Basso César, García da Rosa Elsa, Lairihoy Rosario, Caffera Ruben M, Roche Ingrid, González Cristina, da Rosa Ricardo, Gularte Alexis, Alfonso-Sierra Eduardo, Petzold Max, Kroeger Axel, Sommerfeld Johannes
Unidad de Entomología, Departamento de Protección Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Departamento de Parasitología Veterinaria, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Nov;97(5):1428-1436. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0061. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
To contribute to the prevention of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, a process of scaling up an innovative intervention to reduce habitats, was carried out in the city of Salto (Uruguay) based on a transdisciplinary analysis of the eco-bio-social determinants. The intervention in one-third of the city included the distributions of plastic bags for all households to collect all discarded water containers that were recollected by the Ministry of Health and the Municipality vector control services. The results were evaluated in 20 randomly assigned clusters of 100 households each, in the intervention and control arm. The intervention resulted in a significantly larger decrease in the number of pupae per person index (as a proxy for adult vector abundance) than the corresponding decrease in the control areas (both areas decreased by winter effects). The reduction of intervention costs ("incremental costs") in relation to routine vector control activities was 46%. Community participation increased the collaboration with the intervention program considerably (from 48% of bags handed back out of the total of bags delivered to 59% of bags handed back). Although the costs increased by 26% compared with intervention without community participation, the acceptability of actions by residents increased from 66% to 78%.
为助力登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病的预防工作,基于对生态 - 生物 - 社会决定因素的跨学科分析,在萨尔托市(乌拉圭)开展了一项扩大创新性干预措施以减少蚊虫滋生地的行动。该行动覆盖该市三分之一区域,包括向所有家庭分发塑料袋,用于收集所有废弃的盛水容器,这些容器由卫生部和市病媒控制服务部门回收。在干预组和对照组中,分别对20个随机分配的、每组100户家庭的群组进行了结果评估。与对照区域相应的减少量相比,干预措施使每人蛹数指数(作为成蚊数量的替代指标)显著更大幅度地下降(两个区域均因冬季影响而减少)。与常规病媒控制活动相比,干预成本(“增量成本”)降低了46%。社区参与显著增强了与干预项目的合作(交回的袋子占发放袋子总数的比例从48%提高到59%)。尽管与无社区参与的干预相比成本增加了26%,但居民对行动的接受度从66%提高到了78%。