University of Michigan Autism and Communication Disorders Center (UMACC), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;53(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02458.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Purpose of this study was to systematically examine combined use of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) for children under age 4 using newly developed and revised diagnostic algorithms.
Single and combined use of the ADI-R and ADOS algorithms were compared to clinical best estimate diagnoses for 435 children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), 113 children with nonspectrum disorders, and 47 children with typical development from 12 to 47 months of age. Sequential strategies to reach a diagnostic decision by prioritizing administrations of instruments were also evaluated.
Well-balanced sensitivities and specificities above 80% were obtained for ASD diagnoses using both instruments. Specificities significantly improved when both instruments were used compared to one. Scores that can be used to systematically prioritize administrations of instruments were identified.
The ADI-R and ADOS make independent, additive contributions to more accurate diagnostic decisions for clinicians evaluating toddlers and young preschoolers with ASD. Sequential assessment strategies using the scores identified may be appropriate for some children.
本研究的目的是系统地检查使用新开发和修订的诊断算法,对 4 岁以下儿童同时使用自闭症诊断访谈修订版(ADI-R)和自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)。
将 ADI-R 和 ADOS 算法的单独和联合使用与临床最佳估计诊断进行比较,纳入了 435 名自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童、113 名非谱系障碍儿童和 47 名 12 至 47 个月的典型发育儿童。还评估了通过优先进行仪器管理来达到诊断决策的顺序策略。
使用两种仪器均获得了 80%以上的平衡敏感度和特异性,用于 ASD 诊断。与使用一种仪器相比,同时使用两种仪器时特异性显著提高。确定了可用于系统地优先管理仪器的分数。
ADI-R 和 ADOS 为评估有 ASD 的幼儿和学龄前儿童的临床医生做出更准确的诊断决策提供了独立的、附加的贡献。使用所确定的分数的顺序评估策略可能适用于某些儿童。