• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录、临床决策支持和血压控制。

Electronic health records, clinical decision support, and blood pressure control.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2011 Sep;17(9):626-32.

PMID:21902448
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Adding clinical decision support (CDS) to electronic health records (EHRs) is required under meaningful use legislation, but there has been little national data on effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes. We sought to determine whether EHRs with CDS improved blood pressure control in US primary care visits.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey.

METHODS

We examined adult visits to primary care physicians using the 2007 and 2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).

RESULTS

We found that patients had a mean age of 52 years, 34% were male, 15% had diabetes, and 70% were white. Rates of blood pressure control were significantly higher in visits where both an EHR and CDS (79%) were used, compared with visits where physicians used neither tool (74%; P = .004). Blood pressure control rates remained higher after adjusting for potential confounders. In unadjusted analyses, mean systolic blood pressure was 2 mm Hg lower in visits with the use of both an EHR and CDS, compared with visits where physicians used neither tool (P = .03), and this difference remained significant after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The NAMCS shows that physician use of an EHR with CDS is associated with improved blood pressure control. These findings are important because small improvements in blood pressure control are associated with reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

摘要

目的

根据有意义的使用法规,需要在电子健康记录 (EHR) 中添加临床决策支持 (CDS),但关于改善临床结果的有效性,全国范围内的数据很少。我们试图确定 EHR 与 CDS 是否可以改善美国初级保健就诊中的血压控制。

研究设计

我们使用了横断面、全国代表性调查。

方法

我们使用 2007 年和 2008 年国家门诊医疗调查 (NAMCS) 检查了初级保健医生的成人就诊情况。

结果

我们发现,患者的平均年龄为 52 岁,34%为男性,15%患有糖尿病,70%为白人。在同时使用 EHR 和 CDS 的就诊中(79%),血压控制率明显高于既不使用 EHR 也不使用 CDS 的就诊中(74%;P =.004)。调整潜在混杂因素后,血压控制率仍然较高。在未调整分析中,与既不使用 EHR 也不使用 CDS 的就诊相比,同时使用 EHR 和 CDS 的就诊中平均收缩压降低了 2mmHg(P =.03),调整后这一差异仍然显著。

结论

NAMCS 表明,医生使用带 CDS 的 EHR 与改善血压控制相关。这些发现很重要,因为血压控制的微小改善与心血管发病率和死亡率的降低相关。

相似文献

1
Electronic health records, clinical decision support, and blood pressure control.电子健康记录、临床决策支持和血压控制。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Sep;17(9):626-32.
2
Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.电子健康记录与临床决策支持系统:对国家门诊医疗质量的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 23;171(10):897-903. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
3
Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care.使用电子健康记录临床决策支持与改善医疗质量相关。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Oct 1;20(10):e445-52.
4
Hypertension control at physicians' offices in the United States.美国医生办公室的高血压控制情况。
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Feb;21(2):136-42. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2007.35. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
5
Psoriasis and cardiovascular screening rates in the United States.美国的银屑病与心血管疾病筛查率
J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Jan;12(1):e14-9.
6
Electronic health record components and the quality of care.电子健康记录组件与医疗质量。
Med Care. 2008 Dec;46(12):1267-72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e18ae.
7
National estimates of the impact of electronic health records on the workload of primary care physicians.电子健康记录对基层医疗医生工作量影响的全国性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 10;16:172. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1422-6.
8
The comparative effectiveness of 2 electronic prescribing systems.两种电子处方系统的比较效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP88-94.
9
Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States.美国电子健康记录的使用与门诊医疗质量
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 9;167(13):1400-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1400.
10
Technology-driven intervention to improve hypertension outcomes in community health centers.技术驱动的干预措施,以改善社区卫生中心的高血压治疗效果。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP103-10.

引用本文的文献

1
"Paediatricians brace thyself" - Healthcare provider perspectives on childhood and adolescent hypertension: A qualitative study.“儿科医生做好准备”——医疗服务提供者对儿童及青少年高血压的看法:一项定性研究
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Dec;12(12):3209-3216. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_353_23. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
Refining Clinical Phenotypes to Improve Clinical Decision Support and Reduce Alert Fatigue: A Feasibility Study.精炼临床表型以改善临床决策支持和减少警报疲劳:一项可行性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):528-537. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768994. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Categorization of Third-Party Apps in Electronic Health Record App Marketplaces: Systematic Search and Analysis.
电子健康记录应用程序市场中第三方应用程序的分类:系统检索与分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 29;8(5):e16980. doi: 10.2196/16980.
4
Predicting Optimal Hypertension Treatment Pathways Using Recurrent Neural Networks.使用循环神经网络预测最佳高血压治疗途径。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104122. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
5
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化决策支持系统对心血管风险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.
6
Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.耐药性高血压:检测、评估与管理:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Hypertension. 2018 Nov;72(5):e53-e90. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084.
7
Updated Guideline May Improve the Recognition and Diagnosis of Hypertension in Children and Adolescents; Review of the 2017 AAP Blood Pressure Clinical Practice Guideline.更新后的指南可能改善儿童和青少年高血压的识别与诊断;2017年美国儿科学会血压临床实践指南述评
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017 Oct 16;19(10):84. doi: 10.1007/s11906-017-0780-8.
8
Pediatric Hypertension: Provider Perspectives.小儿高血压:医疗服务提供者的观点
Glob Pediatr Health. 2017 Jun 6;4:2333794X17712637. doi: 10.1177/2333794X17712637. eCollection 2017.
9
Research on Clinical Preventive Services for Adolescents and Young Adults: Where Are We and Where Do We Need to Go?青少年和青年成人临床预防服务研究:我们所处的位置及前进方向?
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Mar;60(3):249-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.早期慢性肾脏病的肾脏病共同管理与初级保健单独管理:一项回顾性横断面分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Oct 12;16:162. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x.