• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶神经刺激治疗特发性粪便失禁的功能结果和患者满意度。

Functional results and patient satisfaction with sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic faecal incontinence.

机构信息

Surgical Research Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):753-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02800.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02800.x
PMID:21883814
Abstract

AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence (FI) when conservative modalities have failed to restore continence. This two-centre study aimed to document functional outcome and its relationship to patient satisfaction.

METHOD

Patients treated with SNS for idiopathic FI in Aarhus (Denmark) and Maastricht (The Netherlands) were included. At the most recent follow-up appointment, 127 patients (80%) were identified as receiving active SNS therapy. A questionnaire considering bowel habits, quality of life, and self-reported satisfaction and a 3-week bowel-habit diary were mailed to these patients, and 85% responded.

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction was clearly related to the number of FI episodes. Patients experiencing full continence were all satisfied, and although the satisfaction rate decreased as the number of FI episodes increased, 46% of the patients with more FI episodes at follow-up than at baseline were still satisfied. Per-protocol analysis resulted in a satisfaction rate of 57.3%. In total, 74.7% of the patients receiving active SNS therapy reported a reduction of ≥ 50% in FI episodes, 10.3% of whom were dissatisfied after a median of 46 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There is a clear relationship between patient satisfaction and improved continence. A total of 57.3% of the patients offered SNS therapy were satisfied at follow-up. However, 46% of the patients with more FI episodes at follow-up than at baseline were also satisfied. Therefore, functional outcome of SNS therapy cannot be based only on bowel-habit diaries and bowel scores.

摘要

目的

骶神经刺激(SNS)是一种治疗粪便失禁(FI)的成熟方法,适用于保守治疗无法恢复控便能力的情况。本项双中心研究旨在记录功能结果及其与患者满意度的关系。

方法

纳入在丹麦奥胡斯和荷兰马斯特里赫特接受 SNS 治疗特发性 FI 的患者。在最近的随访预约中,有 127 名(80%)患者被确定正在接受 SNS 治疗。我们向这些患者邮寄了一份包含排便习惯、生活质量和自我报告满意度的问卷,以及为期 3 周的排便习惯日记,85%的患者做出了回应。

结果

患者满意度与 FI 发作次数明显相关。完全控便的患者均满意,尽管满意度随着 FI 发作次数的增加而降低,但与基线相比,随访时 FI 发作次数增加的患者中仍有 46%满意。根据方案分析,满意度为 57.3%。在接受 SNS 治疗的患者中,有 74.7%报告 FI 发作次数减少≥50%,其中 10.3%在中位随访 46 个月后不满意。

结论

患者满意度与改善的控便能力之间存在明显关系。在接受 SNS 治疗的患者中,有 57.3%的患者在随访时感到满意。然而,与基线相比,随访时 FI 发作次数增加的患者中仍有 46%满意。因此,SNS 治疗的功能结果不能仅基于排便习惯日记和排便评分。

相似文献

1
Functional results and patient satisfaction with sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic faecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗特发性粪便失禁的功能结果和患者满意度。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):753-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02800.x.
2
Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation.骶神经刺激后,大便失禁患者的生活质量有显著改善。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):103-12. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182486e60.
3
[Indications and results of sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence].[骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的适应证及结果]
Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Apr;133(2):135-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1004737.
4
Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients.预测骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁成功的因素:200 例试验性刺激的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):689-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02260.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
5
Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.经直肠刺激治疗大便失禁的长期疗效和安全性。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1065-75. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822155e9.
6
Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study.骶神经刺激治疗重度大便失禁比最佳药物治疗更有效:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):494-502. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9103-5. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
7
Value of sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: a comparison to the artificial bowel sphincter.
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;11(6):631-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01633.x. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
8
Sacral nerve stimulation in the elderly.老年患者的骶神经刺激治疗。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):200-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02568.x.
9
Bilateral compared with unilateral sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results of a randomized, single-blinded crossover study.双侧与单侧骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的比较:一项随机、单盲交叉研究的结果
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Dec;17(12):1085-93. doi: 10.1111/codi.13111.
10
A pilot study of transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.经皮骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁的初步研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;15(11):1406-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12371.

引用本文的文献

1
Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 3 -Surgical Treatment for Fecal Incontinence, Fecal Incontinence in a Special Conditions- English Version.日本大便失禁诊疗指南 第3部分——大便失禁的外科治疗、特殊情况下的大便失禁 英文版
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021 Jan 28;5(1):84-99. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2020-075. eCollection 2021.
2
Current Position of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.骶神经调节在大便失禁治疗中的现状
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):22-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714247. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Success and Complication Rates After Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Single-center Follow-up Study.
骶神经调节治疗大便失禁和便秘后的成功率及并发症发生率:一项单中心随访研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):159-170. doi: 10.5056/jnm17106.
4
[Sacral nerve modulation in coloproctology].[结直肠肛门外科学中的骶神经调节]
Chirurg. 2018 Jun;89(6):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0643-0.
5
Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration.向美国食品药品监督管理局报告的骶神经调节治疗大便失禁的不良事件。
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May 6;7(2):294-305. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.294.
6
Faecal incontinence: Current knowledges and perspectives.大便失禁:当前的认识与观点
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016 Feb 15;7(1):59-71. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.59.
7
Management of patients with faecal incontinence.大便失禁患者的管理
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;9(1):86-97. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15614516.
8
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence - efficacy confirmed from a two-centre prospectively maintained database.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁——来自两个中心前瞻性维护数据库的疗效证实
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2411-7. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence.预测特发性大便失禁患者对骶神经调节治疗满意度的基线因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;29(7):793-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1870-6. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
10
Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.当前粪便失禁的治疗管理:选择治疗方案以优化治疗结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 28;19(48):9216-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216.