Suppr超能文献

失眠症非标签抗抑郁药处方的患病率及相关因素。

Prevalence and factors associated with off-label antidepressant prescriptions for insomnia.

作者信息

Lai L Leanne, Tan Mooi Heong, Lai Yen Chi

机构信息

Department of Sociobehavioral and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA;

出版信息

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:27-36. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S21079. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of our study was to investigate the prevalence of off-label antidepressant drug use in insomnia. The secondary objective was to compare prescribing patterns between off-label antidepressants vs hypnotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for insomnia, with particular emphasis on socioeconomic characteristics of patients and physicians.

METHODS

We undertook a secondary data analysis using the national longitudinal database from the 2006 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Subjects were identified from outpatient visits in which at least one insomnia drug was prescribed. A series of weighted Chi-squared statistics was used to compare drug use for insomnia across various patient and physician characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with off-label antidepressant drug use.

RESULTS

Among 901.95 million outpatient visits that took place in the US in 2006, an estimated 30.43 million visits included at least one drug prescription for insomnia. Off-label antidepressants were prescribed significantly more frequently (45.1%) than nonbenzodiazepine z-hypnotics (43.2%) and benzodiazepines (11.7%). Insomnia prescribing patterns were significantly influenced by physician specialty and physician office settings. Pediatricians (odds ratio [OR]: 65.892; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.536-810.564) and neurologists (OR: 4.784; 95% CI: 2.044-11.201) were more likely to prescribe off-label antidepressants than psychiatrists. Self-paying patients were more likely to receive off-label antidepressants as treatment for insomnia than patients with private insurance (OR 2.594; 95% CI: 1.128-5.967).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate significant socioeconomic disparities in the use of off-label antidepressants. Future studies might explore interventional and educational strategies to ensure well informed clinical decisions that can withstand pharmaceutical marketing strategies and diagnostic uncertainties regarding the treatment of insomnia.

摘要

背景

我们研究的主要目的是调查抗抑郁药在失眠治疗中的非标签使用情况。次要目的是比较美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于失眠治疗的非标签抗抑郁药与催眠药的处方模式,尤其关注患者和医生的社会经济特征。

方法

我们使用2006年国家门诊医疗护理调查的全国纵向数据库进行了二次数据分析。从至少开具了一种失眠药物的门诊就诊中识别出研究对象。使用一系列加权卡方统计量来比较不同患者和医生特征下失眠药物的使用情况。进行多因素逻辑回归以确定与非标签抗抑郁药使用相关的因素。

结果

在2006年美国发生的9.0195亿次门诊就诊中,估计有3043万次就诊开具了至少一种失眠药物处方。非标签抗抑郁药的处方频率(45.1%)显著高于非苯二氮䓬类Z型催眠药(43.2%)和苯二氮䓬类药物(11.7%)。失眠药物的处方模式受医生专业和医生办公室环境的显著影响。与精神科医生相比,儿科医生(优势比[OR]:65.892;95%置信区间[CI]:5.536 - 810.564)和神经科医生(OR:4.784;95%CI:2.044 - 11.201)更有可能开具非标签抗抑郁药。自费患者比有私人保险的患者更有可能接受非标签抗抑郁药作为失眠治疗药物(OR 2.594;95%CI:1.128 - 5.967)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明在非标签抗抑郁药的使用上存在显著的社会经济差异。未来的研究可能会探索干预和教育策略,以确保做出明智的临床决策,这些决策能够抵御制药营销策略以及失眠治疗中诊断的不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a054/3163935/4f6ba27e7e37/dhps-3-027f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验