• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加课间休息时身体活动的环境改造:准备课间休息的初步发现。

Environmental modifications to increase physical activity during recess: preliminary findings from ready for recess.

机构信息

Dept of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8 Suppl 2:S249-56.

PMID:21918239
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Ready for Recess: an elementary school recess intervention targeting staff training (ST) and providing recreational equipment (EQ).

METHODS

Ready for Recess had 4 intervention schools: 1) EQ+ST, 2) EQ, 3) ST, and 4) control. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed with accelerometers at the four schools in 257 3rd- to 6th-grade children. Random intercept models for overweight/obese (OWOB) and healthy weight (HW) for boys and girls separately, examined change in percentage of time spent in MVPA during recess across EQ+ST, EQ, and ST compared with the control from baseline to postintervention.

RESULTS

HW boys receiving EQ+ST increased MVPA by 19.4%, OWOB boys receiving ST increased MVPA by 4.5%, OWOB girls receiving EQ-ST increased MVPA by 6.0%, while HW girls receiving EQ decreased MVPA by 13.6% in comparison with the control.

CONCLUSIONS

Ready for Recess represents a possible means to increase MVPA in OWOB girls/boys, populations least likely to meet MVPA recommendations. However, the effect of the intervention was not uniform across all subgroups.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定 Ready for Recess 的有效性:一项针对工作人员培训 (ST) 和提供娱乐设备 (EQ) 的小学课间休息干预措施。

方法

Ready for Recess 有 4 所干预学校:1) EQ+ST,2) EQ,3) ST,和 4) 对照组。在 4 所学校的 257 名 3 至 6 年级儿童中,使用加速度计评估中度到剧烈体力活动 (MVPA)。对于男孩和女孩,分别使用随机截距模型,针对超重/肥胖 (OWOB) 和健康体重 (HW),比较 EQ+ST、EQ 和 ST 组与对照组从基线到干预后的课间 MVPA 时间百分比的变化。

结果

接受 EQ+ST 的 HW 男孩 MVPA 增加了 19.4%,接受 ST 的 OWOB 男孩 MVPA 增加了 4.5%,接受 EQ-ST 的 OWOB 女孩 MVPA 增加了 6.0%,而接受 EQ 的 HW 女孩 MVPA 减少了 13.6%与对照组相比。

结论

Ready for Recess 可能是增加 OWOB 女孩/男孩中 MVPA 的一种手段,这些人群最不可能达到 MVPA 推荐标准。然而,干预的效果并不是所有亚组都一致的。

相似文献

1
Environmental modifications to increase physical activity during recess: preliminary findings from ready for recess.增加课间休息时身体活动的环境改造:准备课间休息的初步发现。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8 Suppl 2:S249-56.
2
Environmental Modifications to Increase Physical Activity During Recess: Preliminary Findings from Ready for Recess.通过环境改造增加课间体育活动:“准备好课间休息”的初步研究结果
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8(s2):S249-S256. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s249.
3
Effects of ready for recess, an environmental intervention, on physical activity in third- through sixth-grade children.准备课间休息对三至六年级儿童身体活动的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Feb;11(2):384-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0061. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
4
Does the effect of a school recess intervention on physical activity vary by gender or race? Results from the Ready for Recess pilot study.课间休息干预对体育活动的影响是否因性别或种族而异?来自预备课间休息的初步研究结果。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):416-22. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318226ca47.
5
Physical activity levels of normal-weight and overweight girls and boys during primary school recess.小学课间休息期间正常体重和超重女孩与男孩的身体活动水平。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jun;15(6):1513-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.179.
6
Exploring effective strategies for increasing the amount of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity children accumulate during recess: a quasi-experimental intervention study.探索在课间增加儿童中等到剧烈身体活动量的有效策略:一项准实验干预研究。
J Sch Health. 2013 Apr;83(4):265-72. doi: 10.1111/josh.12026.
7
What helps children to move more at school recess and lunchtime? Mid-intervention results from Transform-Us! cluster-randomised controlled trial.什么能帮助孩子在课间休息和午餐时间多运动?Transform-Us!的中期干预结果:集群随机对照试验。
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):271-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092466. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Environmental correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in after-school recreation sessions.课余休闲时间内客观测量的身体活动和久坐行为的环境相关性。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8 Suppl 2:S214-21.
9
Physical activity and school recess time: differences between the sexes and the relationship between children's playground physical activity and habitual physical activity.体育活动与学校课间休息时间:性别差异以及儿童操场体育活动与习惯性体育活动之间的关系。
J Sports Sci. 2005 Mar;23(3):269-75. doi: 10.1080/02640410410001730124.
10
Differences in physical activity during school recess.课间休息期间的身体活动差异。
J Sch Health. 2011 Sep;81(9):545-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00625.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior in children and adolescents during school recess: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年课间休息时身体活动及久坐行为的相关因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):2662. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23948-x.
2
Physical Activity Interventions During the School Day: Reviewing Policies, Practices, and Benefits.学校日期间的身体活动干预:政策、实践与益处回顾。
J Sch Health. 2023 Sep;93(9):778-787. doi: 10.1111/josh.13371.
3
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.
以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
4
Evidence-Based Overview of Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity during School Recess: An Updated Systematic Review.基于证据的学校课间休息期间加速度计测量的身体活动概述:更新的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020578.
5
Interventions to Change School Recess Activity Levels in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.干预措施改变儿童和青少年课间活动水平:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2020 Dec;50(12):2145-2173. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01347-z.
6
An observational study of recess quality and physical activity in urban primary schools.一项关于城市小学课间质量和体育活动的观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08849-5.
7
Physical activity and social connectedness interventions in outdoor spaces among children and youth: a rapid review.儿童和青少年户外活动中的身体活动和社会联系干预措施:快速综述。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Apr;40(4):104-115. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.4.02.
8
A mixed-studies systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary time in children.一项基于混合研究的系统评价和荟萃分析,评估了以学校为基础的干预措施,以促进儿童的身体活动和/或减少久坐时间。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Jan;9(1):3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
9
Interventions for preventing obesity in children.儿童肥胖预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;7(7):CD001871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub4.
10
The effect of increasing risk and challenge in the school playground on physical activity and weight in children: a cluster randomised controlled trial (PLAY).学校操场增加风险和挑战对儿童身体活动及体重的影响:一项整群随机对照试验(PLAY)
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 May;41(5):793-800. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.41. Epub 2017 Feb 10.