School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Aug;5(8):e1278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001278. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
The effects of various dengue control measures have been investigated in previous studies. The aim of this review was to investigate the relative effectiveness (RE) of different educational messages embedded in a community-based approach on the incidence of Aedes aegypti larvae using entomological measures as outcomes.
A systematic electronic search using Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was carried out to March 2010. Previous systematic reviews were also assessed. Data concerning interventions, outcomes, effect size and study design were extracted. Basic meta-analyses were done for pooled effect size, heterogeneity and publication bias using Comprehensive Meta-analysis. Further analysis of heterogeneitity was done by multi-level modelling using MLwiN. 21 publications with 22 separate studies were included in this review. Meta-analysis of these 22 pooled studies showed an RE of 0.25 (95% CI 0.17-0.37), but with substantial heterogeneity (Cochran's Q = 1254, df = 21, p = < 0.001,). Further analysis of this heterogeneity showed that over 60% of between study variance could be explained by just two variables; whether or not studies used historic or contemporary controls and time from intervention to assessment. When analyses were restricted to those studies using contemporary control, there was a polynomial relationship between effectiveness and time to assessment. Whether or not chemicals or other control measures were used did not appear have any effect on intervention effectiveness.
The results suggest that such measures do appear to be effective at reducing entomological indices. However, those studies that use historical controls almost certainly overestimate the value of interventions. There is evidence that interventions are most effective some 18 to 24 months after the intervention but then subsequently decline.
以往的研究已经调查了各种登革热控制措施的效果。 本研究旨在调查基于社区的方法中嵌入的不同教育信息对伊蚊幼虫发病率的相对效果(RE),以昆虫学措施作为结果。
系统检索了 Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library,检索时间截至 2010 年 3 月。还评估了以前的系统评价。提取有关干预措施、结果、效应量和研究设计的数据。使用 Comprehensive Meta-analysis 进行综合荟萃分析,对 pooled 效应量、异质性和发表偏倚进行基本分析。使用 MLwiN 进行多层次建模对异质性进行进一步分析。 本研究共纳入 21 项研究,共 22 项独立研究。这 22 项汇总研究的荟萃分析显示,RE 为 0.25(95% CI 0.17-0.37),但存在很大的异质性(Cochran's Q = 1254,df = 21,p < 0.001)。对这种异质性的进一步分析表明,研究之间的差异有超过 60%可以用两个变量来解释:研究是否使用了历史或当代对照以及干预措施与评估之间的时间。当分析仅限于使用当代对照的研究时,有效性与评估时间之间存在多项式关系。是否使用化学品或其他控制措施似乎对干预效果没有影响。
结果表明,这些措施似乎确实能有效降低昆虫学指数。然而,使用历史对照的研究几乎肯定高估了干预措施的价值。有证据表明,干预措施在干预后 18 至 24 个月最为有效,但随后会下降。