J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;41(9):633-42. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3670. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
Systematic review.
Neck pain is a common diagnosis in the physical therapy setting, yet there is no gold standard for treatment. This study is part of a growing body of literature on the use of thoracic spine thrust manipulation for the treatment of individuals with mechanical neck pain.
The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation on pain, range of motion, and self-reported function in patients with mechanical neck pain.
Six online databases were comprehensively searched from their respective inception to October 2010. The primary search terms included "thoracic mobilization," "thoracic spine mobilization," "thoracic manipulation," and "thoracic spine manipulation." Of the 44 studies assessed for inclusion, 6 randomized controlled trials were retained. Between-group mean differences and effect sizes for pretreatment-to-posttreatment change scores, using Cohen's d formula, were calculated for pain, range of motion, and subjective function at all stated time intervals.
Effect size point estimates for the pain change scores were significant for global assessment across all studies (range, 0.38-4.03) but not conclusively significant at the end range of active rotation (range, 0.02-1.79). Effect size point estimates were large among all range-of-motion change measures (range, 1.40-3.52), and the effect size point estimates of the change scores among the functional questionnaires (range, 0.47-3.64) also indicated a significant treatment effect.
Thoracic spine thrust manipulation may provide short-term improvement in patients with acute or subacute mechanical neck pain. However, the body of literature is weak, and these results may not be generalizable.
Therapy, level 1b-.
系统评价。
在物理治疗环境中,颈部疼痛是一种常见的诊断,但没有治疗的金标准。本研究是越来越多的关于胸推推扳手法治疗机械性颈痛患者的文献的一部分。
本系统评价的目的是确定胸推推扳手法对机械性颈痛患者疼痛、活动范围和自我报告功能的影响。
从各数据库建立起至 2010 年 10 月,全面检索了 6 个在线数据库。主要检索词包括“胸椎松动术”、“胸椎脊柱松动术”、“胸椎手法”和“胸椎脊柱手法”。在纳入的 44 项研究中,有 6 项随机对照试验被保留。使用 Cohen 的 d 公式,计算了所有规定时间间隔的疼痛、活动范围和主观功能的治疗前-治疗后变化评分的组间平均差异和效应量。
所有研究的总体评估的疼痛变化评分的效应量估计值均具有统计学意义(范围,0.38-4.03),但在主动旋转终末范围(范围,0.02-1.79)无显著意义。所有活动范围变化测量的效应量估计值均较大(范围,1.40-3.52),功能问卷的变化评分的效应量估计值(范围,0.47-3.64)也表明治疗效果显著。
胸推推扳手法可能为急性或亚急性机械性颈痛患者提供短期改善。然而,文献量较少,这些结果可能不具有普遍性。
治疗,1b 级。