El Hadj Othmane Taha, Kiss István, Nemcsik János, Fekete Cs Bertalan, Deák György, Egresits József, Fodor Erzsébet, Németh K Zsófia, Szabó Tamás, Szathmári Miklós, Tislér András
Semmelweis Egyetem, Altalános Orvostudományi Kar I. Belgyógyászati Klinika Budapest.
Orv Hetil. 2010 May 2;151(18):741-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2010.28861.
Previous studies demonstrated that different parameters of arterial stiffness are related to cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. The relative prognostic value of these parameters has not previously been evaluated in one cohort.
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, carotid augmentation index, carotid pulse pressure and carotid-brachial pulse pressure amplification were measured in 98 patients before and after hemodialysis. Patients were followed for a median of 29 months (1-34) and the association of these parameters with cardiovascular mortality was assessed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regressions.
During follow-up, 40 patients died (mortality rate 20.7/100 patient-year), of which 25 died of cardiovascular causes. Increasing pre- and postdialysis pulse wave velocity tertiles and decreasing predialysis pulse pressure amplification tertiles were significantly related to cardiovascular mortality (p-values are 0.012 and 0.011 for pre- and postdialysis pulse wave velocity, and <0.001 and 0,321 for pre- and postdialysis pulse pressure amplification, respectively). Neither the carotid augmentation index nor carotid pulse pressure was related to cardiovascular mortality. In the Cox-regression, the adjusted hazard ratios for 1 m/s higher pre- and postdialysis pulse wave velocity were 1.24 (1.07-1.44) and 1.17 (1.06-1.28), respectively. The hazard ratio for 10% lower predialysis pulse pressure amplification was 1.41 (1.03-1.92). When included in the same model, both predialysis pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure amplification remained significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality (relative risk: 1.23 [1.07-1.42] and 1.39 [1.02-1.89]).
Among different stiffness parameters, pulse wave velocity is consistently related to cardiovascular mortality, irrespective of the timing of measurement. Predialysis pulse pressure amplification seems to provide additional prognostic information.
先前的研究表明,动脉僵硬度的不同参数与血液透析患者的心血管死亡率相关。这些参数的相对预后价值此前尚未在同一队列中进行评估。
对98例患者在血液透析前后测量了颈股脉搏波速度、颈动脉增强指数、颈动脉脉压和颈臂脉压放大率。对患者进行了为期29个月(1 - 34个月)的中位随访,并使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险回归评估这些参数与心血管死亡率的关联。
在随访期间,40例患者死亡(死亡率为20.7/100患者年),其中25例死于心血管原因。透析前和透析后脉搏波速度三分位数的增加以及透析前脉压放大率三分位数的降低与心血管死亡率显著相关(透析前和透析后脉搏波速度的p值分别为0.012和0.011,透析前和透析后脉压放大率分别为<0.001和0.321)。颈动脉增强指数和颈动脉脉压均与心血管死亡率无关。在Cox回归中,透析前和透析后脉搏波速度每增加1 m/s的调整后风险比分别为1.24(1.07 - 1.44)和1.17(1.06 - 1.28)。透析前脉压放大率降低10%的风险比为1.41(1.03 - 1.92)。当纳入同一模型时,透析前脉搏波速度和脉压放大率均与心血管死亡率显著相关(相对风险:1.23 [1.07 - 1.42]和1.39 [1.02 - 1.89])。
在不同的僵硬度参数中,脉搏波速度始终与心血管死亡率相关,与测量时间无关。透析前脉压放大率似乎提供了额外的预后信息。