Suppr超能文献

两种不同阻力引起的肌肉疲劳:弹性管与举重器械。

Muscle fatigue induced by two different resistances: Elastic tubing versus weight machines.

机构信息

University of Tor Vergata, School of Motor Science, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Dec;21(6):954-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

Abstract

Elastic tubes are devices relatively inexpensive, easy to use, portable and safe, which are claimed to provide advantages with respect to training with free weights or weight machine. The aim of this work was to assess neuromuscular modification induced by the use of two different muscle contraction modalities (elastic versus weight resistances) until exhaustion. Fourteen healthy physically active male students (age: 28±6 years; body mass 72.1±11.0kg; height: 173.5±6.9cm) were recruited. They were requested to reach exhaustion with dynamic contraction at 70% of their own One Repetition Maximal (1RM) using, in two different days and in random order, Thera Band® tubes or traditional weight plates on an arm machine designed and built for those tasks. Before and after such contractions a standardized fatiguing isometric test (3 Maximal Voluntary Contractions, MVC plus 60s at 60% MVC) was requested to assess differences induced by the exhaustion sessions. During fatiguing tests surface EMG signals were recorded from biceps brachii muscle with linear arrays of eight electrodes (silver bars 10mm apart, 5mm long, and 1mm diameter) in single differential configuration. Initial values and rates of change of Average Rectified Value (ARV), MeaN power Frequency (MNF) and muscle fiber Conduction Velocity (CV) were calculated to compare the effects of the two contraction modalities. No differences were found between "elastic session" and "weight session" PRE MVCs (31.9±8.8 and 29.9±8.3nm, respectively) and endurance times (28±6 and 26±7s, respectively). The same was observed for POST values. During the post-contraction isometric fatigue test, the only parameters influenced by the contraction modality were the initial CV and the rate of change in CV which were 12% and 37% greater (p<0.05) respectively after contractions performed with elastic resistance compared to free weights. These findings confirm others for which contractions done with the use of elastic band seem to require greater muscle activation; moreover, they highlight a sort of "muscle conditioning" after that specific contraction modality which requires the use of faster motor units. It is thus possible to consider the practical use of such elastic devices to increase the neuromuscular activation, for instance in specific rehabilitation settings where slow movements with minimal risk of injury are requested (post surgery rehabilitation, physical activity with elderly people or children).

摘要

弹性管是一种相对便宜、易于使用、便携且安全的设备,据称它们在训练方面具有优于自由重量或重量器械的优势。本研究的目的是评估两种不同肌肉收缩方式(弹性阻力与重量阻力)引起的神经肌肉变化直至力竭。14 名健康的男性大学生(年龄:28±6 岁;体重:72.1±11.0kg;身高:173.5±6.9cm)被招募。他们被要求在两天内以两种不同的顺序,在一台为这些任务设计和制造的手臂机器上,使用 Thera Band®管或传统的重量板,以 70%的自身最大重复次数(1RM)进行动态收缩,直至力竭。在这些收缩前后,要求进行标准化的疲劳等长测试(3 次最大自主收缩,MVC 加 60%MVC 持续 60s),以评估疲劳训练引起的差异。在疲劳测试期间,使用线性 8 电极阵列(银条间隔 10mm,长 5mm,直径 1mm)以单差分配置记录肱二头肌的表面肌电信号。计算平均整流值(ARV)、平均功率频率(MNF)和肌肉纤维传导速度(CV)的初始值和变化率,以比较两种收缩方式的效果。“弹性训练”和“重量训练”的 PRE-MVC 没有差异(分别为 31.9±8.8nm 和 29.9±8.3nm)和耐力时间(分别为 28±6s 和 26±7s)。POST 值也是如此。在收缩后的等长疲劳测试中,只有收缩方式影响的参数是初始 CV 和 CV 的变化率,与自由重量相比,使用弹性阻力进行收缩后,这两个参数分别增加了 12%和 37%(p<0.05)。这些发现证实了其他研究结果,即使用弹性带进行的收缩似乎需要更大的肌肉激活;此外,它们突出了在使用特定收缩方式后的一种“肌肉调节”,这种收缩方式需要使用更快的运动单位。因此,可以考虑使用这种弹性设备来增加神经肌肉的激活,例如在需要最小受伤风险的特定康复环境中(手术后康复、老年人或儿童的体育活动)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验