[两种用于鉴定临床实践中新描述或罕见的大肠埃希氏菌的系统的比较]
[Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice].
作者信息
Renaud F, Freney J, Gavini F, Boeufgras J M, Fleurette J
机构信息
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine A. Carrel, Lyon.
出版信息
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1990;48(2):111-5.
The API 20 EC and ATB 32 GN identification systems were compared for their ability to identify 231 coliform bacteria strains. Agreement with the identification given by conventional methods was achieved for 96.1 p. cent of strains by the API 20 EC gallery and for 95.9 p. cent by the ATB 32 GN system. Complementary tests were needed to identify 9.5 p. cent of strains using the API 20 EC system but 30.3 per cent using the ATB 32 GN system.
对API 20 EC和ATB 32 GN鉴定系统识别231株大肠菌群细菌的能力进行了比较。API 20 EC鉴定板对96.1%的菌株鉴定结果与传统方法一致，ATB 32 GN系统则为95.9%。使用API 20 EC系统时，需要补充试验来鉴定9.5%的菌株，而使用ATB 32 GN系统时则需要鉴定30.3%的菌株。
Zotero 插件