Laboratory of Immunotoxicology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 101 Dong-In, Jung-Gu, Daegu 700-422, Republic of Korea.
Biomaterials. 2011 Dec;32(35):9434-43. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.042. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Mesoporous silica (MPS), synthesized via the supramolecular polymer templating method, is one of the most attractive nanomaterials for biomedical applications, such as drug delivery systems, labeling, and tissue engineering. The significant difference between MPS and general silica (colloidal silica) is the pore architectures, such as specific surface area and pore volume. The pore structures of nanomaterials have been considered to be one of the key conditions, causing nanotoxicity due to their different efficiency of cellular uptake and immune response. We first studied the influence of pore structural conditions of silica nanoparticles on both inflammation and apoptosis, in vitro and in vivo, by comparing MPS and colloidal silica, and defined underlying mechanisms of action. Both the MPS and colloidal silica nanoparticles are produced by almost similar synthetic conditions, except the use of polymer template for MPS. The specific surface area of colloidal silica and MPS was 40 and 1150 m(2) g(-1), respectively, while other conditions, including particle size (100 nm) and shape (spherical), were kept constant. In both MTT assay and FACS analysis, MPS nanoparticles showed significantly less cytotoxicity and apoptotic cell death than colloidal silica nanoparticles. MPS nanoparticles induced lower expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, in macrophages. The reduced inflammatory response and apoptosis elicited by MPS nanoparticles were resulting from the reduction of mitogen-activated protein kinases, nuclear factor-κB, and caspase 3. In addition, using the local lymph node assay, a standalone in vivo method for hazard identification of contact hypersensitivity, we showed that colloidal silica nanoparticles act as an immunogenic sensitizer and induce contact hypersensitivity but not MPS nanoparticles. In conclusion, the pore architecture of silica nanoparticles greatly influences their biocompatibility and should be carefully designed. The MPS nanoparticles exhibit better biocompatibility than colloidal silica and promise excellent potential usage in the field of biomedical and biotechnological applications.
介孔硅(MPS)通过超分子聚合物模板法合成,是最具吸引力的生物医学应用纳米材料之一,如药物传递系统、标记和组织工程。MPS 与普通硅(胶体硅)的显著区别在于孔结构,如比表面积和孔体积。纳米材料的孔结构被认为是导致纳米毒性的关键条件之一,因为它们的细胞摄取效率和免疫反应不同。我们首先通过比较 MPS 和胶体硅,研究了硅纳米粒子的孔结构条件对体外和体内炎症和细胞凋亡的影响,并确定了作用机制。MPS 和胶体硅纳米粒子都是通过几乎相似的合成条件制备的,只是 MPS 使用了聚合物模板。胶体硅和 MPS 的比表面积分别为 40 和 1150 m(2) g(-1),而其他条件,包括粒径(100nm)和形状(球形)保持不变。在 MTT 测定和 FACS 分析中,MPS 纳米粒子的细胞毒性和细胞凋亡率明显低于胶体硅纳米粒子。MPS 纳米粒子诱导巨噬细胞中促炎细胞因子(如肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-1β 和白细胞介素-6)的表达降低。MPS 纳米粒子引起的炎症反应和细胞凋亡减少是由于丝裂原活化蛋白激酶、核因子-κB 和半胱天冬酶 3 的减少。此外,使用局部淋巴结测定法,一种用于鉴定接触致敏的独立体内方法,我们表明胶体硅纳米粒子作为一种免疫原性致敏剂,可诱导接触致敏,但 MPS 纳米粒子不会。总之,硅纳米粒子的孔结构极大地影响了它们的生物相容性,应仔细设计。MPS 纳米粒子比胶体硅具有更好的生物相容性,有望在生物医学和生物技术应用领域具有优异的潜在用途。