• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
To join or not to join: an investigation of individual facilitators and inhibitors of medical faculty participation in interdisciplinary research teams.加入还是不加入:一项关于医学教师参与跨学科研究团队的个人促进因素和阻碍因素的调查。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Aug;4(4):274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00321.x.
2
To Give and To Get: How Nurse Faculty Scholars Contribute and Benefit From Participating in Interdisciplinary Research Teams.给予与收获:护理教师学者如何通过参与跨学科研究团队做出贡献并从中受益。
Nurs Forum. 2017 Apr;52(2):133-137. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12188. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Perceptual Facilitators for and Barriers to Career Progression: A Qualitative Study With Female Early Stage Investigators in Health Sciences.职业发展的感知促进因素和障碍:健康科学领域女性早期研究者的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2021 Apr 1;96(4):576-584. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003902.
4
The impact of centers and institutes on faculty life: findings from a study of basic science and internal medicine faculty at research-intensive medical schools.中心与机构对教员生活的影响:对研究密集型医学院校基础科学和内科教员的一项研究结果
Acad Med. 2006 Aug;81(8):734-43. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200608000-00012.
5
Keys to academic success for under-represented minority young investigators: recommendations from the Research in Academic Pediatrics Initiative on Diversity (RAPID) National Advisory Committee.学术成功的关键:代表性不足的少数族裔青年研究员的建议:来自多样性学术儿科学倡议(RAPID)国家顾问委员会的建议。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 18;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0995-1.
6
An integrated approach to evaluate faculty members' research performance.一种评估教员研究绩效的综合方法。
Acad Med. 2009 Nov;84(11):1610-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2364.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Assessment of Translational and Interdisciplinary Clinical Research at an Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.俄克拉荷马健康科学中心的转化与跨学科临床研究评估
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2015 Mar;108(3):93-101.
9
Contributions of international medical graduates to US biomedical research: The experience of US medical schools.国际医学毕业生对美国生物医学研究的贡献:美国医学院校的经验
J Investig Med. 2007 Dec;55(8):410-4. doi: 10.2310/6650.2007.00025.
10
"Taking your place at the table": an autoethnographic study of chaplains' participation on an interdisciplinary research team.“在团队中占据一席之地”:一项关于牧师参与跨学科研究团队的自我民族志研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 May 2;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0006-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.采用团队科学方法进行研究的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04619-0.
2
An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.转化科学团队团队发展干预措施的综合综述与实用指南:一刀切并不适用。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 9;5(1):e198. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.832. eCollection 2021.
3
The Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Consortium: A Blueprint for Inclusive Excellence.少数民族机构研究中心(RCMI)联盟:包容性卓越的蓝图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136848.
4
Collaborative relationships in translational medical research among Chinese clinicians: an internet-based cross-sectional survey.中文临床医生在转化医学研究中的合作关系:基于互联网的横断面调查。
J Transl Med. 2021 Jun 5;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02911-5.
5
Measuring motivation for team science collaboration in health teams.衡量健康团队中团队科学合作的动机。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 21;5(1):e84. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.567.
6
A mixed-methods study to explore opinions of research translation held by researchers working in a Centre of Research Excellence in Australia.一项混合方法研究,旨在探究澳大利亚一个卓越研究中心的研究人员对研究转化的看法。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):e022357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022357.
7
Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research.优化转化研究机会:对基础科学家和临床医生关于促进或阻碍转化研究因素的观点进行系统评价和叙述性综合分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160475. eCollection 2016.
8
Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and domain analysis.科学知识生产团队中合作准备度的个体动机和威胁指标:一项范围综述与领域分析
Heliyon. 2016 May;2(5). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00105.
9
Designing a CTSA-Based Social Network Intervention to Foster Cross-Disciplinary Team Science.设计基于临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的社交网络干预措施以促进跨学科团队科学
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):281-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12267. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.绘制团队科学学科的研究议程。
Res Eval. 2011 Jun 1;20(2):145-158. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580.
2
Facilitating research faculty participation in CBPR: development of a model based on key informant interviews.促进研究人员参与 CBPR:基于关键知情人访谈的模型开发。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00231.x.
3
Advancing the science of team science.推进团队科学的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x.
4
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.团队科学的生态学:理解跨学科合作的情境影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
5
The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.团队科学的科学:该领域概述及增刊介绍
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
6
Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity.推动团队科学的科学发展:协作与创造力。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.007.
7
Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science.衡量团队科学中的合作与跨学科整合。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020.
8
Translational research: moving discovery to practice.转化研究:将发现转化为实践。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan;81(1):126-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100029.

加入还是不加入:一项关于医学教师参与跨学科研究团队的个人促进因素和阻碍因素的调查。

To join or not to join: an investigation of individual facilitators and inhibitors of medical faculty participation in interdisciplinary research teams.

机构信息

School of Behavioral and Organizational Science, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Aug;4(4):274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00321.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00321.x
PMID:21884515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5439759/
Abstract

Interdisciplinary research (IDR) teams are an important mechanism for facilitating medical breakthroughs. This study investigates the role of individual-level predictors of the choice to join a new IDR team at a major medical institution. We collected survey data from a sample of 233 faculty members who were given the opportunity to participate in IDR teams that had recently formed around a wide range of medical topic areas. Our results suggest that even under supportive organizational conditions, some medical experts were more likely to participate than others. Specifically, basic and translational researchers, associate professors, and faculty with distinctive topic area expertise and with more experience collaborating across departmental boundaries participated at a greater rate than their peers. Our findings have implications for research, practice, and policy focused on overcoming the challenges of drawing together diverse medical experts into IDR teams with the potential to advance knowledge to prevent, cure, and treat complex medical conditions.

摘要

跨学科研究 (IDR) 团队是促进医学突破的重要机制。本研究调查了个人层面的预测因素在选择加入主要医疗机构新的 IDR 团队中的作用。我们从 233 名教员中收集了调查数据,这些教员有机会参与最近围绕广泛的医学主题领域形成的 IDR 团队。我们的结果表明,即使在支持性的组织条件下,一些医学专家也比其他人更有可能参与。具体而言,基础和转化研究人员、副教授、具有独特主题领域专业知识和更多跨部门合作经验的教员参与的比例高于同行。我们的研究结果对研究、实践和政策具有重要意义,这些研究、实践和政策旨在克服将不同医学专家纳入 IDR 团队的挑战,这些团队有可能推动知识的进步,以预防、治疗和治疗复杂的医疗状况。