• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管切除术的疗效:食管癌患者术后并发症和中期肿瘤学结果的比较。

Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1883-y. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1883-y
PMID:21898014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During esophagectomy, laparoscopy can be used together with thoracoscopy, but it is not known whether a combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic procedure is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open esophagectomy, and without compromising oncological outcome.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study that included 185 esophageal cancer patients, including 72 who underwent combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE), 34 who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE), and 79 who underwent open esophagectomy (OE) between January 2002 and May 2010. The main outcome measures were postoperative respiratory and overall complications. The secondary outcome was 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Respiratory complications occurred in 9 patients who underwent TLE, 13 who underwent TE, and 31 who underwent OE. TLE was associated with fewer respiratory complications (TLE vs. OE: odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.53 and TE vs. OE: OR, 0.71; 95% CI 0.29-1.76). Overall complications occurred in 34 patients who underwent TLE, 20 who underwent TE, and 54 who underwent OE. TLE was associated with fewer overall complications (TLE vs. OE: OR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.94 and TE vs. OE: OR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.21-1.25). The 2-year RFS rates were similar among the three groups: 71.6% for TLE, 57.7% for TE, and 58.3% for OE (TLE vs. OE: hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI 0.35-1.20 and TE vs. OE: hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI 0.45-1.82).

CONCLUSION

Unlike TE, TLE was associated with fewer postoperative complications than was OE, with no compromise of 2-year RFS. A randomized controlled trial with longer follow-up is needed.

摘要

背景

在食管癌手术中,腹腔镜可与胸腔镜联合使用,但尚不清楚胸腔镜联合腹腔镜手术是否比开放食管癌手术术后并发症更少,同时不影响肿瘤学结果。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 185 例食管癌患者,其中 72 例行胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术(TLE),34 例行胸腔镜食管癌切除术(TE),79 例行开放食管癌切除术(OE),时间为 2002 年 1 月至 2010 年 5 月。主要观察指标为术后呼吸系统并发症和总体并发症。次要观察指标为 2 年无复发生存率(RFS)。

结果

TLE 组 9 例、TE 组 13 例和 OE 组 31 例患者发生呼吸系统并发症。TLE 组呼吸系统并发症发生率较低(TLE 与 OE:比值比 [OR],0.22;95%置信区间 [CI],0.09-0.53;TE 与 OE:OR,0.71;95%CI 0.29-1.76)。TLE 组 34 例、TE 组 20 例和 OE 组 54 例患者发生总体并发症。TLE 组总体并发症发生率较低(TLE 与 OE:OR,0.47;95%CI 0.23-0.94;TE 与 OE:OR,0.51;95%CI 0.21-1.25)。三组 2 年 RFS 率相似:TLE 组为 71.6%,TE 组为 57.7%,OE 组为 58.3%(TLE 与 OE:风险比,0.65;95%CI 0.35-1.20;TE 与 OE:风险比,0.91;95%CI 0.45-1.82)。

结论

与 TE 不同,TLE 术后并发症少于 OE,但 2 年 RFS 无差异。需要开展具有更长随访时间的随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管切除术的疗效:食管癌患者术后并发症和中期肿瘤学结果的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1883-y. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
2
Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.腹腔镜经裂孔翻转食管癌切除术的围手术期结果与胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术相比具有优势。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2147-54. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0249-6. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
3
Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy?胸腔镜-腹腔镜食管切除术是否优于胸腔镜食管切除术?
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
4
Laparoscopic assisted versus open gastric pull-up following thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A cohort study.胸腔镜食管切除术后腹腔镜辅助与开放胃牵引术的比较:一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.040. Epub 2015 May 15.
5
Optimized total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.优化的全胸腔镜与腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 9;14:73. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0824-6.
6
Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.比较胸腔镜联合腹腔镜与开胸 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术的围手术期结果。
Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):594-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.005.
7
Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?杂交微创食管切除术能否改善食管癌的治疗效果?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;42(8):1196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.027. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
8
Minimally Invasive Open Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer or Cancer of the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-term Survival Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.微创经左胸入路 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术或胃食管结合部癌切除术:采用倾向评分匹配分析比较术后结果和长期生存。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jul;41(7):3499-3510. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15137.
9
Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.胸腔镜下食管癌手术在俯卧位的低侵袭性:胸腔镜与开放食管癌手术手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1945-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5888-z. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
Long-term survival of patients with T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter trial.JCOG0502 前瞻性多中心试验:使用该数据行胸腔镜食管癌根治术的 T1bN0M0 食管癌患者的长期生存。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4275-4282. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08768-5. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Current advances and challenges in minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的当前进展与挑战
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02806-1.
2
Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence?术后并发症导致不良的肿瘤学结局:有何证据?
Curr Oncol. 2024 Aug 15;31(8):4632-4655. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31080346.
3
No difference in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications between abdominal laparoscopy and laparotomy for minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Japanese database.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.将腹腔镜手术纳入微创食管切除术是否有获益?对食管癌患者围手术期结果的影响。
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):790-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0955-4.
2
Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.手工缝合与吻合器吻合食管胃吻合术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 May;15(5):876-84. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1426-9. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
3
Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer.
微创胸腔镜食管切除术中,与开腹手术相比,腹部腹腔镜手术术后肺部并发症发生率无差异:一项使用全国性日本数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Esophagus. 2024 Jan;21(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01032-w. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
Comparison of erector spinae plane block with paravertebral block for thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较竖脊肌平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞用于胸腔镜手术的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 27;18(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02343-w.
5
Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study.在中国,两种不同的麻醉方法与恶性食管肿瘤根治性切除术后住院时间之间是否存在关系?一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01775-6.
6
Effect of dexmedetomidine supplementation for thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定辅助胸腔镜手术的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Apr 6;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01803-z.
7
A refined procedure for esophageal resection using a full minimally invasive approach.采用完全微创方法进行食管切除术的改良手术步骤。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Mar 4;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01765-2.
8
Advantages of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer: propensity score matching analysis of 169 cases.麦克伊文微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的优势:169 例倾向性评分匹配分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb 25;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02527-z.
9
Learning curve for minimally invasive oesophagectomy of oesophageal cancer and survival analysis.微创食管癌切除术的学习曲线和生存分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov 10;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01712-7.
10
Does thoracoscopic esophagectomy really reduce post-operative pneumonia in all cases?胸腔镜食管切除术真的能降低所有病例的术后肺炎发生率吗?
Esophagus. 2021 Oct;18(4):724-733. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00855-9. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
食管癌术后肺部并发症的相关因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1460-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1474-5. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
4
Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer.食管癌开放和微创切除方法的综述。
Br J Surg. 2010 Dec;97(12):1845-53. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7231. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
5
Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.经左侧喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫的微创左侧入路胸段食管癌切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):2965-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1072-4. Epub 2010 May 22.
6
Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.比较胸腔镜联合腹腔镜与开胸 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术的围手术期结果。
Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):594-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.005.
7
Recurrence after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: defining optimal follow-up intervals and testing.腺癌手术后复发:定义最佳随访间隔和检测。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.006.
8
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.微创与开放食管切除术的比较:结局的荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Nov;55(11):3031-40. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1153-1. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
9
Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.微创外科治疗食管癌是否有益?一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1621-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0822-7. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
10
Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌根治性切除及扩大淋巴结清扫术后的结肠代食管术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;88(5):1647-53. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.081.