severity of systemic reactions during therapy, the type of extract used (aqueous or depot) and the administration regimen.
The incidence of systemic reactions to VIT was 25.1% for honeybee venom and 5.8% for vespid venom (p < 0.0001), while it was similar with aqueous and depot extracts in the whole population of patients. This confirms that during VIT systemic reactions are significantly more frequent with honeybee venom compared with vespid venom, while there are no significant overall differences in systemic reactions between aqueous and depot extracts.
毒液免疫疗法(VIT)在昆虫叮咬过敏患者中的疗效是毋庸置疑的。然而,其安全性,特别是在使用蜜蜂时,令人担忧。
对水提物和储库提取物的 VIT 文献进行了系统评价,以比较蜜蜂和胡蜂毒液引起全身性反应的频率。使用关键词“毒液免疫疗法”、“安全性”和“耐受性”在 Medline 上进行了搜索。分析了获得的文章中接受蜜蜂或胡蜂 VIT 治疗的患者总数、治疗期间全身性反应的数量和严重程度、使用的提取物类型(水提物或储库)和给药方案。
VIT 引起的全身性反应发生率,蜜蜂毒液为 25.1%,胡蜂毒液为 5.8%(p < 0.0001),而在所有患者中,水提物和储库提取物的发生率相似。这证实了 VIT 期间,与胡蜂毒液相比,蜜蜂毒液引起全身性反应的频率明显更高,而水提物和储库提取物之间的全身性反应总体差异无统计学意义。