Suppr超能文献

超声引导臂丛神经阻滞麻醉与镇痛用于上肢手术:当前理解要点,2011 年。

Ultrasound brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for upper extremity surgery: essentials of our current understanding, 2011.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):581-91. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834aca03.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ultrasound-guidance is gaining tremendous popularity. There is growing evidence of value with emphasis on clinical relevance, but can ultrasound-guidance scientifically warrant changing the practice of upper extremity regional? The literature is searched to describe findings where ultrasound may reduce complication rates, reduce block performance times, and improve block efficacy and quality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ultrasound examination identified variations in anatomical positioning of C5-C7 roots in approximately half of all patients despite no deleterious effects on block efficacy. Anesthetic volumes in brachial plexus blockade may be reduced without compromise of effectiveness. However, even with reduced volumes injected into the interscalene space, respiratory compromise from effect(s) on the phrenic nerve may result in hemi-diaphragmatic paresis. Ultrasound-guidance may reduce discomfort during axillary block placement compared with neurostimulation or parasthesia. Nerve catheters may be highly effective and provide prolonged analgesia compared with single-shot injections. Infraclavicular catheters result in improved analgesia compared with supraclavicular catheters and multiple injections of local provide no advantage over single-shot infraclavicular blockade. Dexamethasone combined with local may extend analgesia following a single-injection interscalene or supraclavicular block. During interscalene blockade, intraepineurial injections may occur, but incidence of nerve injury remains low. Therefore, debate continues about intraepineurial injections.

SUMMARY

Intraepineurial injection requires additional investigation. Conclusions have suggested reducing typical volumes (40  ml) of local with ultrasound-directed upper extremity blockade. Increased use of perineural catheters is being advocated for prolonged analgesia, but risk-to-benefit consequences need to always be considered.

摘要

目的综述

超声引导技术日益普及。越来越多的证据表明其具有临床相关性价值,但超声引导是否能从科学上证明改变上肢局部区域的治疗实践是合理的?本文通过检索文献来描述超声在降低并发症发生率、缩短阻滞操作时间、提高阻滞效果和质量方面的作用。

最新发现

尽管超声检查并未发现对阻滞效果有不利影响,但仍有约一半的患者 C5-C7 神经根的解剖位置存在变异。臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉容量可减少而不影响效果。然而,即使向锁骨上间隙内注射的容量减少,膈神经的作用仍可能导致膈肌部分麻痹,从而导致呼吸功能受损。与神经刺激或感觉异常相比,超声引导下腋路阻滞可减少患者的不适感。神经导管可能比单次注射更有效,提供更长时间的镇痛。与锁骨上导管相比,锁骨下导管可提供更好的镇痛效果,且多次局部注射并不优于单次锁骨下阻滞。地塞米松联合局部用药可延长单次肌间沟或锁骨上阻滞的镇痛作用。在肌间沟阻滞时,可能会发生神经内注射,但神经损伤的发生率仍然较低。因此,关于神经内注射仍存在争议。

总结

神经内注射需要进一步研究。结论表明,超声引导下的上肢神经阻滞可减少典型的局部麻醉药(40ml)用量。目前提倡使用神经周围导管来延长镇痛时间,但需要始终考虑风险与效益的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验