• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对决策制定(DM)有何看法?迈向以患者为中心的综合护理模式。使用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。

What perceptions do patients have of decision making (DM)? Toward an integrative patient-centered care model. A qualitative study using focus-group interviews.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.010
PMID:21903355
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand patients' perceptions of decision making and identify relationships among decision-making models.

METHODS

This qualitative study was made up of four focus group interviews (elderly persons, users of health support groups, students, and rural inhabitants). Participants were asked to report their perceptions of decision making in three written clinical scenarios (hypertension, breast cancer, prostate cancer). The analysis was based on the principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Most patients perceived decision making as shared decision making, a deliberative question-response interaction with the physician that allowed patients to be experts in obtaining clearer information, participating in the care process, and negotiating compromises with physician preferences. Requesting second opinions allowed patients to maintain control, even within the paternalistic model preferred by elderly persons. Facilitating factors (trust, qualitative non-verbal communication, time to think) and obstacles (serious/emergency situations, perceived inadequate scientific competence, problems making requests, fear of knowing) were also part of shared decision making.

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

In the global concept of patient-centered care, shared decision making can be flexible and can integrate paternalistic and informative models. Physicians' expertise should be associated with biomedical and relational skills through listening to, informing, and advising patients, and by supporting patients' choices.

摘要

目的

了解患者对决策的看法,并确定决策模型之间的关系。

方法

本定性研究由四个焦点小组访谈(老年人、健康支持小组使用者、学生和农村居民)组成。要求参与者根据三个书面临床情景(高血压、乳腺癌、前列腺癌)报告他们对决策的看法。分析基于扎根理论的原则。

结果

大多数患者认为决策是共同决策,这是一种深思熟虑的问答互动,使患者能够成为获取更清晰信息、参与护理过程以及与医生偏好协商妥协的专家。征求第二意见可以让患者即使在老年人喜欢的家长式模式下也能保持控制。促进因素(信任、定性非言语交流、思考时间)和障碍(严重/紧急情况、感知到的科学能力不足、提出请求的问题、害怕了解)也是共同决策的一部分。

结论和实践意义

在以患者为中心的护理的全球概念中,共同决策可以具有灵活性,可以整合家长式和信息式模式。医生的专业知识应通过倾听、告知和建议患者,并支持患者的选择,与生物医学和关系技能相结合。

相似文献

1
What perceptions do patients have of decision making (DM)? Toward an integrative patient-centered care model. A qualitative study using focus-group interviews.患者对决策制定(DM)有何看法?迈向以患者为中心的综合护理模式。使用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
2
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
3
The doctor and the patient--how is a clinical encounter perceived?医生与患者——临床相遇是如何被感知的?
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
4
Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的情况:老年癌症患者的偏好及其医生的认知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.
5
Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.相互冲突的规范:加拿大乡村家庭医生对临床实践指南和共同决策的看法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):79-84. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007052.
6
Shared decision making: prostate cancer patients' appraisal of treatment alternatives and oncologists' eliciting and responding behavior, an explorative study.共同决策:前列腺癌患者对治疗方案的评估及肿瘤医生的启发与回应行为,一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):e251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
7
Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.治疗相关信息及参与决策:一项关于类风湿关节炎患者认知与偏好的定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):775-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023705.
8
The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.共同决策干预对抑郁症初级护理的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 May 16.
9
Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.衡量会诊中的共同决策:OPTION 工具与知情决策工具的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
10
Perspectives of decision-making in requests for euthanasia: a qualitative research among patients, relatives and treating physicians in the Netherlands.关于安乐死请求中决策的观点:荷兰患者、亲属和治疗医生的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):27-37. doi: 10.1177/0269216312463259. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of sleep and sleep research among African American adults.非裔美国成年人对睡眠及睡眠研究的认知
Sleep Health. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2025.05.007.
2
Embodied conversational agents for shared decision-making: a scoping review protocol.用于共享决策的具身对话代理:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):e095360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095360.
3
Pain, No Gain?: A Narrative Analysis Exploring the Accounts of Older African American Patients and Their Discussion of Pain Management Related to Chronic Illness.
没有痛苦就没有收获?:一项叙事分析,探究老年非裔美国患者的叙述及其对与慢性病相关的疼痛管理的讨论。
Rhetor Health Med. 2023 Spring;6(2):217-240.
4
Communication Strategies of Transplant Hematologists in High-Risk Decision-Making Conversations.移植血液学家在高风险决策对话中的沟通策略。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Apr;20(4):538-548. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00574. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Analysis of factors that promote the participation of patients with chronic diseases in shared decision making on medication: a cross-sectional survey in Hubei Province, China.分析促进慢性病患者参与药物治疗共享决策的因素:中国湖北省的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2440. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17099-0.
6
Determining the Development Strategy and Suited Adoption Paths for the Core Competence of Shared Decision-Making Tasks through the SAA-NRM Approach.通过 SAA-NRM 方法确定共享决策任务核心能力的发展策略和适用采用路径。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 15;19(20):13310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013310.
7
Observable indicators of person-centred care: an interview study with patients, relatives and professionals.以患者为中心的护理的可观察指标:一项对患者、亲属和专业人员的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e059308. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059308.
8
Implementing a breast cancer patient decision aid: Process evaluation using medical files and the patients' perspective.实施乳腺癌患者决策辅助工具:使用医疗档案和患者视角进行的过程评估。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jul;30(4):e13387. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13387. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study.在共同决策过程的后半阶段引出偏好需要关注:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z.
10
Patient Assessment and Chronic Pain Self-Management in Ethnomedicine: Seasonal and Ecosystemic Embodiment in Ayurvedic Patient-Centered Care.民族医学中的患者评估和慢性疼痛自我管理:以患者为中心的阿育吠陀护理中的季节性和生态系统体现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082842.