Society-Technology Interactions Group Leader, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008 MS 6038, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):743-60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9311-1. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
This paper describes issues associated with integrating the study of Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) into ongoing scientific and technical research and describes an approach adopted by the authors for their own work with the center for nanophase materials sciences (CNMS) at the Oak Ridge national laboratory (ORNL). Four key questions are considered: (a) What is ELSI and how should it identify and address topics of interest for the CNMS? (b) What advantages accrue to incorporating ELSI into the CNMS? (c) How should the integration of ELSI into the CNMS take place? (d) How should one judge the effectiveness of the activity? We conclude that ELSI research is not a monolithic body of knowledge, but should be adapted to the question at hand. Our approach focuses on junctures in the R&D continuum at which key decisions occur, avoids topics of a purely ethical nature or advocacy, and seeks to gather data in ways that permit testing the validity of generalization. Integrating ELSI into the CNMS allows dealing with topics firmly grounded in science, offers concrete examples of potential downstream applications and provides access to the scientists using the CNMS and their insights and observations. As well, integration provides the opportunity for R&D managers to benefit from ELSI insights and the potential to modify R&D agendas. Successful integration is dependent on the particular ELSI question set that drives the project. In this case questions sought to identify key choices, information of value to scientists, institutional attributes, key attributes of the CNMS culture, and alternatives for communicating results. The opportunity to consult with scientists on ELSI implications is offered, but not promoted. Finally, ELSI effectiveness is judged by observing the use to which research products are put within the CNMS, ORNL, and the community of external scholars.
本文探讨了将伦理、法律和社会问题(ELSI)研究纳入正在进行的科学和技术研究的相关问题,并描述了作者在橡树岭国家实验室(ORNL)纳米相材料科学中心(CNMS)工作中采用的方法。文中考虑了四个关键问题:(a)ELSI 是什么,以及它应该如何确定和解决 CNMS 感兴趣的主题?(b)将 ELSI 纳入 CNMS 有何优势?(c)应如何将 ELSI 纳入 CNMS?(d)如何判断该活动的有效性?我们的结论是,ELSI 研究不是一个单一的知识体系,而应根据手头的问题进行调整。我们的方法侧重于研发连续体中发生关键决策的关节点,避免纯粹出于伦理或倡导性质的主题,并寻求以允许测试概括有效性的方式收集数据。将 ELSI 纳入 CNMS 可以处理科学基础扎实的主题,提供潜在下游应用的具体示例,并使研究人员能够接触使用 CNMS 的科学家及其见解和观察。此外,整合为研发经理提供了从 ELSI 见解中受益和修改研发议程的机会。成功的整合取决于驱动项目的特定 ELSI 问题集。在这种情况下,问题旨在确定关键选择、对科学家有价值的信息、机构属性、CNMS 文化的关键属性以及交流结果的替代方案。有机会就 ELSI 影响咨询科学家,但不提倡。最后,通过观察研究产品在 CNMS、ORNL 和外部学者社区中的使用情况来判断 ELSI 的有效性。