[Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice].

The API 20 EC and ATB 32 GN identification systems were compared for their ability to identify 231 coliform bacteria strains. Agreement with the identification given by conventional methods was achieved for 96.1 p. cent of strains by the API 20 EC gallery and for 95.9 p. cent by the ATB 32 GN system. Complementary tests were needed to identify 9.5 p. cent of strains using the API 20 EC system but 30.3 per cent using the ATB 32 GN system.