Glaeser Antonia, Müller Christoph, Bode Sebastian
Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Centre and Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Clin Mol Allergy. 2022 Apr 29;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12948-022-00170-3.
Anaphylaxis occurs in up to 3.5% of hymenoptera stings and can be a life-threatening emergency. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) provides excellent protection from further episodes of anaphylaxis and is well tolerated. In this study the frequency of anaphylactic reactions in pediatric patients undergoing rush bee venom immunotherapy was assessed as well as possible risk factors and modified up-dosing schemes are reported.
19 consecutive pediatric patients, who had previously experienced an anaphylactic reaction following a bee sting and showed IgE-mediated sensitization to bee venom, underwent inpatient rush immunotherapy with bee venom extract. We retrospectively compared serological findings (total IgE, serum tryptase level, sensitization to Api m1, Api m3 and Api m10 bee venom allergens) and possible risk factors between patients who experienced an anaphylactic reaction during immunotherapy and patients who did not.
Three of the included 19 patients (15.8%) developed anaphylactic reactions to rush bee venom immunotherapy, all of them between administration of 40 and 80 µg of bee venom extract. However, all three patients reached the standard maintenance dose of 100 µg of bee venom following a modified VIT schedule without any further complications. Total serum IgE levels as well as Api m3 sensitization levels were significantly higher in patients showing an adverse reaction to bee VIT compared to those who did not experience any complications. There were no statistically significant differences concerning age, pre-existing conditions, type and severity of the initial reaction and Api m1, Api m10 and serum tryptase levels between the two subgroups.
Even if anaphylactic reactions occur during the build-up phase of VIT for bee venom in children and adolescents, venom immunotherapy can and should be continued in most cases.
高达3.5%的膜翅目昆虫叮咬会引发过敏反应,这可能是危及生命的紧急情况。毒液免疫疗法(VIT)能有效预防过敏反应再次发作,且耐受性良好。本研究评估了接受快速蜂毒免疫疗法的儿科患者过敏反应的发生率,并报告了可能的危险因素及调整后的递增剂量方案。
19例先前蜂蜇后发生过敏反应且显示对蜂毒IgE介导致敏的连续儿科患者,接受了蜂毒提取物住院快速免疫疗法。我们回顾性比较了免疫疗法期间发生过敏反应的患者与未发生过敏反应的患者之间的血清学检查结果(总IgE、血清类胰蛋白酶水平、对Api m1、Api m3和Api m10蜂毒过敏原的致敏情况)及可能的危险因素。
纳入的19例患者中有3例(15.8%)在快速蜂毒免疫疗法中发生过敏反应,均在注射40至80微克蜂毒提取物期间。然而,所有3例患者按照调整后的VIT方案达到了100微克蜂毒的标准维持剂量,且无任何进一步并发症。与未出现任何并发症的患者相比,对蜂毒VIT有不良反应的患者血清总IgE水平以及Api m3致敏水平显著更高。两个亚组在年龄、既往疾病、初始反应的类型和严重程度以及Api m1、Api m10和血清类胰蛋白酶水平方面无统计学显著差异。
即使在儿童和青少年蜂毒VIT的起始阶段发生过敏反应,在大多数情况下毒液免疫疗法仍可以且应该继续进行。