Pirnejad Habibollah, Niazkhani Zahra, Aarts Jos, Bal Roland
Department of Medical Informatics, Urmia University of Medical Science, Urmia, Iran.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:392-6.
Two different information systems with respect to their ability to afford clinicians' needs in the chemotherapy medication process were implemented in a large Dutch academic hospital. A commercially available Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) system was not appreciated because clinicians believed that it could not support complex chemotherapy process. Later, a home-grown IT system with the capability of prescribing chemotherapy medications based on standard care protocols was appreciated and fully used by clinicians. We evaluated both systems from their users' perspective to find the sources of clinicians' preference and to trace them back to their Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC).
在一家大型荷兰学术医院实施了两种不同的信息系统，它们在满足临床医生化疗用药过程需求的能力方面有所不同。一种市售的计算机化医生医嘱录入（CPOE）系统未得到认可，因为临床医生认为它无法支持复杂的化疗过程。后来，一个基于标准护理协议能够开具化疗药物的自主研发的信息技术系统得到了临床医生的认可并被充分使用。我们从用户角度对这两种系统进行了评估，以找出临床医生偏好的来源，并将其追溯到系统开发生命周期（SDLC）。
