• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建富有成效的参与:新兴技术的预参与工具。

Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies.

机构信息

Department of Science, Technology, and Policy Studies, School of Management and Governance, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):699-714. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9304-0. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-011-9304-0
PMID:21898147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3242942/
Abstract

Engagement with stakeholders and civil society is increasingly important for new scientific and technological developments. Preparation of such engagements sets the stage for engagement activities and thus contributes to their outcomes. Preparation is a demanding task, particularly if the facilitating agent aims for timely engagement related to emerging technologies. Requirements for such preparation include understanding of the emerging science & technology and its dynamics. Multi-level analysis and socio-technical scenarios are two complementary tools for constructing productive engagement. Examination of the emergence of nanotechnologies in the food packaging sector demonstrates how these tools work. In light of recent policy demands for responsible innovation, but also more generally, the role of organizers of engagement activities is one that deserves reflection insofar as it can extend beyond that of preparation and facilitation.

摘要

利益相关者和公民社会的参与对于新的科学和技术发展变得越来越重要。这种参与的准备为参与活动奠定了基础,从而为其结果做出了贡献。准备工作是一项艰巨的任务,特别是如果促进者旨在及时参与新兴技术的话。这种准备的要求包括对新兴科学技术及其动态的理解。多层次分析和社会技术情景是构建富有成效的参与的两种互补工具。食品包装行业中纳米技术的出现表明了这些工具是如何发挥作用的。鉴于最近对负责任创新的政策需求,以及更广泛地说,参与活动组织者的角色值得反思,因为它可以超越准备和促进的范畴。

相似文献

1
Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies.构建富有成效的参与:新兴技术的预参与工具。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):699-714. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9304-0. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
2
Engagement agents in the making: on the front lines of socio-technical integration : commentary on: "Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies".参与式制定:社会技术融合的前沿阵地:评论:“构建富有成效的参与:新兴技术的预参与工具”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):715-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9323-x. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
3
Art for public engagement on emerging and controversial technologies: A literature review.公众参与新兴和争议性技术的艺术:文献综述。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Aug;31(6):694-710. doi: 10.1177/09636625221093213. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: the case of 'public engagement in science'.技术科学、市场和社会界面上的流行语政治:以“公众参与科学”为例。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Apr;23(3):238-53. doi: 10.1177/0963662513515371. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
5
Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actors: Learning from Experiences Around Nanotechnology.在技术开发者与民间社会行为者之间建立探究机制:借鉴纳米技术相关经验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):907-22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9660-2. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.避免空洞的言辞:让公众参与关于纳米技术的辩论。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Mar;15(1):81-96. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9089-y. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
7
Reflecting on public engagement and science policy.反思公众参与和科学政策。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):27-31. doi: 10.1177/0963662513482614.
8
Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.生态效度与公众研究:有机公众参与方法的实例
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):77-91. doi: 10.1177/0963662513493575. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations.民主技术:实验与示范。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):649-66. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
10
Redesigning the architecture of policy-making: Engaging with Māori on nanotechnology in New Zealand.重新设计决策架构:新西兰就纳米技术与毛利人展开合作。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Apr;25(3):287-302. doi: 10.1177/0963662514548629. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and the Way Forward in Demand-Forecasting Practices within the Ethiopian Public Pharmaceutical Supply Chain.埃塞俄比亚公共药品供应链需求预测实践中的挑战与未来方向
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 May 31;12(3):86. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12030086.
2
"I am Primarily Paid for Publishing…": The Narrative Framing of Societal Responsibilities in Academic Life Science Research.“我主要是靠发表论文来获得报酬的……”:学术生命科学研究中社会责任的叙事框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1569-1593. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00191-8. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.负责任的研究与创新的定义和概念维度:文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
4
Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actors: Learning from Experiences Around Nanotechnology.在技术开发者与民间社会行为者之间建立探究机制:借鉴纳米技术相关经验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):907-22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9660-2. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
5
Engineers and Active Responsibility.工程师与积极责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):925-39. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Anticipatory ethics for a future Internet: analyzing values during the design of an Internet infrastructure.面向未来互联网的前瞻性伦理:在互联网基础设施设计过程中分析价值观
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9510-z. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?社论综述:公共科技学者:与谁互动?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):607-20. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9331-x. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Adding to the mix: integrating ELSI into a National Nanoscale Science and Technology Center.增添要素:将 ELSI 融入国家纳米科学技术中心。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):743-60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9311-1. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
2
Questioning 'participation': a critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a Flemish participatory technology assessment.质疑“参与”:对佛兰德参与式技术评估中其概念化的批判性评价。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):673-90. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9313-z. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
3
A timely harvest.
Nature. 2007 Nov 8;450(7167):174. doi: 10.1038/450174a.
4
Improving packaged food quality and safety. Part 2: nanocomposites.提高包装食品的质量与安全。第2部分:纳米复合材料。
Food Addit Contam. 2005 Oct;22(10):994-8. doi: 10.1080/02652030500239656.