Department of General Practice, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
To understand patients' perceptions of decision making and identify relationships among decision-making models.
This qualitative study was made up of four focus group interviews (elderly persons, users of health support groups, students, and rural inhabitants). Participants were asked to report their perceptions of decision making in three written clinical scenarios (hypertension, breast cancer, prostate cancer). The analysis was based on the principles of grounded theory.
Most patients perceived decision making as shared decision making, a deliberative question-response interaction with the physician that allowed patients to be experts in obtaining clearer information, participating in the care process, and negotiating compromises with physician preferences. Requesting second opinions allowed patients to maintain control, even within the paternalistic model preferred by elderly persons. Facilitating factors (trust, qualitative non-verbal communication, time to think) and obstacles (serious/emergency situations, perceived inadequate scientific competence, problems making requests, fear of knowing) were also part of shared decision making.
In the global concept of patient-centered care, shared decision making can be flexible and can integrate paternalistic and informative models. Physicians' expertise should be associated with biomedical and relational skills through listening to, informing, and advising patients, and by supporting patients' choices.
了解患者对决策的看法,并确定决策模型之间的关系。
本定性研究由四个焦点小组访谈(老年人、健康支持小组使用者、学生和农村居民)组成。要求参与者根据三个书面临床情景(高血压、乳腺癌、前列腺癌)报告他们对决策的看法。分析基于扎根理论的原则。
大多数患者认为决策是共同决策,这是一种深思熟虑的问答互动,使患者能够成为获取更清晰信息、参与护理过程以及与医生偏好协商妥协的专家。征求第二意见可以让患者即使在老年人喜欢的家长式模式下也能保持控制。促进因素(信任、定性非言语交流、思考时间)和障碍(严重/紧急情况、感知到的科学能力不足、提出请求的问题、害怕了解)也是共同决策的一部分。
在以患者为中心的护理的全球概念中,共同决策可以具有灵活性,可以整合家长式和信息式模式。医生的专业知识应通过倾听、告知和建议患者,并支持患者的选择,与生物医学和关系技能相结合。