• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利拉鲁肽与磺脲类或西他列汀对比,作为 2 型糖尿病二甲双胍单药治疗的附加疗法的成本效用分析。

Cost-utility analysis of liraglutide compared with sulphonylurea or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin monotherapy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2012 Mar;29(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03429.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03429.x
PMID:21883438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3378710/
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide as add-on to metformin vs. glimepiride or sitagliptin in patients with Type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with first-line metformin.

METHODS

Data were sourced from a clinical trial comparing liraglutide vs. glimepiride, both in combination with metformin, and a clinical trial comparing liraglutide vs. sitagliptin, both as add-on to metformin. Only the subgroup of patients in whom liraglutide was added to metformin monotherapy was included in the cost-utility analysis. The CORE Diabetes Model was used to simulate outcomes and costs with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg vs. glimepiride and vs. sitagliptin over patients' lifetimes. Treatment effects were taken directly from the trials. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum and costs were accounted from a third-party payer (UK National Health System) perspective.

RESULTS

Treatment with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg resulted, respectively, in mean increases in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.32 ± 0.15 and 0.28 ± 0.14 quality-adjusted life years vs. glimepiride, and 0.19 ± 0.15 and 0.31 ± 0.15 quality-adjusted life years vs. sitagliptin, and was associated with higher costs of £ 3003 ± £ 678 and £ 4688 ± £ 639 vs. glimepiride, and £ 1842 ± £ 751 and £ 3224 ± £ 683 vs. sitagliptin, over a patient's lifetime. Both liraglutide doses were cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £ 9449 and £ 16,501 per quality-adjusted life year gained vs. glimepiride, and £ 9851 and £ 10,465 per quality-adjusted life year gained vs. sitagliptin, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide, added to metformin monotherapy, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes in a UK setting.

摘要

目的

研究利拉鲁肽联合二甲双胍对比格列美脲或西格列汀添加治疗二甲双胍单药控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果。

方法

数据来源于比较利拉鲁肽联合二甲双胍与格列美脲,以及比较利拉鲁肽联合二甲双胍与西格列汀的临床试验。仅将利拉鲁肽添加到二甲双胍单药治疗的患者亚组纳入成本效用分析。采用 CORE 糖尿病模型模拟利拉鲁肽 1.2mg 和 1.8mg 对比格列美脲和西格列汀在患者一生中的疗效和成本。治疗效果直接取自试验。成本和结果以每年 3.5%贴现,从第三方付款人(英国国家医疗服务体系)的角度考虑成本。

结果

利拉鲁肽 1.2mg 和 1.8mg 治疗组与格列美脲相比,分别使质量调整预期寿命平均增加 0.32 ± 0.15 和 0.28 ± 0.14 个质量调整生命年,与西格列汀相比,分别使质量调整预期寿命平均增加 0.19 ± 0.15 和 0.31 ± 0.15 个质量调整生命年,而成本分别增加 3003 ± 678 英镑和 4688 ± 639 英镑,以及 1842 ± 751 英镑和 3224 ± 683 英镑。在患者一生中,两种利拉鲁肽剂量均具有成本效果,增量成本效果比分别为每获得 1 个质量调整生命年的 9449 英镑和 16501 英镑对比格列美脲,以及每获得 1 个质量调整生命年的 9851 英镑和 10465 英镑对比西格列汀。

结论

在英国,利拉鲁肽添加到二甲双胍单药治疗中是治疗 2 型糖尿病的一种具有成本效果的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/3378710/41730ebbaa6d/dme0029-0313-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/3378710/30e731ca6361/dme0029-0313-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/3378710/41730ebbaa6d/dme0029-0313-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/3378710/30e731ca6361/dme0029-0313-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f666/3378710/41730ebbaa6d/dme0029-0313-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of liraglutide compared with sulphonylurea or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin monotherapy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.利拉鲁肽与磺脲类或西他列汀对比,作为 2 型糖尿病二甲双胍单药治疗的附加疗法的成本效用分析。
Diabet Med. 2012 Mar;29(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03429.x.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece.利拉鲁肽与西他列汀或艾塞那肽治疗希腊口服降糖药治疗效果不佳的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 22;14:419. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-419.
3
Cost-effectiveness of add-on treatments to metformin in a Swedish setting: liraglutide vs sulphonylurea or sitagplitin.在瑞典背景下,二甲双胍附加治疗的成本效益:利拉鲁肽与磺脲类药物或西他列汀的比较。
J Med Econ. 2014 Sep;17(9):658-69. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.933110. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
4
Results of a model analysis of the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus exenatide added to metformin, glimepiride, or both for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the United States.在美国,用利拉鲁肽与艾塞那肽对比二甲双胍、格列美脲或两者联合治疗 2 型糖尿病的成本效果模型分析结果。
Clin Ther. 2010 Sep;32(10):1756-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.08.010.
5
Long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with liraglutide versus sitagliptin therapy when added to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a CORE Diabetes Model analysis.利拉鲁肽对比西格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的长期临床和经济结局:CORE Diabetes Model 分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15 Suppl 2:28-37. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.716111. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
6
Cost-effectiveness of sitagliptin-based treatment regimens in European patients with type 2 diabetes and haemoglobin A1c above target on metformin monotherapy.基于西他列汀的治疗方案对欧洲2型糖尿病患者且二甲双胍单药治疗时糖化血红蛋白高于目标值的成本效益分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:43-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00886.x.
7
Cost-utility analysis of liraglutide versus glimepiride as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes patients in China.利拉鲁肽对比格列美脲作为中国 2 型糖尿病患者二甲双胍添加治疗的成本效用分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):436-44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000608. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
8
Evaluating the short-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes failing metformin monotherapy in the United States.评估在美国二甲双胍单药治疗失败的2型糖尿病患者中,利拉鲁肽与西他列汀的短期成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Apr;19(3):237-46. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.3.237.
9
Efficacy and safety over 26 weeks of an oral treatment strategy including sitagliptin compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised clinical trial.在二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,26 周的口服治疗策略(包括西格列汀)与利拉鲁肽注射治疗策略相比的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
Diabetologia. 2013 Jul;56(7):1503-11. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2905-1. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
10
Liraglutide improves treatment satisfaction in people with Type 2 diabetes compared with sitagliptin, each as an add on to metformin.利拉鲁肽相较于西格列汀,可改善与二甲双胍联用的 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗满意度。
Diabet Med. 2011 Mar;28(3):333-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03074.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
2
Pharmacoeconomic Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus: Outcomes and Analysis of Health Benefits Approach.糖尿病的药物经济学方面:健康效益方法的结果与分析
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20(8):12-22. doi: 10.2174/0115733998246567230924134603.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of Type II diabetes.评估并发症对 II 型糖尿病治疗费用的影响。
Diabetologia. 2002 Jul;45(Suppl 1):S13-S17. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0859-9.
2
Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis.为新诊断为 2 型糖尿病的患者提供糖尿病教育和自我管理(DESMOND)计划:成本效益分析。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 20;341:c4093. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4093.
3
Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial.
新型抗糖尿病药物作为 2 型糖尿病二线治疗的成本效益:系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4216-4235. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02612-z. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
4
Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues.系统评价经济学研究的荟萃分析:数据协调与方法学问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1.
5
Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who fail metformin monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies.用于治疗二甲双胍单药治疗失败的2型糖尿病患者的胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂:经济评估研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001020.
6
Real-world Effectiveness of Liraglutide vs. Sitagliptin Among Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan: A Retrospective Observational Study.利拉鲁肽与西他列汀在参加医疗保险优势处方药计划的老年2型糖尿病患者中的真实世界有效性:一项回顾性观察研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):213-228. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00739-3. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Metformin and second- or third-generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.二甲双胍与第二代或第三代磺脲类药物联合治疗成人2型糖尿病
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 18;4(4):CD012368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012368.pub2.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists, and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jun;37(6):777-818. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00774-9.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Liraglutide Versus Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the UK.在英国,利拉鲁肽与达格列净治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Jun;8(3):513-530. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0250-y. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
10
Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain.利拉鲁肽与利司那肽对比:西班牙2型糖尿病治疗中GLP-1受体激动剂疗法的长期成本效益
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):401-415. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0239-6. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
利拉鲁肽对比西格列汀用于二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者:一项 26 周、随机、平行分组、开放性试验。
Lancet. 2010 Apr 24;375(9724):1447-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60307-8.
4
Efficacy and safety of incretin based therapies: clinical trial data.基于肠促胰岛素疗法的疗效与安全性:临床试验数据
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49 Suppl 1:S30-40. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.09079.
5
Cost-effectiveness of lifestyle modification in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者生活方式改变的成本效益
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1453-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0363. Epub 2009 May 12.
6
Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的医学管理:起始和调整治疗的共识算法:美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会的共识声明。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):193-203. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9025. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
7
Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study.利拉鲁肽、格列美脲与安慰剂联合二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:LEAD(利拉鲁肽在糖尿病中的作用和疗效)-2 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):84-90. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1355. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
8
Cost-effectiveness of sitagliptin-based treatment regimens in European patients with type 2 diabetes and haemoglobin A1c above target on metformin monotherapy.基于西他列汀的治疗方案对欧洲2型糖尿病患者且二甲双胍单药治疗时糖化血红蛋白高于目标值的成本效益分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:43-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00886.x.
9
PROactive 06: cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone in Type 2 diabetes in the UK.PROactive 06:吡格列酮在英国2型糖尿病治疗中的成本效益
Diabet Med. 2007 Sep;24(9):982-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02188.x. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
10
Examining correlates of treatment satisfaction for injectable insulin in type 2 diabetes: lessons learned from a clinical trial comparing biphasic and basal analogues.2型糖尿病患者使用注射胰岛素治疗满意度的相关因素研究:一项比较双相胰岛素和基础胰岛素类似物的临床试验经验教训
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Feb 7;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-8.