• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨模态冲突在物体识别中的作用:确定物体类别影响。

Cross-modal conflicts in object recognition: determining the influence of object category.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):597-605. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2858-x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-011-2858-x
PMID:21912929
Abstract

Previous research examining cross-modal conflicts in object recognition has often made use of animal vocalizations and images, which may be considered natural and ecologically valid, thus strengthening the association in the congruent condition. The current research tested whether the same cross-modal conflict would exist for man-made object sounds as well as comparing the speed and accuracy of auditory processing across the two object categories. Participants were required to attend to a sound paired with a visual stimulus and then respond to a verification item (e.g., "Dog?"). Sounds were congruent (same object), neutral (unidentifiable image), or incongruent (different object) with the images presented. In the congruent and neutral condition, animals were recognized significantly faster and with greater accuracy than man-made objects. It was hypothesized that in the incongruent condition, no difference in reaction time or error rate would be found between animals and man-made objects. This prediction was not supported, indicating that the association between an object's sound and image may not be that disparate when comparing animals to man-made objects. The findings further support cross-modal conflict research for both the animal and man-made object category. The most important finding, however, was that auditory processing is enhanced for living compared to nonliving objects, a difference only previously found in visual processing. Implications relevant to both the neuropsychological literature and sound research are discussed.

摘要

先前研究考察了在物体识别中的跨模态冲突,通常利用动物的叫声和图像,这可能被认为是自然和生态有效的,从而加强了在一致条件下的联想。当前的研究测试了人造物体声音是否也存在相同的跨模态冲突,并比较了这两种物体类别在听觉处理中的速度和准确性。要求参与者关注与视觉刺激配对的声音,然后对验证项目做出响应(例如,“狗?”)。声音与呈现的图像一致(相同的物体)、中性(无法识别的图像)或不一致(不同的物体)。在一致和中性条件下,动物的识别速度明显快于人造物体,并且准确性更高。假设在不一致的条件下,动物和人造物体之间在反应时间或错误率方面不会发现差异。这一预测并未得到支持,表明在比较动物和人造物体时,物体的声音和图像之间的关联可能没有那么不同。这些发现进一步支持了对动物和人造物体这两个类别的跨模态冲突研究。然而,最重要的发现是,与无生命物体相比,听觉处理对生物物体更加增强,这种差异以前只在视觉处理中发现过。讨论了与神经心理学文献和声音研究相关的含义。

相似文献

1
Cross-modal conflicts in object recognition: determining the influence of object category.跨模态冲突在物体识别中的作用:确定物体类别影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):597-605. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2858-x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
2
Category training induces cross-modal object representations in the adult human brain.类别训练诱导成人大脑中的跨模态物体表征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jun;23(6):1315-31. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21522. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
3
Gamma-band activity as a signature for cross-modal priming of auditory object recognition by active haptic exploration.Gamma 波段活动作为通过主动触觉探索对听觉对象识别进行跨模态启动的特征。
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2502-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6447-09.2011.
4
The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.狗的喵叫:跨模态物体识别中的不对称交互。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;193(4):603-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1664-6. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
5
The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.人类大脑中多感觉促进和跨模态冲突的共同发生。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;106(6):2896-909. doi: 10.1152/jn.00303.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
6
Repetition effects in auditory and visual recognition.听觉和视觉识别中的重复效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Mar;204:103021. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103021. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
What you see is not (always) what you hear: induced gamma band responses reflect cross-modal interactions in familiar object recognition.眼见未必(总是)为实:诱发伽马波段反应反映了熟悉物体识别中的跨模态交互作用。
J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 31;27(5):1090-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4828-06.2007.
8
A multisensory perspective on object memory.多感官视角下的物体记忆
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Oct;105:243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
Task-Specific, Age Related Effects in the Cross-Modal Identification and Localisation of Objects.任务特定的、与年龄相关的物体跨模态识别和定位效应。
Multisens Res. 2015;28(1-2):111-51. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002479.
10
Vision dominates at the preresponse level and audition dominates at the response level in cross-modal interaction: behavioral and neural evidence.在跨模态交互中,视觉在预反应水平占主导地位,听觉在反应水平占主导地位:行为和神经证据。
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;33(17):7109-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1985-12.2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective Enhancement of Object Representations through Multisensory Integration.通过多感官整合选择性增强对象表示。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 15;40(29):5604-5615. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2139-19.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic and environmental influences on the organisation of semantic memory in the brain:is "living things" an innate category?遗传和环境对大脑语义记忆组织的影响:“生物”是一种先天类别吗?
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):401-8. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000293.
2
What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence.语义范畴特异性缺损的事实是什么?临床证据的批判性评价。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):213-61. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000266.
3
Neuropsychological and neuroimaging perspectives on conceptual knowledge: an introduction.
概念知识的神经心理学与神经影像学视角:引言
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):195-212. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000050.
4
The fur of the crocodile and the mooing sheep: A study of a patient with a category-specific impairment for biological things.鳄鱼的皮毛和咩咩叫的绵羊:一个具有生物类别特异性损伤患者的研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Jun 1;19(4):301-42. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000196.
5
Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?为什么人耳能更快地察觉自然声音而非嘀嗒声?
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar;127(3):EL105-10. doi: 10.1121/1.3310196.
6
Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: an ALE meta-analysis.针对命名动物图片和命名工具图片的类别特异性神经加工:一项基于激活似然估计的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):409-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.032. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
7
Auditory-visual object recognition time suggests specific processing for animal sounds.视听物体识别时间表明对动物声音存在特定处理。
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005256. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
8
Category-specificity in visual object recognition.视觉物体识别中的类别特异性
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):281-301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
9
The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.狗的喵叫:跨模态物体识别中的不对称交互。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;193(4):603-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1664-6. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
10
Auditory warnings, signal-referent relations, and natural indicators: re-thinking theory and application.听觉警告、信号参照关系与自然指标:对理论与应用的重新思考
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Jun;14(2):165-78. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.165.