Thangarasu Sudhagar, Natarajan Piruthiviraj, Rajavelu Parivalavan, Rajagopalan Arjun, Seelinger Devey Jeremy S
Dept, of International Emergency Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave,, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep 5;4:57. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-57.
Fever is a common presenting complaint in the developing world, but there is a paucity of literature to guide investigation and treatment of the adult patient presenting with fever and no localizing symptoms.
The objective of this study was to devise a standardized protocol for the evaluation and treatment of febrile adult patients who have no localizing symptoms in order to reduce unnecessary testing and inappropriate antimicrobial use. After devising the protocol, a pilot study was performed to assess its feasibility in the emergency department.
A protocol was formulated for adult patients presenting with fever who had no clinical evidence of sepsis and no localizing symptoms to suggest the etiology of their fever. Investigations were based on duration of fever with no investigations indicated prior to day 3. Treatment was guided by results of investigations. A pilot study was performed after protocol implementation, wherein data were collected on successive adult patients presenting with fever.
During the 6-week study period, 342 patients presented with fever, 209 of whom fit the parameters of the protocol, with 113 of these patients presenting on the 1st or 2nd day of fever. All patients experienced defervescence of fever, with ten patients being lost to follow-up. Of the patients presenting on day 1 or 2 of fever, 75.2% (85/113) defervesced without the need for testing; 53.1% (60/113) experienced defervescence without the need for antimicrobial therapy.
Implementation of this rational, standardized protocol for the assessment and treatment of stable adult patients presenting with acute undifferentiated febrile illness can lead to reduced rates of testing and antimicrobial use. A prospective, controlled trial will be required to confirm these findings and to assess additional safety outcome measures.
发热是发展中国家常见的就诊主诉,但针对无定位症状的成年发热患者的检查和治疗指导文献匮乏。
本研究的目的是制定一项标准化方案,用于评估和治疗无定位症状的发热成年患者,以减少不必要的检查和不恰当的抗菌药物使用。制定该方案后,进行了一项试点研究以评估其在急诊科的可行性。
为无脓毒症临床证据且无定位症状提示发热病因的成年发热患者制定了一项方案。检查基于发热持续时间,第3天之前无需进行检查。治疗以检查结果为指导。方案实施后进行了一项试点研究,收集了连续就诊的成年发热患者的数据。
在为期6周的研究期间,342例患者出现发热,其中209例符合方案参数,其中113例患者在发热第1天或第2天就诊。所有患者发热均消退,10例患者失访。在发热第1天或第2天就诊的患者中,75.2%(85/113)未经检查发热即消退;53.1%(60/113)未经抗菌药物治疗发热即消退。
实施这一合理、标准化的方案来评估和治疗表现为急性未分化发热疾病的稳定成年患者,可降低检查率和抗菌药物使用率。需要进行一项前瞻性对照试验来证实这些发现并评估其他安全性结局指标。