• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视临床试验分层的益处。

The benefit of stratification in clinical trials revisited.

机构信息

Amgen Inc., 1150 Veterans Blvd., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2881-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.4351. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4351
PMID:21905064
Abstract

Stratification is common in clinical trials because it can reduce the variance of the estimated treatment effect. The traditional demonstration of variance reduction relies on the assumption of stratum sizes being fixed quantities. However, in practice, to speed up enrollment, and to obtain a study population with a similar distribution as the overall population, the stratum sizes are allowed to vary. Under the condition that the total sample size is fixed and that the stratum sizes have a multinomial distribution, the criterion changes for achieving a reduction in variance. The relationship between the stratified and unstratified variances is established and shown to be approximately the same for prestratified and post-stratified trials. It is demonstrated why stratification may actually increase the variance compared with no stratification even when the mean square error is reduced on account of stratification. Data from a real clinical trial will be used for illustration. The benefit attributed to stratification needs to be re-examined in light of the findings presented, particularly given its widespread use.

摘要

分层在临床试验中很常见,因为它可以减少估计治疗效果的方差。传统的方差减少证明依赖于分层大小是固定数量的假设。然而,在实践中,为了加快入组速度,并获得与总体人群分布相似的研究人群,允许分层大小发生变化。在总样本量固定且分层大小具有多项分布的条件下,实现方差减少的标准会发生变化。建立了分层和不分层方差之间的关系,并表明对于预分层和后分层试验,它们大致相同。证明了为什么即使由于分层而降低了均方误差,与不分层相比,分层实际上可能会增加方差。将使用来自真实临床试验的数据进行说明。鉴于分层的广泛应用,需要根据提出的结果重新检查归因于分层的益处。

相似文献

1
The benefit of stratification in clinical trials revisited.重新审视临床试验分层的益处。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2881-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.4351. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
2
The large sample bounds on the principal strata effect with application to a prostate cancer prevention trial.主要分层效应的大样本界限及其在前列腺癌预防试验中的应用。
Int J Biostat. 2012 May 21;8(1):Article 12. doi: 10.1515/1557-4679.1365.
3
Sample size calculation for multicenter randomized trial: taking the center effect into account.多中心随机试验的样本量计算:考虑中心效应
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jul;28(4):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
4
Empirical shrinkage estimator for consistency assessment of treatment effects in multi-regional clinical trials.多区域临床试验中治疗效果一致性评估的经验收缩估计量。
Stat Med. 2013 May 10;32(10):1691-706. doi: 10.1002/sim.5543. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
5
Effects of unstratified and centre-stratified randomization in multi-centre clinical trials.多中心临床试验中未分层随机化和中心分层随机化的效果。
Pharm Stat. 2011 Jan-Feb;10(1):50-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.412.
6
Sample size allocation to regions in a multiregional trial.多区域试验中各区域的样本量分配
J Biopharm Stat. 2009 Jul;19(4):580-94. doi: 10.1080/10543400902963185.
7
Design and evaluation of multiregional trials with heterogeneous treatment effect across regions.跨区域治疗效果异质性的多区域试验设计与评估
J Biopharm Stat. 2012 Sep;22(5):1037-50. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.701585.
8
Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized and multicentre trials.整群随机多中心试验中不等与相等整群大小的相对效率
Stat Med. 2007 Jun 15;26(13):2589-603. doi: 10.1002/sim.2740.
9
The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.小样本中心的多中心试验中连续结果的分析。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5445-56. doi: 10.1002/sim.3068.
10
Inefficiency of randomization methods that balance on stratum margins and improvements with permuted blocks and a sequential method.分层边界平衡的随机化方法效率低下,而置换块和序贯方法可以提高效率。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 20;31(16):1699-706. doi: 10.1002/sim.5345. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview of Adaptive Designs and Some of Their Challenges, Benefits, and Innovative Applications.适应性设计概述及其面临的一些挑战、益处和创新应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 16;25:e44171. doi: 10.2196/44171.
2
How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review.初次与再次 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术之间的分层和预测模型分析效果如何?一项多中心研究和叙述性综述。
Obes Surg. 2023 May;33(5):1431-1448. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
3
Design and analysis of stratified clinical trials in the presence of bias.
存在偏倚情况下分层临床试验的设计与分析
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1715-1727. doi: 10.1177/0962280219846146. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
Pair Matcher (PaM): fast model-based optimization of treatment/case-control matches.配对匹配器 (PaM):基于模型的快速治疗/病例对照匹配优化。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Jul 1;35(13):2243-2250. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty946.