Suppr超能文献

电视、阅读和电脑时间:与美国儿童上学日休闲时间久坐行为的相关性及其与超重的关系

Television, reading, and computer time: correlates of school-day leisure-time sedentary behavior and relationship with overweight in children in the U.S.

机构信息

Dept of Nutritional Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8 Suppl 2:S188-97.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purposes were 1) to determine if different leisure-time sedentary behaviors (LTSB), such as TV/video/video game viewing/playing (TV), reading for pleasure (reading), and nonschool computer usage, were associated with childhood overweight status, and 2) to assess the social-ecological correlates of LTSB.

METHODS

The analytic sample was 33,117 (16,952 boys and 16,165 girls) participants from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health. The cut-point for excessive TV and nonschool computer usage was ≥ 2 hr/day. High quantities of daily reading for pleasure were classified as ≥ 31 min/day. Weighted descriptive characteristics were calculated on the sample (means ± SE or frequency). Logistic regression models were used to determine if the LTSB were associated with overweight status and to examine social-ecological correlates.

RESULTS

Over 35% of the sample was overweight. Odds of being overweight were higher in the 2 to 3 hr/day (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.76) and ≥ 4 hr/day (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.91) daily TV groups compared with none. Reading and nonschool computer usage was not associated with being overweight.

CONCLUSIONS

TV was associated with overweight classification; however, nonschool computer usage and reading were not. Several individual, family, and community correlates were associated with high volumes of daily TV viewing.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在:1)确定不同的闲暇时间久坐行为(LTSB),如看电视/视频/玩电子游戏(电视)、阅读消遣(阅读)和非学校使用电脑,是否与儿童超重状况相关;2)评估 LTSB 的社会生态学相关性。

方法

分析样本为 2003 年全国儿童健康调查中的 33117 名(男生 16952 名,女生 16165 名)参与者。每天看电视和非学校使用电脑时间超过 2 小时的被定义为过度时间。每天阅读消遣时间超过 31 分钟被定义为高阅读量。使用加权描述性特征对样本进行计算(平均值±SE 或频率)。使用逻辑回归模型来确定 LTSB 是否与超重状况相关,并检查社会生态学相关性。

结果

超过 35%的样本超重。每天看 2 到 3 小时(OR:1.48,95%CI:1.24,1.76)和每天看≥4 小时(OR:1.52,95%CI:1.22,1.91)的参与者超重的可能性高于不看电视的参与者。阅读和非学校使用电脑与超重无关。

结论

看电视与超重分类相关;然而,非学校使用电脑和阅读与超重无关。一些个体、家庭和社区相关因素与每天大量看电视有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验