Suppr超能文献

音乐家对浊音和清音声学刺激的加工。

Processing of voiced and unvoiced acoustic stimuli in musicians.

机构信息

Division Neuropsychology, Psychological Institute, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 6;2:195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00195. eCollection 2011.

Abstract

Past research has shown that musical training induces changes in the processing of supra-segmental aspects of speech, such as pitch and prosody. The aim of the present study was to determine whether musical expertise also leads to an altered neurophysiological processing of sub-segmental information available in the speech signal, in particular the voice-onset-time. Using high-density EEG-recordings we analyzed the neurophysiological responses to voiced and unvoiced consonant-vowel-syllables and noise-analogs in 26 German speaking adult musicians and non-musicians. From the EEG the N1 amplitude of the event-related potential and two microstates from the topographical EEG analysis (one around the N1 amplitude and one immediately preceding the N1 microstate) were calculated to the different stimuli. Similar to earlier studies the N1 amplitude was different to voiced and unvoiced stimuli in non-musicians with larger amplitudes to voiced stimuli. The more refined microstate analysis revealed that the microstate within the N1 time window was shorter to unvoiced stimuli in non-musicians. For musicians there was no difference for the N1 amplitudes and the corresponding microstates between voiced and unvoiced stimuli. In addition, there was a longer very early microstate preceding the microstate at the N1 time window to non-speech stimuli only in musicians. Taken together, our findings suggest that musicians process unvoiced stimuli (irrespective whether these stimuli are speech or non-speech stimuli) differently than controls. We propose that musicians utilize the same network to analyze unvoiced stimuli as for the analysis of voiced stimuli. As a further explanation it is also possible that musicians devote more neurophysiological resources into the analysis of unvoiced segments.

摘要

过去的研究表明,音乐训练会引起言语超音段特征(如音高和韵律)处理的变化。本研究的目的是确定音乐专业知识是否也会导致言语信号中可利用的亚音段信息(特别是嗓音起始时间)的神经生理处理发生改变。我们使用高密度脑电图记录分析了 26 位讲德语的成年音乐家和非音乐家对浊音和清音辅音-元音音节以及噪声类似物的神经生理反应。从脑电图中,我们计算了事件相关电位的 N1 振幅和地形图脑电图分析的两个微状态(一个在 N1 振幅周围,一个在 N1 微状态之前)到不同的刺激。与早期研究相似,非音乐家的 N1 振幅对浊音和清音刺激的差异较大,对浊音刺激的振幅较大。更精细的微状态分析表明,非音乐家的 N1 时间窗口内的微状态对清音刺激更短。对于音乐家,在 N1 时间窗口内,语音和非语音刺激之间的 N1 振幅和相应的微状态没有差异。此外,只有音乐家对非语音刺激才有一个较长的非常早期微状态,位于 N1 时间窗口的微状态之前。总的来说,我们的发现表明音乐家对清音刺激(无论这些刺激是语音还是非语音刺激)的处理与对照组不同。我们提出,音乐家利用相同的网络来分析清音刺激,就像分析浊音刺激一样。作为进一步的解释,音乐家也可能将更多的神经生理资源投入到对清音段的分析中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b7f/3167375/a667ebcc380f/fpsyg-02-00195-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验