School of Behavioral and Organizational Science, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Aug;4(4):274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00321.x.
Interdisciplinary research (IDR) teams are an important mechanism for facilitating medical breakthroughs. This study investigates the role of individual-level predictors of the choice to join a new IDR team at a major medical institution. We collected survey data from a sample of 233 faculty members who were given the opportunity to participate in IDR teams that had recently formed around a wide range of medical topic areas. Our results suggest that even under supportive organizational conditions, some medical experts were more likely to participate than others. Specifically, basic and translational researchers, associate professors, and faculty with distinctive topic area expertise and with more experience collaborating across departmental boundaries participated at a greater rate than their peers. Our findings have implications for research, practice, and policy focused on overcoming the challenges of drawing together diverse medical experts into IDR teams with the potential to advance knowledge to prevent, cure, and treat complex medical conditions.
跨学科研究 (IDR) 团队是促进医学突破的重要机制。本研究调查了个人层面的预测因素在选择加入主要医疗机构新的 IDR 团队中的作用。我们从 233 名教员中收集了调查数据,这些教员有机会参与最近围绕广泛的医学主题领域形成的 IDR 团队。我们的结果表明,即使在支持性的组织条件下,一些医学专家也比其他人更有可能参与。具体而言,基础和转化研究人员、副教授、具有独特主题领域专业知识和更多跨部门合作经验的教员参与的比例高于同行。我们的研究结果对研究、实践和政策具有重要意义,这些研究、实践和政策旨在克服将不同医学专家纳入 IDR 团队的挑战,这些团队有可能推动知识的进步,以预防、治疗和治疗复杂的医疗状况。