• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺筛查对良、预后差乳腺癌检出的影响。

Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers.

机构信息

University California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Dec;130(3):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1748-z. Epub 2011 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-011-1748-z
PMID:21892702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5646368/
Abstract

We sought to compare the molecular signature of node negative cancers from two cohorts 15 years apart, to determine if there is molecular evidence of increase in low and ultralow risk cancers over time. We studied the impact of age, time period of diagnosis, and mammographic screening on biology of tumors where The Netherlands Cancer Institute 70-gene prognosis signature was generated as part of 2 validation series, one retrospective (1984-1992), Cohort 1, and one prospective (2004-2006), Cohort 2. A total of 866 patients were analyzed. Regardless of time period of diagnosis, the proportion of T1, grade 1, hormone receptor positive (HR) tumors, and good prognosis by 70-gene signature significantly increases as age increases (P < 0.01). In women aged 49-60, the time period of diagnosis significantly affects the proportion of cancers that were NKI 70-gene low risk: 40.6% (67/165) compared with 58% (119/205) for Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. This is in contrast to the absence of a significant change for women under age 40, where 25% (17/68) and 30% (17/56) were low risk in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In women aged 49-60, using an ultralow risk threshold of the 70-gene signature, 10% of tumors in Cohort 1 were ultralow risk compared with 30% for women with screen-detected cancers in Cohort 2. Older age and method of detection (screening) are associated with a higher likelihood of a biologically low risk tumor. In women over age 50, biologically low risk tumors are frequent and tools that classify risk may minimize overtreatment.

摘要

我们试图比较两个队列中 15 年间隔的阴性淋巴结癌症的分子特征,以确定随着时间的推移是否有低危和超低危癌症的分子证据增加。我们研究了年龄、诊断时间段和乳房 X 线筛查对肿瘤生物学的影响,荷兰癌症研究所的 70 基因预后签名是作为两个验证系列的一部分生成的,一个是回顾性的(1984-1992),队列 1,另一个是前瞻性的(2004-2006),队列 2。共分析了 866 例患者。无论诊断时间段如何,随着年龄的增加,T1、1 级、激素受体阳性(HR)肿瘤的比例以及 70 基因签名的良好预后显著增加(P < 0.01)。在 49-60 岁的女性中,诊断时间段显著影响 NKI 70 基因低风险癌症的比例:队列 1 为 40.6%(67/165),队列 2 为 58%(119/205)。相比之下,40 岁以下的女性没有显著变化,队列 1 和队列 2 中分别有 25%(17/68)和 30%(17/56)为低风险。在 49-60 岁的女性中,使用 70 基因签名的超低风险阈值,队列 1 中有 10%的肿瘤为超低风险,而队列 2 中筛查发现的癌症中有 30%为超低风险。年龄较大和检测方法(筛查)与生物学低风险肿瘤的可能性增加相关。在 50 岁以上的女性中,生物学上的低危肿瘤很常见,并且分类风险的工具可能会最大限度地减少过度治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/0146660ee09f/nihms903242f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/90da3414d2c1/nihms903242f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/275b6fb27d79/nihms903242f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/0146660ee09f/nihms903242f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/90da3414d2c1/nihms903242f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/275b6fb27d79/nihms903242f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e718/5646368/0146660ee09f/nihms903242f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers.乳腺筛查对良、预后差乳腺癌检出的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Dec;130(3):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1748-z. Epub 2011 Sep 4.
2
Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers.乳腺 X 线筛查可发现低危肿瘤生物学特征的乳腺癌。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2830-5. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
3
Use of Molecular Tools to Identify Patients With Indolent Breast Cancers With Ultralow Risk Over 2 Decades.利用分子工具在过去 20 年中识别具有超低风险的惰性乳腺癌患者。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1503-1510. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1261.
4
Using tumor phenotype, histological tumor distribution, and mammographic appearance to explain the survival differences between screen-detected and clinically detected breast cancers.利用肿瘤表型、组织学肿瘤分布和乳房X线摄影表现来解释筛查发现和临床发现的乳腺癌之间的生存差异。
APMIS. 2014 Aug;122(8):699-707. doi: 10.1111/apm.12294.
5
Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program.全国性筛查项目中筛查发现的和间期性乳腺癌不同表型的乳腺钼靶及临床特征
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(2):403-15. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3623-9. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.与单纯二维钼靶(2D 钼靶)相比,采用获得性或合成二维钼靶(2D 钼靶)的断层合成乳腺 X 线摄影术(3D 乳腺 X 线摄影术)进行乳腺癌筛查(STORM-2):一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1105-1113. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.乳腺肿瘤特征作为乳腺钼靶检测的预测指标:间期癌与筛查发现癌的比较
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Dec 1;91(23):2020-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.23.2020.
8
Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program.与安大略省乳腺癌筛查计划中乳腺癌的乳房 X 线摄影检测相关的肿瘤特征。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):942-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr138. Epub 2011 May 3.
9
Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.新型乳腺钼靶图像特征可区分间期癌和筛查发现的乳腺癌:一项病例对照研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 5;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0761-x.
10
Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers.间期和筛查性乳腺癌的分子比较。
J Pathol. 2019 Jun;248(2):243-252. doi: 10.1002/path.5251. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential role of vacuum-assisted procedures in resecting breast cancers and highlighting selection criteria to support future trials.真空辅助手术在乳腺癌切除中的潜在作用及突出支持未来试验的选择标准。
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 21;13:1239574. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1239574. eCollection 2023.
2
Limiting systemic endocrine overtreatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients with an ultralow classification of the 70-gene signature.采用 70 基因签名超低分类法限制绝经后乳腺癌患者的全身内分泌过度治疗。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):265-278. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06618-z. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Solving the overdiagnosis dilemma.解决过度诊断困境。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):582-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq119. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
2
Overdiagnosis in cancer.癌症过度诊断。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq099. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
3
Metastatic potential of T1 breast cancer can be predicted by the 70-gene MammaPrint signature.T1 期乳腺癌的转移潜能可通过 70 基因 MammaPrint 签名预测。
基于患者就诊表现的安大略省乳腺癌诊断差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Apr 5;10(2):E313-E330. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210254. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
4
The Pushing Sign for Early Skin Tethering in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌早期皮肤粘连的推压征
Cureus. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):e20471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20471. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
The WISDOM study: a new approach to screening can and should be tested.智慧研究:一种新的筛查方法能够且应该得到检验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;189(3):593-598. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06346-w. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Combining method of detection and 70-gene signature for enhanced prognostication of breast cancer.联合检测方法和 70 基因特征以增强乳腺癌的预后判断。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Sep;189(2):399-410. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06315-3. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
Tumor-associated lymphocytes and macrophages are related to stromal elastosis and vascular invasion in breast cancer.肿瘤相关淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞与乳腺癌中的基质弹性蛋白变性和血管浸润有关。
J Pathol Clin Res. 2021 Sep;7(5):517-527. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.226. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Fibulin-2 expression associates with vascular invasion and patient survival in breast cancer.纤维连接蛋白-2 的表达与乳腺癌的血管浸润和患者生存相关。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 9;16(4):e0249767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249767. eCollection 2021.
9
Poor Biological Factors and Prognosis of Interval Breast Cancers: Long-Term Results of Bahçeşehir (Istanbul) Breast Cancer Screening Project in Turkey.间期乳腺癌的不良生物学因素与预后:土耳其巴赫切希尔(伊斯坦布尔)乳腺癌筛查项目的长期结果
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jul;6:1103-1113. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00145.
10
Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis.全数字化乳腺摄影与屏片乳腺摄影在人群筛查中的影响:荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jan 4;113(1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa080.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1406-13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0902-x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
4
Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.重新思考乳腺癌和前列腺癌的筛查
JAMA. 2009 Oct 21;302(15):1685-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1498.
5
The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age.70 基因预后指标可预测 55-70 岁乳腺癌患者的早期转移。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Apr;21(4):717-722. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp388. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
6
Flawed inferences about screening mammography's benefit based on observational data.基于观察性数据对乳腺钼靶筛查益处的错误推断。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):639-40; author reply 641-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9341. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
7
The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.通过乳腺钼靶筛查发现的浸润性乳腺癌的自然史。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2311-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311.
8
Impressive time-related influence of the Dutch screening programme on breast cancer incidence and mortality, 1975-2006.1975 - 2006年荷兰筛查计划对乳腺癌发病率和死亡率产生的与时间相关的显著影响。
Int J Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;123(8):1929-34. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23736.
9
Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening.在乳腺钼靶筛查及筛查外检测到的乳腺癌分子亚型。
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 1;14(13):4103-10. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5003.
10
The screening mammography paradox: better when found, perhaps better not to find.乳腺筛查钼靶检查的悖论:发现时情况较好,或许不发现更好。
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jun 3;98(11):1729-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604349. Epub 2008 May 27.