Fishback Shelby J, Pickhardt Perry J, Bhalla Sanjeev, Menias Christine O, Congdon Robert G, Macari Michael
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2011 Dec;18(6):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-0982-3. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and CT findings in patients with symptomatic colonoscopy-induced splenic rupture, and to assess for common features among this cohort. Multi-center search yielded 11 adults with symptomatic splenic injury related to colonoscopy. Workup included abdominal CT in 10 (91%) cases and abdominal radiography in two patients (one patient had both). Colonoscopy findings, post-procedural course, and CT findings were systematically reviewed. Mean patient age was 62.2 years (range, 51-84 years); 8 (73%) of 11 were female. The majority (64%) of colonoscopies were for screening. No immediate complications were reported at optical colonoscopy; tortuosity/redundancy was noted in five cases. Except for a small (8 mm) polyp in one case and a large (10 mm) polyp in another, the remaining nine patients had either diminutive or no polyps. Only one patient presented with hemodynamic instability during post-colonoscopy recovery; the other ten had a delayed presentation ranging from 8 h to 8 days (mean, 2.1 days). All 11 patients presented with abdominal pain. CT was diagnostic for splenic injury with subcaspular and/or perisplenic hematoma in all ten CT cases. Hemoperitoneum was present in eight, visible splenic laceration in three cases, and splenic artery pseudoaneurysm in one case. Five patients underwent splenectomy (four emergent) and six patients were treated conservatively. Average hospital stay was 5.5 days (range, 3-10 days). Colonoscopy-induced splenic rupture characteristically presents as a delayed and often serious complication. In cases of apparent non-traumatic splenic hematoma or rupture at CT, eliciting a history of recent colonoscopy may identify the etiology.
本研究旨在调查有症状的结肠镜检查引起脾破裂患者的临床及CT表现,并评估该队列患者的共同特征。多中心检索发现11例成人有与结肠镜检查相关的有症状脾损伤。检查包括10例(91%)患者行腹部CT,2例患者行腹部X线检查(1例患者两者均有)。系统回顾结肠镜检查结果、术后病程及CT表现。患者平均年龄为62.2岁(范围51 - 84岁);11例中有8例(73%)为女性。大多数(64%)结肠镜检查是用于筛查。结肠镜检查时未报告即刻并发症;5例发现肠管迂曲/冗长。除1例有小(8mm)息肉、另1例有大(10mm)息肉外,其余9例患者息肉极小或无息肉。结肠镜检查后恢复过程中仅1例患者出现血流动力学不稳定;其他10例患者出现延迟表现,时间从8小时至8天不等(平均2.1天)。所有11例患者均有腹痛。10例行CT检查的病例中,CT均诊断为脾损伤伴包膜下和/或脾周血肿。8例有腹腔积血,3例可见脾裂伤,1例有脾动脉假性动脉瘤。5例患者接受了脾切除术(4例急诊),6例患者接受保守治疗。平均住院时间为5.5天(范围3 - 10天)。结肠镜检查引起的脾破裂典型表现为延迟出现且常为严重并发症。在CT显示明显非创伤性脾血肿或破裂的病例中,询问近期结肠镜检查史可能有助于明确病因。