透析人群中主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配与死亡率。

Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch and mortality in dialysis population.

机构信息

From the CHU de Québec Research Center, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital, Québec, Québec, Canada (C.F., F.M., S.D., K.M., S.A.D.S., M.L., M.A.); Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada (C.F., F.M., S.D., K.M., S.A.D.S., M.L., M.A.); Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (P.B.); Department of Pharmacology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (P.B.); and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U970-PARCC, France (P.B.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):378-84. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04587. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

Abstract

We hypothesized that increased aortic stiffness (central elastic artery) combined with a decrease in brachial stiffness (peripheral muscular artery) leads to the reversal of the physiological stiffness gradient (ie, mismatch), promoting end-organ damages through increased forward pressure wave transmission into the microcirculation. We, therefore, examined the effect of aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch on mortality in patients in need of dialysis. In a prospective observational study, aortic-brachial arterial stiffness mismatch (pulse wave velocity ratio) was assessed using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity divided by carotid-radial pulse wave velocity in 310 adult patients on dialysis. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 146 (47%) deaths occurred. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality related to PWV ratio in a Cox regression analysis was 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.64; P<0.001 per 1 SD) and was still significant after adjustments for confounding factors, such as age, dialysis vintage, sex, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, and weight (HR, 1.23; 95% CI: 1.02-1.49). The HRs for changes in 1 SD of augmentation index (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12-1.63), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11-1.50), and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.95) were statistically significant in univariate analysis, but were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for age. In conclusion, aortic-brachial arterial stiffness mismatch was strongly and independently associated with increased mortality in this dialysis population. Further studies are required to confirm these finding in lower-risk groups.

摘要

我们假设,主动脉僵硬度(中央弹性动脉)增加,同时肱动脉僵硬度(外周肌性动脉)降低,导致生理僵硬度梯度发生逆转(即不匹配),通过增加正向压力波向微循环的传递,促进终末器官损伤。因此,我们研究了主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配对需要透析的患者死亡率的影响。在一项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们使用颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度除以颈动脉-桡动脉脉搏波速度来评估 310 名透析患者的主动脉-肱动脉动脉僵硬度不匹配(脉搏波速度比)。在中位数为 29 个月的随访后,发生了 146 例(47%)死亡。在 Cox 回归分析中,脉搏波速度比与死亡率相关的风险比(HR)为 1.43(95%置信区间[CI],1.24-1.64;每 1 个标准差增加 P<0.001),并且在调整年龄、透析年限、性别、心血管疾病、糖尿病、吸烟状态和体重等混杂因素后仍然显著(HR,1.23;95% CI:1.02-1.49)。变化 1 个标准差的增强指数(HR,1.35;95% CI,1.12-1.63)、颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(HR,1.29;95% CI,1.11-1.50)和颈动脉-桡动脉脉搏波速度(HR,0.80;95% CI,0.67-0.95)的 HR 在单变量分析中具有统计学意义,但在调整年龄后不再具有统计学意义。总之,在该透析人群中,主动脉-肱动脉动脉僵硬度不匹配与死亡率增加密切相关且独立相关。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现是否适用于风险较低的人群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索