Department of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jan;59(1):108-16. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
Patient responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), notoriously difficult to measure, has attracted attention for its association with mortality. We defined categories of ESA responsiveness and attempted to clarify their association with mortality.
Cohort study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Data from Japan's dialysis registry (2005-2006), including 95,460 adult hemodialysis patients who received ESAs.
We defined 6 categories of ESA responsiveness based on a combination of ESA dosage (low [<6,000 U/wk] or high [≥6,000 U/wk]) and hemoglobin level (low [<10 g/dL], medium [10-11.9 g/dL], or high [≥12 g/dL]), with medium hemoglobin level and low-dose ESA therapy as the reference category.
All-cause and cardiovascular mortality during 1-year follow-up.
HRs were estimated using a Cox model for the association between responsiveness categories and mortality, adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, postdialysis weight, dialysis duration, comorbid conditions, serum albumin level, and transferrin saturation.
Median ESA dosage (4,500-5,999 U/wk) was used as a cutoff point, and mean hemoglobin level was 10.1 g/dL in our cohort. Of 95,460 patients during follow-up, 7,205 (7.5%) died of all causes, including 5,586 (5.9%) cardiovascular deaths. Low hemoglobin levels and high-dose ESA therapy were both associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HRs, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09-1.27] for low hemoglobin level with low-dose ESA and 1.44 [95% CI, 1.34-1.55] for medium hemoglobin level with high-dose ESA). Adjusted HRs for high-dose ESA with low hemoglobin level (hyporesponsiveness) were 1.94 (95% CI, 1.82-2.07) for all-cause and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.88-2.17) for cardiovascular mortality. We also noted the interaction between ESA dosage and hemoglobin level on all-cause mortality (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.002).
Potential residual confounding from unmeasured factors and single measurement of predictors.
Mortality can be affected by ESA responsiveness, which may include independent and interactive effects of ESA dose and hemoglobin level. Responsiveness category has prognostic importance and clinical relevance in anemia management.
促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESAs)的患者反应性很难衡量,但其与死亡率相关,这一特性引起了人们的关注。我们定义了 ESA 反应性的类别,并试图阐明其与死亡率的关系。
队列研究。
这项研究的数据来自日本的透析登记处(2005-2006 年),包括 95460 名接受 ESAs 治疗的成年血液透析患者。
我们根据 ESA 剂量(低 [<6000 U/周] 或高 [≥6000 U/周])和血红蛋白水平(低 [<10 g/dL]、中 [10-11.9 g/dL] 或高 [≥12 g/dL])相结合,定义了 6 种 ESA 反应性类别,将中血红蛋白水平和低剂量 ESA 治疗作为参考类别。
1 年随访期间的全因和心血管死亡率。
使用 Cox 模型估计反应性类别与死亡率之间的关联,调整了年龄、性别、透析后体重、透析时间、合并症、血清白蛋白水平和转铁蛋白饱和度等潜在混杂因素。
以 4500-5999 U/周的中位 ESA 剂量作为截断值,我们队列的平均血红蛋白水平为 10.1 g/dL。在随访期间的 95460 名患者中,有 7205 名(7.5%)死于各种原因,其中 5586 名(5.9%)死于心血管疾病。低血红蛋白水平和高剂量 ESA 治疗均与全因死亡率相关(校正后的 HR,低剂量 ESA 时低血红蛋白水平为 1.18 [95%CI,1.09-1.27],高剂量 ESA 时中血红蛋白水平为 1.44 [95%CI,1.34-1.55])。低血红蛋白水平和高剂量 ESA(低反应性)的校正后 HR 分别为全因死亡 1.94(95%CI,1.82-2.07)和心血管死亡 2.02(95%CI,1.88-2.17)。我们还注意到 ESA 剂量和血红蛋白水平对全因死亡率的相互作用(似然比检验,P = 0.002)。
可能存在未测量因素的残余混杂和预测因素的单次测量。
死亡率可能受到 ESA 反应性的影响,这可能包括 ESA 剂量和血红蛋白水平的独立和交互作用。反应性类别在贫血管理中具有预后意义和临床相关性。