• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍在青年期的心理测量学表现:来自澳大利亚一般人群样本的证据。

Psychometric performance of DSM-IV alcohol use disorders in young adulthood: evidence from an Australian general population sample.

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2052, Australia.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Sep;72(5):811-22. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.811.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2011.72.811
PMID:21906508
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current study investigates the performance of alcohol use disorders in young adults using item response theory and differential item functioning (DIF).

METHOD

The 1997 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (Australia) sample was based on a stratified, multistage area probability sample of people ages 18 years and older in the Australian population. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), alcohol use disorders were assessed in all current alcohol users (N = 7,746; 44.2% female). The psychometric properties of the DSM-IV alcohol use disorder criteria in young adults were assessed using item response theory. Age-based DIF was also assessed in each of the DSM-IV criteria for alcohol use disorders. The presence of age-based DIF in subgroups defined by sex and consumption was also examined.

RESULTS

Overall, problems were identified in the use in hazardous situations, persistent desire/inability to quit/cut down, and tolerance criteria in young adults. However, the DIF identified at the criterion level had little impact on total information provided by the criteria across the two age groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that for the female-only and non-heavy using subgroups, DIF was no longer detected in the use in hazardous situations criterion. The alcohol use disorder criteria were found to provide maximum information about moderate to severe pathology among young adults. There was little evidence for the DSM-IV abuse/dependence distinction in young adulthood.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the DSM-IV alcohol use disorder criteria appear problematic when applied to young adults, and future research needs to focus on clarifying young adults' understanding of these problematic criteria. Although DIF was identified in three of the alcohol use disorder criteria, the total information provided by these criteria was largely the same among younger and older age groups.

摘要

目的

本研究采用项目反应理论和差异项目功能(DIF)考察年轻人的酒精使用障碍表现。

方法

1997 年澳大利亚全国精神健康与福利调查(澳大利亚)样本基于澳大利亚人口中分层、多阶段区域概率抽样的 18 岁及以上人群。所有当前的酒精使用者(N=7746;44.2%为女性)都使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)评估了酒精使用障碍。采用项目反应理论评估 DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍标准在年轻人中的心理测量特性。还评估了每个 DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍标准中的年龄差异。还检查了按性别和饮酒量定义的亚组中年龄差异的存在。

结果

总体而言,在年轻人中发现了在危险情况下使用、持续渴望/无法停止/减少使用和耐受标准存在问题。然而,在标准水平上识别出的 DIF 对两个年龄组的标准提供的总信息影响不大。亚组分析表明,对于仅女性和非重度使用亚组,在危险情况下使用标准中不再检测到 DIF。发现酒精使用障碍标准在年轻人中提供了关于中度至重度病理的最大信息。在年轻人中,DSM-IV 滥用/依赖的区别几乎没有证据。

结论

当应用于年轻人时,DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍标准中的一些似乎存在问题,未来的研究需要集中在澄清年轻人对这些有问题标准的理解上。尽管在三个酒精使用障碍标准中识别出了 DIF,但这些标准提供的总信息量在年轻和年长人群中基本相同。

相似文献

1
Psychometric performance of DSM-IV alcohol use disorders in young adulthood: evidence from an Australian general population sample.DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍在青年期的心理测量学表现:来自澳大利亚一般人群样本的证据。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Sep;72(5):811-22. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.811.
2
Alcohol use in hazardous situations: implications for DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders.危险情况下的酒精使用:对 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 酒精使用障碍的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Jan;37 Suppl 1:E228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01881.x. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
3
Patterns of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence criteria among adolescents and adults: results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.青少年和成年人中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)酒精滥用及依赖标准模式:2001年全国药物滥用家庭调查结果
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 May;29(5):810-28. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000164381.67723.76.
4
Assessing the dimensionality of lifetime DSM-IV alcohol use disorders and a quantity-frequency alcohol use criterion in the Australian population: a factor mixture modelling approach.评估澳大利亚人群中终生 DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍的维度和酒精使用量-频率标准:因素混合建模方法。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):333-41. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr008. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
5
Do young adults interpret the DSM diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorders as intended? a cognitive interviewing study.年轻人是否按照预期解读 DSM 酒精使用障碍诊断标准?一项认知访谈研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Jun;37(6):1001-7. doi: 10.1111/acer.12063. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
6
Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.基于项目反应理论构建酒精使用障碍连续谱:美国国家酒精及相关状况流行病学调查结果
Psychol Med. 2006 Jul;36(7):931-41. doi: 10.1017/S003329170600746X. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
7
DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder among young Swiss men.DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 中的瑞士年轻男性酒精使用障碍。
Addiction. 2015 Mar;110(3):429-40. doi: 10.1111/add.12800. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Prospective evaluation of the four DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse in a large population.对大量人群中酒精滥用的四项《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准进行前瞻性评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;162(2):350-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.350.
9
The dimensionality of DSM-IV alcohol use disorders among adolescent and adult drinkers and symptom patterns by age, gender, and race/ethnicity.DSM-IV 酒精使用障碍在青少年和成年饮酒者中的维度以及按年龄、性别和种族/族裔划分的症状模式。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 May;33(5):868-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.00910.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
10
Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in Australia: findings of the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.澳大利亚 DSM-IV 酒精滥用和依赖的患病率及其相关因素:2007 年全国精神健康和福利调查结果。
Addiction. 2010 Dec;105(12):2085-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03096.x. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric validation of the Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool: Alcohol use disorder module.诊断评估研究工具:酒精使用障碍模块的心理测量学验证
Alcohol Alcohol. 2024 Nov 18;60(1). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agae088.
2
Association patterns of antisocial personality disorder across substance use disorders.物质使用障碍中反社会人格障碍的关联模式。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 28;14(1):346. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03054-z.
3
Reliability of Differential Item Functioning in Alcohol Use Disorder: Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Criteria Discrimination Estimates.
酒精使用障碍中鉴别项目功能差异的可靠性:标准判别估计的贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):925-939. doi: 10.1177/1073191120986613. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
Not all alcohol use disorder criteria are equally severe: Toward severity grading of individual criteria in college drinkers.并非所有酒精使用障碍标准都同样严重:针对大学生饮酒者个体标准的严重程度分级。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Feb;33(1):35-49. doi: 10.1037/adb0000443. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
5
DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Severity in Puerto Rico: Prevalence, Criteria Profile, and Correlates.DSM-5 酒精使用障碍严重程度在波多黎各的流行情况、标准特征及相关因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Feb;42(2):378-386. doi: 10.1111/acer.13572. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
6
Drinking to Cope: a Latent Class Analysis of Coping Motives for Alcohol Use in a Large Cohort of Adolescents.借酒消愁:对大量青少年群体饮酒应对动机的潜在类别分析
Prev Sci. 2016 Jul;17(5):584-94. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0652-5.
7
Meta-analysis of DSM alcohol use disorder criteria severities: structural consistency is only 'skin deep'.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》酒精使用障碍标准严重程度的荟萃分析:结构一致性只是“表面现象”。
Psychol Med. 2016 Jun;46(8):1769-84. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000404. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
Limits of Current Approaches to Diagnosis Severity Based on Criterion Counts: An Example with DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder.基于标准计数的当前诊断严重程度方法的局限性:以《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版酒精使用障碍为例
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov 1;3(6):819-835. doi: 10.1177/2167702614553026. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
9
Commonalities and Differences Across Substance Use Disorders: Phenomenological and Epidemiological Aspects.物质使用障碍的共性与差异:现象学和流行病学方面
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;39(10):1878-900. doi: 10.1111/acer.12838. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
Improving the diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorders through survey methodology and cognitive interviewing.通过调查方法和认知访谈改进酒精使用障碍的诊断标准。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Sep;23(3):359-71. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1448. Epub 2014 Jul 2.