Suppr超能文献

内镜下支架置入术与手术性胃空肠吻合术治疗恶性胃出口梗阻的比较。

Endoscopic stenting versus operative gastrojejunostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgical Unit, Nepean Hospital, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):323-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1870-3. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction represents a terminal stage in pancreatic cancer. Between 5% and 25% of patients with pancreatic cancer ultimately experience malignant gastric outlet obstruction. The aim in palliating patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction is to reestablish an oral intake by restoring gastrointestinal continuity. This ultimately improves their quality of life in the advanced stages of cancer. The main drawback to operative bypass is the high incidence of delayed gastric emptying, particularly in this group of patients with symptomatic obstruction. This study aimed to compare surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic stenting in palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction, acknowledging the diversity and heterogeneity of patients with this presentation.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated patients treated for malignant gastric outlet obstruction from December 1998 to November 2008 at Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Endoscopic duodenal stenting was performed under fluoroscopic guidance for placement of the stent. The operative patients underwent open surgical gastrojejunostomy. The outcomes assessed included time to diet, hospital length of stay (LOS), biliary drainage procedures, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 45 participants in this study, 26 underwent duodenal stenting and 19 had operative bypass. Comparing the stenting and operative patients, the median time to fluid intake was respectively 0 vs. 7 days (P < 0.001), and the time to intake of solids was 2 vs. 9 days (P = 0.004). The median total LOS was shorter in the stenting group (11 vs. 25 days; P < 0.001), as was the median postprocedure LOS (5 vs. 10 days; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic stenting is preferable to operative gastrojejunostomy in terms of shorter LOS, faster return to fluids and solids, and reduced morbidity and in-hospital mortality for patients with a limited life span.

摘要

背景

恶性胃出口梗阻是胰腺癌的终末期表现。5%至 25%的胰腺癌患者最终会出现恶性胃出口梗阻。姑息性治疗恶性胃出口梗阻的目的是通过恢复胃肠道连续性来重新建立口服摄入,从而提高晚期癌症患者的生活质量。手术旁路的主要缺点是胃排空延迟的发生率较高,尤其是在这组有症状性梗阻的患者中。本研究旨在比较手术胃空肠吻合术和内镜支架置入术在姑息性治疗恶性胃出口梗阻中的疗效,同时考虑到这组患者的多样性和异质性。

方法

本回顾性研究调查了 1998 年 12 月至 2008 年 11 月期间在澳大利亚悉尼 Nepean 医院接受恶性胃出口梗阻治疗的患者。内镜下经荧光透视引导放置支架进行十二指肠支架置入术。手术组患者行开腹胃空肠吻合术。评估的结果包括开始进食的时间、住院时间(LOS)、胆道引流术、发病率和死亡率。

结果

本研究共纳入 45 名参与者,其中 26 名患者接受了十二指肠支架置入术,19 名患者接受了手术旁路治疗。与支架置入术患者相比,置管术后开始摄入液体的中位时间分别为 0 天和 7 天(P < 0.001),开始摄入固体的中位时间分别为 2 天和 9 天(P = 0.004)。支架组的总 LOS 中位数更短(11 天与 25 天;P < 0.001),术后 LOS 中位数也更短(5 天与 10 天;P = 0.07)。

结论

对于预期寿命有限的患者,内镜支架置入术在 LOS 更短、更快恢复液体和固体摄入、降低发病率和住院死亡率方面优于手术胃空肠吻合术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验