Freney J, Garonnat D, Bouvard V, Fleurette J
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1984;42(5):337-41.
The N/F FLOW and API 20 NE identification systems were compared for their ability to identify 182 strains of either non-fermentative or fermentative oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli. Agreement with the identification given by conventional methods was achieved for 91,7 per cent of strains by the API System but for only 81,9 per cent of strains by the N/F System. Complementary tests were needed to identify 35,4 per cent of strains using the API System but 65,2 per cent using the N/F System.
对N/F FLOW和API 20 NE鉴定系统识别182株非发酵或发酵型氧化酶阳性革兰氏阴性杆菌的能力进行了比较。API系统对91.7%的菌株鉴定结果与传统方法一致,而N/F系统仅为81.9%。使用API系统时,需要补充试验来鉴定35.4%的菌株,而使用N/F系统时则需要鉴定65.2%的菌株。