• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用循环神经网络预测最佳高血压治疗途径。

Predicting Optimal Hypertension Treatment Pathways Using Recurrent Neural Networks.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Ave., NW, First Floor, Washington DC, 20037, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104122. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104122
PMID:32339929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10490557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In ambulatory care settings, physicians largely rely on clinical guidelines and guideline-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems to make decisions on hypertension treatment. However, current clinical evidence, which is the knowledge base of clinical guidelines, is insufficient to support definitive optimal treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of using deep learning predictive models to identify optimal hypertension treatment pathways for individual patients, based on empirical data available from an electronic health record database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used data on 245,499 unique patients who were initially diagnosed with essential hypertension and received anti-hypertensive treatment from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2010 in ambulatory care settings. We used recurrent neural networks (RNN), including long short-term memory (LSTM) and bi-directional LSTM, to create risk-adapted models to predict the probability of reaching the BP control targets associated with different BP treatment regimens. The ratios for the training set, the validation set, and the test set were 6:2:2. The samples for each set were independently randomly drawn from individual years with corresponding proportions.

RESULTS

The LSTM models achieved high accuracy when predicting individual probability of reaching BP goals on different treatments: for systolic BP (<140 mmHg), diastolic BP (<90 mmHg), and both systolic BP and diastolic BP (<140/90 mmHg), F1-scores were 0.928, 0.960, and 0.913, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated the potential of using predictive models to select optimal hypertension treatment pathways. Along with clinical guidelines and guideline-based CDS systems, the LSTM models could be used as a powerful decision-support tool to form risk-adapted, personalized strategies for hypertension treatment plans, especially for difficult-to-treat patients.

摘要

背景

在门诊环境中,医生主要依靠临床指南和基于指南的临床决策支持(CDS)系统来决定高血压的治疗方案。然而,目前的临床证据(即临床指南的知识库)不足以支持明确的最佳治疗方案。

目的

本研究旨在测试使用深度学习预测模型根据电子健康记录数据库中可用的经验数据,为个体患者确定最佳高血压治疗途径的可行性。

材料和方法

本研究使用了 245499 名独特患者的数据,这些患者于 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日在门诊环境中被最初诊断为原发性高血压并接受抗高血压治疗。我们使用了包括长短期记忆(LSTM)和双向 LSTM 在内的递归神经网络(RNN)来创建风险适应模型,以预测不同降压治疗方案相关的血压控制目标的达成概率。训练集、验证集和测试集的比例为 6:2:2。每个集的样本都是从各年独立随机抽取的,比例相同。

结果

LSTM 模型在预测不同治疗方案下个体达到血压目标的概率时具有很高的准确性:对于收缩压(<140mmHg)、舒张压(<90mmHg)和收缩压与舒张压(<140/90mmHg),F1 评分分别为 0.928、0.960 和 0.913。

结论

结果表明,使用预测模型选择最佳高血压治疗途径具有潜力。LSTM 模型与临床指南和基于指南的 CDS 系统一起,可以作为一种强大的决策支持工具,为高血压治疗计划制定风险适应的个性化策略,特别是对于难治性患者。

相似文献

1
Predicting Optimal Hypertension Treatment Pathways Using Recurrent Neural Networks.使用循环神经网络预测最佳高血压治疗途径。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104122. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
2
Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?高血压的治疗:针对不同患者应设定何种目标?
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:117-127. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_97.
3
Blood Pressure Targets Achievement According to 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines in Three European Excellence Centers for Hypertension.根据2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会指南,三个欧洲卓越高血压中心的血压目标达成情况
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Feb;27(1):51-59. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00359-0. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Reclassification of Hypertensive Outpatients According to New US Guidelines on High Blood Pressure.根据新的美国高血压指南重新分类高血压门诊患者。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Jan 1;32(1):77-87. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy139.
5
Blood pressure monitoring technique impacts hypertension treatment.血压监测技术影响高血压治疗。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):623-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1937-9. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
6
Blood Pressure Target Achievement Under Monotheraphy: A Real-Life Appraisal.单药治疗下的血压目标达成:一项真实世界评估
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Dec;27(6):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00420-y. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting individual responses to antihypertensive treatments.基于机器学习的预测个体对降压治疗反应的模型的开发。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jul;34(7):1660-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2024.02.014. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Long-term efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil in Chinese hypertensive patients as assessed by clinic, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements.奥美沙坦酯治疗中国高血压患者的长期疗效评估:诊室血压、动态血压和家庭血压测量结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Nov;32(11):729-34. doi: 10.1007/s40261-012-0003-7.
9
Blood pressure control in treated hypertensive Middle Eastern patients: a post hoc analysis based on JNC8 definitions.接受治疗的中东高血压患者的血压控制:基于美国国立综合癌症网络(JNC8)定义的事后分析
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019 Mar 6;15:35-46. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S188981. eCollection 2019.
10
Reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment (RIAT): a primary care antihypertensive intervention study.不强化抗高血压治疗的原因(RIAT):一项基层医疗抗高血压干预研究。
J Hypertens. 2004 Jun;22(6):1221-9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200406000-00024.

引用本文的文献

1
Generative AI Models in Time-Varying Biomedical Data: Scoping Review.时变生物医学数据中的生成式人工智能模型:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e59792. doi: 10.2196/59792.
2
Trends and Gaps in Digital Precision Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.数字精准高血压管理的趋势与差距:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 10;27:e59841. doi: 10.2196/59841.
3
Accounting for racial bias and social determinants of health in a model of hypertension control.在高血压控制模型中考虑种族偏见和健康的社会决定因素。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02873-4.
4
A machine learning framework for interpretable predictions in patient pathways: The case of predicting ICU admission for patients with symptoms of sepsis.用于患者路径中可解释预测的机器学习框架:以预测脓毒症症状患者 ICU 入院为例。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Jun;27(2):136-167. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09673-8. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Personalized hypertension treatment recommendations by a data-driven model.基于数据驱动模型的个体化高血压治疗推荐。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Mar 1;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02137-z.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension Management: An Ace up Your Sleeve.高血压管理中的人工智能:你的秘密武器。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 9;10(2):74. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020074.
7
Learning dynamic treatment strategies for coronary heart diseases by artificial intelligence: real-world data-driven study.通过人工智能学习冠心病的动态治疗策略:基于真实世界数据的研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01774-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of blood pressure variability using deep neural networks.基于深度神经网络的血压变异性预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104067. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104067. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
2
Predicting post-stroke pneumonia using deep neural network approaches.使用深度神经网络方法预测卒中后肺炎。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Dec;132:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103986. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension.基于机器学习的高血压预测模型的可解释性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0874-0.
4
Adherence in Hypertension.高血压的依从性。
Circ Res. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):1124-1140. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313220.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
6
Exercise as a tool for hypertension and resistant hypertension management: current insights.运动作为高血压和顽固性高血压管理的工具:当前见解
Integr Blood Press Control. 2018 Sep 20;11:65-71. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S136028. eCollection 2018.
7
Opening the black box of neural networks: methods for interpreting neural network models in clinical applications.打开神经网络的黑匣子:临床应用中解释神经网络模型的方法。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jun;6(11):216. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.32.
8
Future Direction for Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Manage Hypertension.人工智能在预测和管理高血压方面的未来方向。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018 Jul 6;20(9):75. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0875-x.
9
Using machine learning on cardiorespiratory fitness data for predicting hypertension: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) Project.利用心肺适能数据进行机器学习预测高血压:亨利福特锻炼测试(FIT)项目。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195344. eCollection 2018.
10
Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer.基于深度学习的组织分析预测结直肠癌的预后。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 21;8(1):3395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3.