Huber P J, Thal E R
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Surg Clin North Am. 1990 Jun;70(3):561-73. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45130-3.
The evaluation and management of colon injuries have recently undergone significant changes. The time-honored philosophy of conservative management by repair and diversion is giving way to a more aggressive approach, which includes primary repair of many injuries. The role of colostomy has been challenged by the need for additional operative procedures, patient disability, and rising hospital and medical costs. Based on the current literature, the authors have come to the following conclusions: 1. Primary repair is safe in carefully selected cases. 2. Colostomy should not be abandoned because of a fear of the morbidity associated with its closure. 3. The difference between injuries on the right and the left is questionable and probably not as significant as previously thought. 4. Exteriorized repair frequently requires conversion to colostomy and probably has little indication for use. 5. Short-term perioperative single-antibiotic coverage is sufficient. 6. Use of drains cannot be supported in most instances. 7. Wounds are best left open in patients with significant contamination. Surgical judgment remains the final arbiter in the decision process. These controversies and the debate generated have sharpened the guidelines for that judgment.
结肠损伤的评估与处理近来发生了显著变化。长期以来通过修复和转流进行保守处理的理念正逐渐被一种更积极的方法所取代,这种方法包括对许多损伤进行一期修复。结肠造口术的作用受到了额外手术操作需求、患者残疾以及医院和医疗费用不断上升的挑战。基于当前文献,作者得出以下结论:1. 在精心挑选的病例中,一期修复是安全的。2. 不应因担心结肠造口关闭相关的并发症而放弃它。3. 左右侧损伤之间的差异存疑,可能不像之前认为的那么显著。4. 外置修复常常需要转为结肠造口术,可能几乎没有使用指征。5. 围手术期短期单一抗生素覆盖就足够了。6. 在大多数情况下不支持使用引流管。7. 对于污染严重的患者,伤口最好敞开。手术判断仍然是决策过程中的最终裁决者。这些争议以及引发的辩论使该判断的指导原则更加明确。