• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一期修复与结肠造口术治疗穿透性结肠损伤的比较

Primary repair vs. colostomy for the treatment of penetrating colon injuries.

作者信息

Ridgeway C A, Frame S B, Rice J C, Timberlake G A, McSwain N E, Kerstein M D

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Dec;32(12):1046-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02553879.

DOI:10.1007/BF02553879
PMID:2591279
Abstract

The charts of 81 consecutive patients with penetrating colonic trauma were reviewed. Sixty-five patients were considered for evaluation. Penetrating abdominal trauma index, associated injuries, length of operative procedure, wounding agent, length of hospital stay, method of treatment, and septic complications were evaluated. Twenty-eight patients were treated with colostomy at the site of injury: five with diverting colostomy proximal to repair, 30 with primary repair (either single or multiple injuries), and two with exteriorization and early drop back. Overall septic morbidity was 15 of 65 (23 percent) patients. No statistically significant difference was found in morbidity between colostomy, 9 of 33 (27 percent), and primary repair, 6 of 30 (20 percent). The two patients with exteriorized repairs had no morbidity. No deaths were reported among the 65 patients studied. Thirty-two of the 33 (97 percent) colostomies were later closed with morbidity in 7 of 32 (22 percent). The mean length of stay for primary repair patients was 10.3 +/- 2.8 days and for colostomy patients, 25.7 +/- 3.8 days, counting days for both initial and colostomy closure admissions (P less than .05). Colostomy was not mandated by anatomic location or number of colonic injuries, circumference of colonic wall involved, presence of fecal contamination, or involvement of mesenteric blood supply. This study indicates that primary repair does not carry an increased risk of septic complications and saves the patient the significant risk and increased hospital stay of colostomy closure. Prospective studies addressing this area are indicated.

摘要

回顾了81例连续性结肠穿透伤患者的病历。65例患者被纳入评估。对穿透性腹部创伤指数、合并伤、手术时间、致伤物、住院时间、治疗方法及感染并发症进行了评估。28例患者在损伤部位行结肠造口术:5例在修复近端行转流性结肠造口术,30例行一期修复(单处或多处损伤),2例行肠外置术及早期还纳。65例患者中总体感染发病率为15例(23%)。结肠造口术组33例中有9例(27%)发生感染,一期修复组30例中有6例(20%)发生感染,两组发病率差异无统计学意义。2例行肠外置修复术的患者未发生感染。65例研究患者中无死亡报告。33例结肠造口术中32例(97%)随后关闭,32例中有7例(22%)发生感染。一期修复患者的平均住院时间为10.3±2.8天,结肠造口术患者为25.7±3.8天,计算初次住院及结肠造口关闭住院的天数(P<0.05)。结肠造口术并非由结肠损伤的解剖位置、数量、肠壁受累周径、粪便污染情况或肠系膜血供受累情况决定。本研究表明,一期修复不会增加感染并发症的风险,且为患者避免了结肠造口关闭的重大风险及住院时间延长。建议针对该领域开展前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
Primary repair vs. colostomy for the treatment of penetrating colon injuries.一期修复与结肠造口术治疗穿透性结肠损伤的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Dec;32(12):1046-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02553879.
2
A ten-year study of penetrating injuries of the colon.一项关于结肠穿透伤的十年研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0726-5.
3
Primary repair of 58 consecutive penetrating injuries of the colon: should colostomy be abandoned?连续58例结肠穿透伤的一期修复:是否应摒弃结肠造口术?
Am Surg. 1997 Feb;63(2):170-7.
4
Identifying the low-risk patient with penetrating colonic injury for selective use of primary repair.识别穿透性结肠损伤的低风险患者以选择性地进行一期修复。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):237-42.
5
Civilian colon trauma: factors that predict success by primary repair.平民结肠创伤:预测一期修复成功的因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Jun;40(6):685-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02140898.
6
Penetrating injuries to the colon: analysis by anatomic region of injury.结肠穿透伤:按损伤解剖区域分析
South Med J. 1989 Sep;82(9):1099-102. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198909000-00010.
7
Penetrating right colon trauma. The ever diminishing role for colostomy.右半结肠穿透伤。结肠造口术的作用日益减小。
Am Surg. 1987 Apr;53(4):209-14.
8
Trauma of the colon: early drop-back of exteriorized repair.结肠创伤:外置修复的早期回纳
Arch Surg. 1982 May;117(5):652-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380290098017.
9
The high morbidity of colostomy closure after trauma: further support for the primary repair of colon injuries.创伤后结肠造口关闭的高发病率:对结肠损伤一期修复的进一步支持。
Surgery. 1998 Feb;123(2):157-64.
10
Further evaluation of colostomy in penetrating colon injury.穿透性结肠损伤中结肠造口术的进一步评估。
Am Surg. 2000 Apr;66(4):342-6; discussion 346-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Current management of colon trauma.结肠创伤的当前管理。
World J Surg. 2003 Jun;27(6):632-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6762-9. Epub 2003 May 2.