Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA.
Prev Med. 2012 Jan;54(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.029. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
To determine whether spiritual and religious identities predict complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use above and beyond other known influences such as gender, region of residence, social status, personality, health, and access to conventional medicine.
Analyzing data from the 1995-1996 National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (n=3032), this study examines the correlations between four aspects of spirituality/religiousness-i.e., spiritual only, religious only, both spiritual and religious, and neither spiritual nor religious-and six measures of CAM.
Compared with spiritual only persons, the odds of using energy therapies are 86% lower for spiritual and religious persons, 65% lower for religious only persons, and 52% lower for neither spiritual nor religious persons. Compared to spiritual only persons, spiritual and religious individuals are 43% more likely to use body-mind therapies in general; however, when this category does not contain prayer, meditation, or spiritual healing, they are 44% less likely. Religious only individuals are disinclined toward CAM use.
After controlling for established predictors including educational attainment, personality, social support, and access to conventional medicine, the present study demonstrates that spirituality and religiousness are associated, in unique ways, with CAM use. Additional research on this topic is clearly warranted.
确定精神和宗教身份是否能预测补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用,超过其他已知的影响因素,如性别、居住地区、社会地位、个性、健康和获得常规医学的机会。
本研究分析了来自美国 1995-1996 年中年发展的全国调查的数据(n=3032),检查了四个方面的精神/宗教信仰与六种 CAM 措施之间的相关性,即仅精神方面、仅宗教方面、精神和宗教方面都有、精神和宗教方面都没有。
与仅精神方面的人相比,精神和宗教方面的人使用能量疗法的几率低 86%,仅宗教方面的人低 65%,既没有精神也没有宗教方面的人低 52%。与仅精神方面的人相比,精神和宗教方面的人更有可能总体上使用身心疗法;然而,当这个类别不包含祈祷、冥想或精神治疗时,他们的可能性低 44%。仅宗教方面的人不倾向于使用 CAM。
在控制了包括教育程度、个性、社会支持和获得常规医学的机会在内的既定预测因素后,本研究表明,精神和宗教信仰以独特的方式与 CAM 的使用相关。显然需要对这个话题进行更多的研究。