• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉僵硬度和中心波反射可预测肾移植受者的预后。

Aortic stiffness and central wave reflections predict outcome in renal transplant recipients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Section, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2011 Nov;58(5):833-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176594. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176594
PMID:21896935
Abstract

Although renal transplantation improves survival, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain significantly elevated compared with nonrenal populations. The negative impact of traditional, uremia-related, and transplantation-related risk factors in this process remains, however, largely unexplored. Surrogate markers such as aortic stiffness and central wave reflections may lead to more accurate cardiovascular risk stratification, but outcome data in renal transplant recipients are scarce. We aimed to establish the prognostic significance of these markers for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events in renal transplant recipients. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, central augmentation pressure, and central augmentation index were measured in a cohort of 512 renal transplant recipients using the SphygmoCor system. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, 20 fatal and 75 nonfatal cardiovascular events were recorded. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve for predicting cardiovascular events was 0.718 (95% CI 0.659-0.776) for pulse wave velocity, 0.670 (95% CI 0.604-0.736) for central augmentation pressure, and 0.595 (95% CI 0.529-0.660) for central augmentation index. When we accounted for age, gender, and C-reactive protein in Cox-regression analysis, pulse wave velocity (hazard ratio: 1.349 per 1 SD increase; 95% CI 1.104-1.649; P=0.003) and central augmentation pressure (hazard ratio: 1.487 per 1 SD increase; 95% CI 1.219-1.814; P<0.001) remained independent predictors of outcome. Aortic stiffness and increased wave reflections are independent predictors of cardiovascular events in renal transplant recipients. As single parameter of wave reflection, central augmentation pressure was better than central augmentation index. Combined measurement of pulse wave velocity and central augmentation pressure may contribute to an accurate cardiovascular risk estimation in this heterogeneous population.

摘要

虽然肾移植可以提高存活率,但与非肾脏人群相比,心血管发病率和死亡率仍然显著升高。然而,在这个过程中,传统的、与尿毒症相关的和与移植相关的风险因素的负面影响在很大程度上仍未得到探索。替代标志物,如主动脉僵硬和中心波反射,可能导致更准确的心血管风险分层,但在肾移植受者中的结果数据却很少。我们旨在确定这些标志物对肾移植受者致命和非致命心血管事件的预后意义。使用 SphygmoCor 系统测量了 512 例肾移植受者的颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度、中心增强压和中心增强指数。平均随访 5 年后,记录了 20 例致命和 75 例非致命心血管事件。使用受试者工作特征曲线,脉搏波速度预测心血管事件的曲线下面积为 0.718(95%CI 0.659-0.776),中心增强压为 0.670(95%CI 0.604-0.736),中心增强指数为 0.595(95%CI 0.529-0.660)。当我们在 Cox 回归分析中考虑年龄、性别和 C 反应蛋白时,脉搏波速度(风险比:每增加 1 SD 增加 1.349;95%CI 1.104-1.649;P=0.003)和中心增强压(风险比:每增加 1 SD 增加 1.487;95%CI 1.219-1.814;P<0.001)仍然是独立的预后预测因素。主动脉僵硬和波反射增加是肾移植受者心血管事件的独立预测因素。作为波反射的单一参数,中心增强压优于中心增强指数。脉搏波速度和中心增强压的联合测量可能有助于对这个异质人群进行准确的心血管风险评估。

相似文献

1
Aortic stiffness and central wave reflections predict outcome in renal transplant recipients.主动脉僵硬度和中心波反射可预测肾移植受者的预后。
Hypertension. 2011 Nov;58(5):833-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176594. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
2
Aortic calcifications and arterial stiffness as predictors of cardiovascular events in incident renal transplant recipients.主动脉钙化和动脉僵硬度可预测首发肾移植受者的心血管事件。
Transpl Int. 2013 Oct;26(10):973-81. doi: 10.1111/tri.12151. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
3
[Significance of arterial stiffness parameters for predicting cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients: a prospective cohort study].[动脉僵硬度参数对预测血液透析患者心血管死亡率的意义:一项前瞻性队列研究]
Orv Hetil. 2010 May 2;151(18):741-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2010.28861.
4
Ambulatory recording of wave reflections and arterial stiffness during intra- and interdialytic periods in patients treated with dialysis.透析治疗患者透析期间及透析间期动脉反射波和动脉僵硬度的动态记录
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):630-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08180814. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Cardiovascular and renal outcome in recipients of kidney grafts from living donors: role of aortic stiffness.活体供肾受者的心血管和肾脏结局:主动脉僵硬的作用。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 May;27(5):2095-100. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr578. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
6
Ambulatory Pulse Wave Velocity Is a Stronger Predictor of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Than Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis Patients.血液透析患者的动态脉波速度比诊室血压和动态血压更能准确预测心血管事件和全因死亡率。
Hypertension. 2017 Jul;70(1):148-157. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09023. Epub 2017 May 8.
7
Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch and mortality in dialysis population.透析人群中主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配与死亡率。
Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):378-84. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04587. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
8
Large artery stiffening and remodeling are independently associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease.大动脉僵硬度和重塑与慢性肾脏病的全因死亡率和心血管事件独立相关。
Hypertension. 2012 Dec;60(6):1451-7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.197210. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
High aortic augmentation index predicts mortality and cardiovascular events in men from a general population, but not in women.高主动脉增强指数可预测一般人群中男性的死亡率和心血管事件,但不能预测女性。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):1005-12. doi: 10.1177/2047487312449588. Epub 2012 May 30.
10
Differential impact of belatacept and cyclosporine A on central aortic blood pressure and arterial stiffness after renal transplantation.肾移植后贝拉西普和环孢素A对中心主动脉血压和动脉僵硬度的不同影响。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Sep;28(9):1004-9. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12413. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
CENtral blood pressure Targeting: a pragmatic RAndomized triaL in advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (CENTRAL-CKD): A Clinical Research Protocol.中心血压靶向治疗:晚期慢性肾脏病的一项实用随机试验(CENTRAL-CKD):一项临床研究方案
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 May 6;10:20543581231172407. doi: 10.1177/20543581231172407. eCollection 2023.
2
Non-Traditional Non-Immunological Risk Factors for Kidney Allograft Loss-Opinion.肾移植丢失的非传统非免疫风险因素——观点
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 18;12(6):2364. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062364.
3
Risk for subsequent hypertension and cardiovascular disease after living kidney donation: is it clinically relevant?
活体肾捐献后发生后续高血压和心血管疾病的风险:在临床上是否相关?
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Dec 13;15(4):644-656. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab271. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Influence of Belatacept- vs. CNI-Based Immunosuppression on Vascular Stiffness and Body Composition.基于贝拉西普与基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的免疫抑制对血管硬度和身体成分的影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 24;11(5):1219. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051219.
5
Less arterial stiffness in kidney transplant recipients than chronic kidney disease patients matched for renal function.肾移植受者的动脉僵硬度低于肾功能匹配的慢性肾病患者。
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Sep 3;14(4):1244-1254. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa120. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Exercise intolerance in kidney diseases: physiological contributors and therapeutic strategies.肾脏疾病中的运动不耐受:生理因素与治疗策略
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2021 Feb 1;320(2):F161-F173. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00437.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
7
Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Hypomagnesaemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients.肾移植受者中的质子泵抑制剂与低镁血症
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 6;8(12):2162. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122162.
8
Influence of Renal Transplantation and Living Kidney Donation on Large Artery Stiffness and Peripheral Vascular Resistance.肾移植和活体供肾对大动脉僵硬度和外周血管阻力的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 2020 Mar 13;33(3):234-242. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz175.
9
Aortic stiffness is independently associated with interstitial myocardial fibrosis by native T1 and accelerated in the presence of chronic kidney disease.主动脉僵硬度与心肌间质纤维化通过固有T1独立相关,且在慢性肾脏病存在时会加速进展。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019 Jun 26;24:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100389. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Arterial stiffness in black African ancestry patients with chronic kidney disease living in Cameroon.生活在喀麦隆的患有慢性肾病的非洲裔黑人患者的动脉僵硬度。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Aug;8(4):450-459. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.04.04.