• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估两种市售预成乳磨牙不锈钢冠成功率的临床研究。

A clinical study evaluating success of 2 commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns.

作者信息

Leith Rona, O'Connell Anne C

机构信息

Department of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental School and Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):300-6.

PMID:21902995
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the success of posterior NuSmile(®) and Kinder™Krown and to determine the level of parental satisfaction with this treatment option.

METHODS

Forty-eight crowns were placed in 18 children with a mean age of 5 years. A split mouth design was used. Each participant randomly received each crown type on 2 or 4 pair matched molars. Two trained operators completed all treatments. Two additional trained and calibrated clinicians blindly re-evaluated crowns according to specified variables. A visual analogue scale was used to determine parental satisfaction. Examiner reliability was determined by Cohen's kappa scores and results were analysed statistically using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

All crowns were retained after 12 months with no statistical difference in the clinical and radiographic success of posterior NuSmile(®) and Kinder™Krowns. Overall success was high with 81% of facings intact and 83% free of gingival inflammation after 12 months. Radiographically, 81% were successful. Veneer facing wear was significantly more likely to occur with opposing crowns (P=.02). Parental satisfaction was excellent with a mean score of 9.3 out of 10.

CONCLUSIONS

These crowns combine the durability of conventional stainless steel crowns with improved esthetics and are proposed as a suitable alternative where esthetic demand is increased.

摘要

目的

评估后牙NuSmile(®)和Kinder™Krown牙冠的成功率,并确定家长对这种治疗方案的满意度。

方法

为18名平均年龄5岁的儿童放置了48颗牙冠。采用双侧对照设计。每位参与者在2或4对匹配的磨牙上随机接受每种类型的牙冠。两名经过培训的操作人员完成了所有治疗。另外两名经过培训和校准的临床医生根据指定变量对牙冠进行盲法重新评估。使用视觉模拟量表来确定家长的满意度。通过科恩kappa评分确定检查者的可靠性,并使用费舍尔精确检验对结果进行统计学分析。

结果

12个月后所有牙冠均得以保留,后牙NuSmile(®)和Kinder™Krown牙冠在临床和影像学成功率方面无统计学差异。总体成功率较高,12个月后81%的贴面完好,83%无牙龈炎症。影像学检查显示,81%成功。与对颌牙冠相比,贴面磨损的发生可能性显著更高(P = 0.02)。家长满意度极佳,平均评分为9.3分(满分10分)。

结论

这些牙冠结合了传统不锈钢牙冠的耐用性和改善的美观性,被提议作为美观需求增加时的合适替代方案。

相似文献

1
A clinical study evaluating success of 2 commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns.一项评估两种市售预成乳磨牙不锈钢冠成功率的临床研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):300-6.
2
A randomized clinical trial investigating the performance of two commercially available posterior pediatric preveneered stainless steel crowns: a continuation study.一项调查两种市售后牙儿童预成不锈钢冠性能的随机临床试验:一项延续性研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(7):494-8.
3
Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns.前牙预成不锈钢冠的临床成功率及家长满意度
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):391-5.
4
Posterior preveneered stainless steel crowns: clinical performance after three years.后牙预成不锈钢冠:三年后的临床性能
Pediatr Dent. 2014 May-Jun;36(3):254-8.
5
Clinical evaluation of two different methods of stainless steel esthetic crowns.两种不同方法制作不锈钢美学冠的临床评估
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Sep-Dec;71(3):212-4.
6
Clinical evaluation of and parental satisfaction with resin-faced stainless steel crowns.树脂贴面不锈钢冠的临床评估及家长满意度
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;23(1):28-31.
7
Long-term clinical performance of esthetic primary molar crowns.
Pediatr Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;25(6):582-4.
8
Veneer retention of preveneered primary stainless steel crowns after crimping.压接后预涂覆的初级不锈钢冠的贴面固位
J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 Jan-Apr;75(1):44-7.
9
Clinical outcomes for primary anterior teeth treated with preveneered stainless steel crowns.采用预成不锈钢冠治疗乳前牙的临床疗效。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):377-81.
10
Retention of esthetic veneers on primary stainless steel crowns.美学贴面在乳牙不锈钢冠上的保留情况。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1996 May-Jun;63(3):185-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Interleukin-6 Levels and Counts in Pediatric Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns: A Comparative Study.儿科不锈钢和氧化锆牙冠中白细胞介素-6水平及计数的评估:一项对比研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(4):395-403. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2813.
2
Effect of pre-fabricated strip, zirconia and stainless steel crowns in primary molars.预成带环、氧化锆冠和不锈钢冠对乳磨牙的影响。
Bioinformation. 2023 Dec 31;19(13):1388-1393. doi: 10.6026/973206300191388. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison between Restorative Materials for Pulpotomised Deciduous Molars: A Randomized Clinical Study.
乳牙牙髓切断术修复材料的比较:一项随机临床研究。
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;10(2):284. doi: 10.3390/children10020284.
4
Review on Preformed Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry-The Composition and Application.儿童牙科预成冠的综述——组成与应用
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;15(6):2081. doi: 10.3390/ma15062081.
5
Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars.不锈钢冠和氧化锆冠用于乳磨牙的临床成功率、家长及儿童满意度评估
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1418-1423. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements.不同黏固剂黏结的儿童甲冠与不锈钢冠微渗漏的比较
Front Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):31-36. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1106. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
7
Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.预制儿童氧化锆冠与预制儿童金属冠的比较:一项随机临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 24;20(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3559-1.
8
In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements.使用不同粘结水门汀对乳牙预成金属冠和美学冠之间微渗漏的体外比较
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):387-392. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
Twenty-nine-month follow-up of a paediatric zirconia dental crown.一颗儿童氧化锆牙冠的29个月随访
BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Jun 14;2017:bcr-2017-219891. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-219891.
10
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Stainless Steel Crowns Using Two Mechanical Surface Treatments and Two Bonding Systems.使用两种机械表面处理和两种粘结系统比较复合材料与不锈钢冠的剪切粘结强度。
J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Jan;13(1):60-7.