Suppr超能文献

刺激光谱对近距离声源距离感知的影响。

Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources.

机构信息

Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence, Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovakia.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1530-41. doi: 10.1121/1.3613705.

Abstract

The effects of stimulus frequency and bandwidth on distance perception were examined for nearby sources in simulated reverberant space. Sources to the side [containing reverberation-related cues and interaural level difference (ILD) cues] and to the front (without ILDs) were simulated. Listeners judged the distance of noise bursts presented at a randomly roving level from simulated distances ranging from 0.15 to 1.7 m. Six stimuli were tested, varying in center frequency (300-5700 Hz) and bandwidth (200-5400 Hz). Performance, measured as the correlation between simulated and response distances, was worse for frontal than for lateral sources. For both simulated directions, performance was inversely proportional to the low-frequency stimulus cutoff, independent of stimulus bandwidth. The dependence of performance on frequency was stronger for frontal sources. These correlation results were well summarized by considering how mean response, as opposed to response variance, changed with stimulus direction and spectrum: (1) little bias was observed for lateral sources, but listeners consistently overestimated distance for frontal nearby sources; (2) for both directions, increasing the low-frequency cut-off reduced the range of responses. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that listeners used a direction-independent but frequency-dependent mapping of a reverberation-related cue, not the ILD cue, to judge source distance.

摘要

本研究旨在考察在模拟混响环境中,近距声源刺激频率和带宽对距离感知的影响。声源位于侧面(包含与混响相关的线索和强度差线索)和正面(无强度差线索)。实验中,被试判断随机移动的噪声脉冲的距离,模拟距离范围为 0.15 米至 1.7 米。共测试了 6 种刺激,中心频率(300-5700Hz)和带宽(200-5400Hz)各有不同。以模拟距离和反应距离之间的相关性作为衡量标准,结果显示正面声源的表现比侧面声源差。对于这两种模拟方向,性能与低频刺激截止频率呈反比,而与刺激带宽无关。对于正面声源,性能对频率的依赖性更强。这些相关结果可以通过考虑平均反应(而不是反应方差)随刺激方向和频谱的变化来很好地总结:(1)对于侧面声源,几乎没有观察到偏差,但对于正面近距声源,被试总是高估距离;(2)对于两个方向,增加低频截止频率都会减少反应范围。这些结果与以下假设一致,即被试使用与方向无关但与频率相关的混响相关线索映射,而不是强度差线索,来判断声源距离。

相似文献

3
Neuronal representations of distance in human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层中距离的神经元表示。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):11019-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119496109. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Piezoelectric nanofiber-based intelligent hearing system.基于压电纳米纤维的智能听力系统。
Sci Adv. 2025 May 9;11(19):eadl2741. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl2741. Epub 2025 May 7.
4
Adaptation to Reverberation for Speech Perception: A Systematic Review.适应混响的语音感知:系统评价。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241273399. doi: 10.1177/23312165241273399.
5
Auditory localization: a comprehensive practical review.听觉定位:全面的实践综述。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1408073. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408073. eCollection 2024.
7
Head movement and its relation to hearing.头部运动及其与听力的关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 28;14:1183303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183303. eCollection 2023.
8
A quick method for determining the relative minimum audible distance using sound images.利用声影测定相对可听距离的快速方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2718-2730. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02663-y. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
9
10
Benefits of active listening during 3D sound localization.主动倾听在三维声音定位中的好处。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Nov;240(11):2817-2833. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06456-x. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

5
Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.直达混响能量比灵敏度
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2110-7. doi: 10.1121/1.1506692.
6
Interaural level differences and the level-meter model.耳间声级差与声级计模型。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1037-45. doi: 10.1121/1.1500759.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验