• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可视化未来的不确定性。

Visualizing uncertainty about the future.

机构信息

Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WB, UK.

出版信息

Science. 2011 Sep 9;333(6048):1393-400. doi: 10.1126/science.1191181.

DOI:10.1126/science.1191181
PMID:21903802
Abstract

We are all faced with uncertainty about the future, but we can get the measure of some uncertainties in terms of probabilities. Probabilities are notoriously difficult to communicate effectively to lay audiences, and in this review we examine current practice for communicating uncertainties visually, using examples drawn from sport, weather, climate, health, economics, and politics. Despite the burgeoning interest in infographics, there is limited experimental evidence on how different types of visualizations are processed and understood, although the effectiveness of some graphics clearly depends on the relative numeracy of an audience. Fortunately, it is increasingly easy to present data in the form of interactive visualizations and in multiple types of representation that can be adjusted to user needs and capabilities. Nonetheless, communicating deeper uncertainties resulting from incomplete or disputed knowledge--or from essential indeterminacy about the future--remains a challenge.

摘要

我们都面临着对未来的不确定性,但我们可以根据概率来衡量某些不确定性。概率很难有效地传达给非专业听众,在这篇综述中,我们使用来自体育、天气、气候、健康、经济和政治领域的例子,检查了目前使用视觉方式来传达不确定性的实践。尽管人们对信息图越来越感兴趣,但关于不同类型的可视化如何被处理和理解的实验证据有限,尽管一些图形的有效性显然取决于观众的相对计算能力。幸运的是,越来越容易以交互式可视化和多种可根据用户需求和能力进行调整的表示形式呈现数据。尽管如此,传达由于知识不完整或有争议,或者对未来存在基本不确定性而导致的更深层次的不确定性仍然是一个挑战。

相似文献

1
Visualizing uncertainty about the future.可视化未来的不确定性。
Science. 2011 Sep 9;333(6048):1393-400. doi: 10.1126/science.1191181.
2
Insufficient evidence for interactive or animated graphics for communicating probability.用于传达概率的互动或动画图形证据不足。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2760-2765. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae123.
3
Communicating weather forecast uncertainty: Do individual differences matter?传达天气预报的不确定性:个体差异重要吗?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Mar;24(1):18-33. doi: 10.1037/xap0000165.
4
Visualizing the uncertainty in the relationship between seasonal average climate and malaria risk.可视化季节性平均气候与疟疾风险之间关系的不确定性。
Sci Rep. 2014 Dec 2;4:7264. doi: 10.1038/srep07264.
5
Science-graphic art partnerships to increase research impact.科学图形艺术合作以提高研究影响力。
Commun Biol. 2019 Aug 6;2:295. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0516-1. eCollection 2019.
6
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.《让数字有意义:健康领域概率沟通的循证综述》的范围、方法及概述性研究结果:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
7
Communicating uncertainty using words and numbers.用文字和数字传达不确定性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jun;26(6):514-526. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
8
Imagining Replications: Graphical Prediction & Discrete Visualizations Improve Recall & Estimation of Effect Uncertainty.想象复制:图形预测和离散可视化可提高对效应不确定性的回忆和估计。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Jan;24(1):446-456. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743898. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.利用决策科学提高情报分析能力。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;10(6):753-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691615598511.
10
Values and uncertainties in the predictions of global climate models.全球气候模型预测中的数值与不确定性。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2012 Jun;22(2):111-37. doi: 10.1353/ken.2012.0008.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing patient and public involvement (PPI) in eye research: reflections from developing a research study on Geographic Atrophy treatment acceptability.在眼科研究中实施患者和公众参与(PPI):关于开展一项地理萎缩治疗可接受性研究的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 1;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00747-7.
2
Communicating cancer treatment with pictogram-based timeline visualizations.使用基于象形图的时间线可视化工具传达癌症治疗信息。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):480-491. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae319.
3
Genetic Interventions for Spinocerebellar Ataxia and Huntington's Disease: A Qualitative Study of the Patient Perspective.
遗传性小脑共济失调和亨廷顿病的基因干预措施:从患者角度进行的定性研究。
J Huntingtons Dis. 2024;13(3):321-328. doi: 10.3233/JHD-240026.
4
Dimensions of Uncertainty: A spatiotemporal review of five COVID-19 datasets.不确定性的维度:对五个新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)数据集的时空综述
Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 2024;51(2):200-221. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2021.1975311. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
5
Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on Clinician-Patient Communication of Cardiovascular Disease Risk.医疗保健专业人员对心血管疾病风险的医患沟通的看法。
J Patient Exp. 2024 May 27;11:23743735241257386. doi: 10.1177/23743735241257386. eCollection 2024.
6
Trade-offs between overall survival and side effects in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: eliciting preferences of patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer using a discrete choice experiment.转移性乳腺癌治疗中总生存与副作用的权衡:使用离散选择实验得出原发性和转移性乳腺癌患者的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 28;14(4):e076798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076798.
7
"They are saying it's high, but I think it's quite low": exploring cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS health checks through video-stimulated recall interviews with patients - a qualitative study.“他们说这个数值很高,但我觉得挺低的”:通过对患者进行视频刺激回忆访谈探索英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查中的心血管疾病风险沟通——一项定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 23;25(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02357-w.
8
Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach.基于风险的乳腺癌筛查结果通过风险可视化呈现:一种参与式设计方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02483-6.
9
Assessing the effectiveness of HIV/STI risk communication displays among Melbourne Sexual Health Centre attendees: a cross-sectional, observational and vignette-based study.评估墨尔本性健康中心就诊者中 HIV/性传播感染风险沟通展示的效果:一项基于横断面观察和情景模拟的研究。
Sex Transm Infect. 2024 Apr 18;100(3):158-165. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2023-055978.
10
Who shows the Unlikelihood Effect - and why?谁表现出非概然效应——以及为什么?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1768-1781. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02453-z. Epub 2024 Jan 29.